Hi,
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Christopher Howard
wrote:
> For most of my software, I roll my own debs and make them publicly
> available, including all the debian source files. I try to follow my
> maintainer's guide and debian policy closely while making them, and they
> are usually linti
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Dmitry Nezhevenko wrote:
> As you can see, there is nested declaration here. It's wrong. Looks like
> this code was working due to some GCC bug. Other compilers forbids this
> too.
To expand/clarify, this is not a "nested declaration", but rather a
redefiniti
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Vladimir Stavrinov
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 11:48:27AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
>> > So I don't understand, why do You think my package is worse of those
>> > garbage and how it break "coherence".
>>
>> I don't have a position one way or another on whether
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Vladimir Stavrinov
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 10:08:08AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
>
>> barrier to entry there: Debian should be a coherent operating system
>
> Very good. But to keep system in "coherent" state You should not only
> build barrier on entry, but
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote:
>> ecosystem. Consider for instance that if one day you suddenly can not
>> contribute anymore, somebody else will need to care of the package. Summed
>> together, even removals takes time.
>
> It would be a nice behavior, if maintainer
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Gerber van der Graaf
wrote:
> During the building on my box, the packages appeared to be lintian error
> free. Though, some warning / error messages showed up on the mentors
> site where the packages can be found, which I have commented. The
That's a lot of l
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Geoffroy Youri Berret wrote:
> Le 20/03/2012 17:00, Jakub Wilk a écrit :
>> Your Replaces is versioned but Conflicts is not. This is awkward.
>> What has changed in python-mpd 0.3.0 that Replaces is not needed
>> anymore?
>>
>> Is the conflict with python-mpd
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Fernando Lemos wrote:
>
>> That would be perfect. Any tips on how to get this started? Should
>> this be discussed in debian-devel, or perhaps debian-desktop?
>
> The procedure
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 4:15 AM, Fernando Lemos wrote:
>
>> [1]:
>> http://standards.freedesktop.org/icon-theme-spec/icon-theme-spec-latest.html
>
> I think you want this spec instead since it specif
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Mohammad Ali Rostami
wrote:
> Dear All
>
> We are a group of students developing a software called GraphLab. GraphLab
> is a software framework to work on graphs and social networks. it consists
> of a graph library and a graph GUI. The library part is a framew
Hello,
I failed to find any documentation on how to properly depend on icon
themes. After reading the fd.o icon theme specification[1], it looks
like the specification doesn't cover what "base" icons must be present
in a theme. That could mean that packages that use those specific
icons need to de
HI,
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Paul Elliott
wrote:
>
> Is there any archive where I can get obsolete superseded uploads to debian
> unstable? I need to get one for historical reasons.
You mean something like http://snapshot.debian.org/ ?
Regards,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-men
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 5:44 AM, Ondřej Žára wrote:
> v8cgi itself is implemented in C++ and has libv8 as its only
> dependency. It is developed at Google Code
> (http://code.google.com/p/v8cgi/) under New BSD Licence. Ubuntu
> packages are available from a Launchpad PPA
> (https://launchpad.
Hello,
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Michael Stummvoll wrote:
> I uploaded a new version of the suckless-tools package:
> * dropped st now, cause its maintained by the stterm-packe.
> * included sprop and lsx from the suckless-upstream into the package.
> * changed slock to not suid root b
Hello,
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Tobias Frost wrote:
> However, please go forward with the review of the package, and to ease
> things I'd appreciate if a DD steps forward and indicated his/her will
> to sponsor this package, to define clear goals and clear actions whats
> needed to get thi
Hello again,
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Fernando Lemos wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Fernando Lemos wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Fernando Lemos wrote:
>>> Dear mentors,
>>>
>>> I am looking for a spon
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:37:36PM +0100, Tobias Frost wrote:
>> The one warning -- empty-debian-diff -- is emitted as I also keep the debian
>> files in the git repository I use for development of solarpowerlog. Naturally
>> the diff
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Fernando Lemos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Fernando Lemos wrote:
>> Dear mentors,
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "synconv".
>>
>> * Package name : synconv
>> Ve
Hello,
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Fernando Lemos wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "synconv".
>
> * Package name : synconv
> Version : 1.1.1-1
> Upstream Author : Fernando Tarlá Cardoso Lemos
> * UR
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "synconv".
