Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> martin f krafft wrote:
> > also sprach Brian O'Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.09.14.2356 +0200]:
> > > The vpopmail package insists on being built by the root user, which has
> > > obvious implications when it comes time to sign the generated
Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 04:42:48AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
>
> Mmm, but what if there is a bug found in ocaml's native code compiler,
> that forces me to disable one of the architectures, like i did for ia64
> and powe
Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 04:42:48AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
>
> Mmm, but what if there is a bug found in ocaml's native code compiler,
> that forces me to disable one of the architectures, like i did for ia64
> and powe
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi mentors,
> is possible to have an Arch: field defined by a substvar?
>
> Our problem (with our = debian ocaml maintainers) is that ocaml native
> code compiler isn't available for all architectures supported by debian,
> and, even if we have a
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi mentors,
> is possible to have an Arch: field defined by a substvar?
>
> Our problem (with our = debian ocaml maintainers) is that ocaml native
> code compiler isn't available for all architectures supported by debian,
> and, even if we have
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jérôme Marant) writes:
> > Jérôme Marant wrote:
> >> Goswin, why didn't you get any clue? Did you read the thread in
> >> the WNPP RFP bug? Did you read mldonkey-archives? I think you
> >> didn't.
> >
> > Before getting offensive read the mldonkey-mailing lists yourself.
Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > Goswin, why didn't you get any clue? Did you read the thread in
> > the WNPP RFP bug? Did you read mldonkey-archives? I think you
> > didn't.
No of cause I didn't read the RFP. I also didn't change the Bugs title
to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jérôme Marant) writes:
> > Jérôme Marant wrote:
> >> Goswin, why didn't you get any clue? Did you read the thread in
> >> the WNPP RFP bug? Did you read mldonkey-archives? I think you
> >> didn't.
> >
> > Before getting offensive read the mldonkey-mailing lists yourself.
Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > Goswin, why didn't you get any clue? Did you read the thread in
> > the WNPP RFP bug? Did you read mldonkey-archives? I think you
> > didn't.
No of cause I didn't read the RFP. I also didn't change the Bugs title
to
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 11:56:13AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > I _started_ packaging mldonkey and have some preliminary deb packages
> > at
>
> Since mldonkey is written in Objective Caml, I suggest you to have a
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 11:56:13AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I _started_ packaging mldonkey and have some preliminary deb packages
> > at
> >
> > rsync rsync://mrvn.homeip.net/mld
Hi,
I _started_ packaging mldonkey and have some preliminary deb packages
at
rsync rsync://mrvn.homeip.net/mldonkey
If anyone here is intrested in testing and sponsoring mldonkey let me
know. Also feel free to take a look at the package, good comments are
allways appreciated.
MfG
Goswin
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 11:56:13AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > I _started_ packaging mldonkey and have some preliminary deb packages
> > at
>
> Since mldonkey is written in Objective Caml, I suggest you to have a
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 11:56:13AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I _started_ packaging mldonkey and have some preliminary deb packages
> > at
> >
> > rsync rsync://mrvn.homeip.net/mld
Hi,
I _started_ packaging mldonkey and have some preliminary deb packages
at
rsync rsync://mrvn.homeip.net/mldonkey
If anyone here is intrested in testing and sponsoring mldonkey let me
know. Also feel free to take a look at the package, good comments are
allways appreciated.
MfG
Goswi
Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm the maintainer of crafty, a chess engine
> (http://packages.debian.org/crafty).
>
> When you install crafty for the first time, it installed compiled
> opening books in /var/lib/crafty. Then, as it plays against you, it
> 'l
Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm the maintainer of crafty, a chess engine (http://packages.debian.org/crafty).
>
> When you install crafty for the first time, it installed compiled
> opening books in /var/lib/crafty. Then, as it plays against you, it
> 'lea
Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am taking a look at renameutils
> (http://freshmeat.net/projects/renameutils) in oprder to file an ITP.
>
> Upstream already has a debian/ directory and I am not sure what to do...
>
> ¿Should I just remove it form the .tar.gz and use that as my
> .orig.tar.
Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am taking a look at renameutils
> (http://freshmeat.net/projects/renameutils) in oprder to file an ITP.
>
> Upstream already has a debian/ directory and I am not sure what to do...
