I will continue with the parts of sysutils you do not want to deal with. Lets not orphan them, okay? Also, I think at one time procinfo became its own package.
Thanks,
Lon
On Fri, 2002-08-09 at 08:56, Oliver Kurth wrote:
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 08:24:33AM -0500, Lonnie Sauter wrote: > Oliver- > > I have no problems with you updating the sysutils package if you wish. > If you would like to have the package we could arrange it. I have been > looking to find something different to work on in any case. Okay, I think I would prefer this scenario: Let me take over the complete package sysutils, I will (try to) fix the bugs there, and split it into its four parts. Maybe we can provide a virtual package sysutils, which depends on all four parts, so upgrades are smooth. After some time, I will give procinfo and tofromdos free for adoption, and keep bogomips and memtester. If there is nobody else who wants procinfo and tofromdos, I will keep them for a while. I think this way we achieve the following goals: - split the package so that it makes sense - get the bugs fixed (if possible) - upgrades are smooth Well, procinfo does not look so bad - maybe I keep it... and there is version 18 there, waiting to be packaged. Is this okay for all of you? Greetings, Oliver -- debian/rules http://zork.net/~nick/srom/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