>
> ¿Should I just remove it form the .tar.gz and use that as my
> .orig.tar
Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Michael Cardenas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020727 19:22]:
> > The developer at limewire that I spoke to asked me to turn them on, so
> > I guess that I should, although that's not what users are going to
> > want.
> >
> > Any thoughts on this?
>
> you
Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Michael Cardenas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020727 19:22]:
> > The developer at limewire that I spoke to asked me to turn them on, so
> > I guess that I should, although that's not what users are going to
> > want.
> >
> > Any thoughts on this?
>
> yo
>>>>> " " == tony mancill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 7 Jan 2001, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
>> The orig.tar.gz file should be pristine (does someone have the
>> pointer to the policiy about this?). Basically NEVER rebuild
>&g
>>>>> " " == tony mancill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 7 Jan 2001, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
>> The orig.tar.gz file should be pristine (does someone have the
>> pointer to the policiy about this?). Basically NEVER rebuild
>&g
> " " == Jason Henry Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> apt-get source byacc and you have the old .tar.gz. (Or is there
>> a good reason for a newly compressed tarball?)
> The reason I wanted to try a recompressed tarball was that
Hi,
Could someone please upload
debian-mirror 1.0-1
deb ftp://rut.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de/ unstable main
deb-src ftp://rut.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de/ unstable main
ftp://rut.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de/dists/unstable/main/[source/binary-i386]/
Thanks.
MfG
Goswin
> " " == Jason Henry Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> apt-get source byacc and you have the old .tar.gz. (Or is there
>> a good reason for a newly compressed tarball?)
> The reason I wanted to try a recompressed tarball was tha
Hi,
Could someone please upload
debian-mirror 1.0-1
deb ftp://rut.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de/ unstable main
deb-src ftp://rut.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de/ unstable main
ftp://rut.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de/dists/unstable/main/[source/binary-i386]/
Thanks.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUB
> " " == Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Goswin! You wrote:
>> Yes its possible and its covered. Try the web pages, I saw it
>> there yesterday.
> You are mistaken. It is only desribed for build time
> relationships (Build-Depends, etc). And no, the sam
> " " == Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Goswin! You wrote:
>> Yes its possible and its covered. Try the web pages, I saw it
>> there yesterday.
> You are mistaken. It is only desribed for build time
> relationships (Build-Depends, etc). And no, the sa
> " " == Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi! For my sndconfig package, I would like to declare a
> different dependecy for the sparc architecture (sndconfig/sparc
> does not require isapnp, which isn't even available for
> sparc). Is this possible? I haven't be
> " " == Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi! For my sndconfig package, I would like to declare a
> different dependecy for the sparc architecture (sndconfig/sparc
> does not require isapnp, which isn't even available for
> sparc). Is this possible? I haven't b
>>>>> " " == Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 09:17:54PM +0100, Goswin Brederlow
> wrote:
>> Maybe you can find some webpage describing such reductions to
>> this standard form (whatever that t
>>>>> " " == Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 09:17:54PM +0100, Goswin Brederlow
> wrote:
>> Maybe you can find some webpage describing such reductions to
>> this standard form (whatever that t
Maybe you can find some webpage describing such reductions to this
standard form (whatever that then is).
MfG
Goswin
Maybe you can find some webpage describing such reductions to this
standard form (whatever that then is).
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> " " == J?r?me Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, (and happy new year :-))
> I'm packaging a program that has some kind of dependencies:
> Package: A Depends: B | C, D | E
> I'd like to make sure that: - once B installed, D was also
> installed - or once C in
> " " == Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, (and happy new year :-))
> I'm packaging a program that has some kind of dependencies:
> Package: A Depends: B | C, D | E
> I'd like to make sure that: - once B installed, D was also
> installed - or once C i
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 03:15:04AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Yeah, I hate perl. Its easy to create bugs and hard to fix them.
>
> You can do that in any language. Perl is no different to C in that regard.
> Recently I've been programming a lo
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 03:15:04AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>wrote:
> > Yeah, I hate perl. Its easy to create bugs and hard to fix them.
>
> You can do that in any language. Perl is no different to C in that regard.
> Recently I've been programming a
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>"goswin" == goswin brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> goswin> Yes, pretty strong words. Hope they wake up some people.
>
> I suggest you give it a little more thought, and a little more
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>"goswin" == goswin brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> goswin> Yes, pretty strong words. Hope they wake up some people.
>
> I suggest you give it a little more thought, and a little more
Debian Newbie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, All. I have two questions about deb packages.
>...
> Also, what is the correct procedure to deal with upgrades from upstream?
> My patches won't apply correctly to the newer version of the software...
> :-( Do I have to patch it by hand? Is there any
Debian Newbie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, All. I have two questions about deb packages.
>...
> Also, what is the correct procedure to deal with upgrades from upstream?
> My patches won't apply correctly to the newer version of the software...
> :-( Do I have to patch it by hand? Is there an
Bart Schuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Aug 13, 2000 at 05:42:40PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > if [ `pidof sawfish` ]; then
> >
> > Consider a bug being opened against it.
> >
> > Installation MUST be non-interacti
Bart Schuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Aug 13, 2000 at 05:42:40PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>wrote:
> > Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > if [ `pidof sawfish` ]; then
> >
> > Consider a bug being opened against it.
> >
> > Installation MUST be non-intera
"Warren A. Layton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just uploaded my first package last week (login.app 1.2.1-12), but the
> key which I used to generate the signature expired a few days later
> (d'oh!).
>
> I have generated a new key and signed it with the old one. However, I am
> wondering if I
Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks, for all your answers. The postinst is now:
>
> if [ `pidof sawfish` ]; then
> echo
> echo " WARNIG - WARNIG - WARNIG - WARNIG - WARNIG - WARNIG"
> echo
> echo " You need to restart sawfish right now"
>
"Warren A. Layton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just uploaded my first package last week (login.app 1.2.1-12), but the
> key which I used to generate the signature expired a few days later
> (d'oh!).
>
> I have generated a new key and signed it with the old one. However, I am
> wondering if I
Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks, for all your answers. The postinst is now:
>
> if [ `pidof sawfish` ]; then
> echo
> echo " WARNIG - WARNIG - WARNIG - WARNIG - WARNIG - WARNIG"
> echo
> echo " You need to restart sawfish right now"
>
I started packaging bochs and the first debs are available at
ftp://rut.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de/
Don't judge me by them, I know their major faults, but if your
intrested in Bochs (a i386 emulator, good for testing bootdisks or
playing populous) I need a mentor for it.
May the Source be with
Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "BS" == Bart Schuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> BS> Is policy the one and only reason for wanting stuff? If this fixes what
> BS> I hope it does, the the "need" has an "or else you may need to hard
> BS> reset your machine bec
Christoph Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi!
>
> I have the following problem. In a c++ program I use the vector template.
> Acording to "The C++ Programming Language" by Bjarne Stroustrup there
> should be a member at() for checked random access to components of a
> vector. But it seems t
I started packaging bochs and the first debs are available at
ftp://rut.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de/
Don't judge me by them, I know their major faults, but if your
intrested in Bochs (a i386 emulator, good for testing bootdisks or
playing populous) I need a mentor for it.
May the Source be with
Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "BS" == Bart Schuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> BS> Is policy the one and only reason for wanting stuff? If this fixes what
> BS> I hope it does, the the "need" has an "or else you may need to hard
> BS> reset your machine be
Christoph Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi!
>
> I have the following problem. In a c++ program I use the vector template.
> Acording to "The C++ Programming Language" by Bjarne Stroustrup there
> should be a member at() for checked random access to components of a
> vector. But it seems
Joel Klecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 04:53 + 1999-10-27, David Coe wrote:
> >/usr/lib/portsentry is indeed the right place, as long as the scripts
> >don't change other than at installation/upgrade time.
>
> Actually, since they are perl and therefore architecture independant,
> /us
Franklin Belew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Hmm, I might file a bug against that. Interactive installation realy
> > sucks and it will bann lsdoom from my demo-fs packages as a possible
> > game to include. Patching it back to noninteractive is work. :(
> >
> > If you have two binaries, make t
Chris McKillop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Replaces: wmaker-superfluous, wmaker-traditional, wmaker-sound, wmaker-kde,
> wmak
> Conflicts: wmaker-superfluous, wmaker-traditional, wmaker-sound, wmaker-kde,
> wma
> Provides: wmaker-kde, wmaker-gnome, wmaker-plain
...
> that it can remove it with
Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Oct 24, 1999 at 10:56:21PM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > Look at lincity. If I remember right it generates three packages:
> >
> > main, svga and X11.
> >
> > The svga and x11 package contain the binarie
Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is it permissable to create binaries, linked against svgalib,
> which are setuid/setgid root.root?
> The security paranoid system administrator in me says this is
> a big no-no, particularly when what I'm talking about is a game
> (lxdoom). But then, when yo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> All this comes out of thin air, but here goes:
>
> * I think that currently the goal is to support the highest
>optimization that does not hurt (noticeably) the low end
No, thats evil and uneccessary. I consider compiling with -O3 or
higher as a bug for non-criti
I saw electricsheep of http://www.freshmeat.net/ on the yesterdays
list. It sounds intresting but needs a good network connection. Since
I only have a modem at home and already enough other work I would be
happy if anyone else intrested in fractals could package it. Should be
fairly easy (uses con
Jozef Hitzinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 2 Sep 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Another thing that interests me is, whether you can export the UPS via
> > a network block device to another system and if you can split an UPS
> > into two devices (one local and the other maybe exported
Jozef Hitzinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ("Being too generic is a bug." -Linus)
"There are no bugs, those are features." - M$
Mfg,
Goswin
I understood the previous mails in a way that only one UPS where
possible and i thought that more would be needed frequently. Since
that seems possible with a little tweeking of the scripts, thats fine.
Another thing that interests me is, whether you can export the UPS via
a network block device
Jozef Hitzinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 25 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > What if you have several ups from several vendors all controled by a
> > central system?
>
> But .. that means, that you've got boxes which depend on power controlled
> by another computer. I don't think
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here's what I figured out (please correct me if I'm wrong).
>
> - Have your package provide and conflict with "ups-monitor"
> - provide a symlink such that /etc/init.d/ups-monitor points to
>your /etc/init.d/smartupstools script. This scrip
"Rudy Broersma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> I've installed a new kernel onto my Linux box! Version 2.3.8. (The old one
> was 2.2.8.. if I recall correct) Anyway.. the kernel works.. but when I
> bootup, and everything is beeing started like SMB, Sendmail, NIC's, etc,
> etc, I get lot
Sami Dalouche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Jul 25, 1999 at 05:52:10PM +0300, Alex Shnitman wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 23, 1999 at 09:32:08PM +0200, Radovan Garabik wrote:
> >
> > > 1) I am the author of program I am packaging. To save myself
> > > some work, I have packaged it as a native d
Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i'm trying to package curl. curl is tool to download anything from
> the net in all sort of ways (http, ftp, gopher, https). it comes
> also with ssl support, i can tell it to compile ssl support by a switch
> after ./configure.
>
> in order to get
From: Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hello,
> I apologize in advance if this is in a FAQ or something, or if this
> is the wrong mailing list...
> I have recently started using CVS to keep track of my source. I use
> cvs-upgrade to `install' the upstream source, and everything works
> very well
From: Christopher C Chimelis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 5 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I did some fixes and cleanup on the defrag package and have e2dump
>> 64Bit clean and 2GB proff now, but still have some bugs left to
>> fix. Also the defrag tells me that it can't find inode xxx, where
>
From: Peter Moulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
...
> Most of the packages up for sponsorship have been around for some
> time (~a year) distributed from the e2compr web pages. I haven't
> received any bug reports for the Debian packages yet, which suggests
> that they should have relatively low maintenan
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> They are overworked. The best way to become a developer now is to
> pick some orphaned packages from WNPP[1] and adopt them - people who
> do that, I believe, are most welcome :)
I'm currently working on dpkgconfig which goes into a similar
direction as J
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl M. Hegbloom) writes:
> Can you please try and fix `fakeroot' for us?
And how without being maintainer should I upload any changes?
May the Source be with you.
Goswin
I'm trying to become a Debian maintainer for some time now. I've send
my aplication to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about 2 month ago and never
heard from it again.
Two weeks and one week ago I asked what happened to my application on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and still got no answere.
So now I ask here if that lis
Gwyneth Lloyd-Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am currently working on some packages and had a question. When I
> finish with my packages, do I add them manualy to the Packages.gz
> file? I can't seem to find any information on any automated way of
> doing so. I was hoping to test some lo
Michael-John Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all
>
> I'm busy packaging rrdtool ATM and it includes a full copy of gd 1.2 in
> the source tree. I will modify it to link to gd dynamically (and set the
> requires: on the package accordingly, etc). Should I remove the now-unneeded
> gd sou
78 matches
Mail list logo