* Package name: synconv
Version : 1.1.1-1
Upstream Author : Fernando Tarlá Cardoso Lemos
* URL : https://github.com/fernandotcl/synconv
* License : GPL-3+
Section : sound
It bu
Paul,
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Paul Elliott
wrote:
>
>
> I tried to correct a ITP by sending email to 646...@bugs.debian.org but the
> email was rejected.
>
>> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
>> 646...@bugs.debian.org
>>
>> Technical details of permanent failu
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:59 AM, Paul Elliott
wrote:
>
> I quote from Debian Library Packaging guide
>> 2. -DEV package dependencies
>>
>> The -DEV package would usually declare Depends: relationship on all -DEV
>> packages for libraries that the library package directly depends upon,
>> wit
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 4:46 AM, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 09:03:07PM -0300, Fernando Lemos wrote:
>> Just to clarify, I find it concerning that we might be accepting
>> source uploads that don't come straight from upstream and don't match
>>
2011/7/22 Benoît Knecht :
> Hi Fernando,
>
> Fernando Lemos wrote:
>> 2011/7/22 Kilian Krause :
>> > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:36:51PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote:
>> >> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.21+dfsg-1 of my
>> >&
2011/7/22 Kilian Krause :
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:36:51PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote:
>> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.21+dfsg-1 of my
>> package "minidlna".
>> - dget
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/minidlna/minidlna_1.0.21+dfsg-1.dsc
>
> 1. Your upoad us
2011/5/1 Håkon Nessjøen :
> On 1 May 2011 03:08, Fernando Lemos wrote:
>> * In debian/rules, why exactly do you export DH_OPTIONS?
>
> This was added by the script, not me. So I have no idea.
I don't think that's required, I don't remember dh_make ever doing
tha
> On 01.05.2011 02:06, Håkon Nessjøen wrote:
>> I would really like for a DD to look at my package, and be my sponsor,
>> as I am eager to begin as an active package maintainer. This is
>> hopefully the first of many to come.
>
> I am no DD, so feel free to ignore my advises but I really like the i
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Reece Dunn wrote:
> The project builds a shared library, two executables and provides
> development API headers. At the moment, the output is all built into
> one deb file. I want to break this up so that it complies with debian
> packaging rules but I am not
Hi,
2011/3/30 Benoît Knecht :
[...]
> I had a look at your package, and here are the small issues I noticed:
>
> - In debian/copyright, the Format header should contain the versioned
> DEP5 URL [1]. And you could avoid repeating the BSD-2-clause license
> text by using a standalone license pa
r mounting
with udisks as non-root with the default configuration).
TIA,
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Fernando Lemos wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "udisks-glue".
>
> * Package name : udisks-glue
> Version : 1.3.0
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Aaron Todd wrote:
> Thanks for responding! I've tried the conf.d file as well and it give me
> the same errors. In any case, I've have other custom config files that I am
> going to need to overwrite/customize so my main question still applies. How
> do I g
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "udisks-glue".
* Package name: udisks-glue
Version : 1.3.0-1
Upstream Author : Fernando Tarlá Cardoso Lemos
* URL : https://github.com/fernandotcl/udisks-glue
* License : 2-clause BSD
Section :
2011/1/16 mezgani ali :
>
> What about README.Debian and README.source can i keep them empty and in the
> case when the tools comes with a
> readme.txt file ?
[snip]
Please make sure you read this (read it all if you haven't yet):
http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/
The things you are asking
Hi Dave,
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Dave Mateer wrote:
> - The application will have very limited appeal -- it is implementing a
> specific workflow for our organization, whose users are spread out across the
> world. Most of the documentation I am reading assumes you are putting
> some
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 7:20 PM, hungryh...@i2pmail.org
wrote:
[...]
> Note: There is one lintian warning:
> "W: i2p source: native-package-with-dash-version"
> I think this warning appears because the .tar.gz doesn't have ".orig" in
> its name. I haven't been able to figure out how to get dp
Hi, Christian,
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:35 AM, wrote:
[...]
> I already finished the package and tested it on my system.
>
> Now I'm in need of a sponsor to also test it, check it and upload it.
Cool, please upload to http://mentors.debian.net/ or somewhere else
and post the link so that other
Hi,
2010/11/4 Iker Salmón San Millán :
> first i have to rename the ITP and i've been looking how to do it but i
> haven't found.
Please read:
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control
In short, write something like this to cont...@b.d.o:
retitle 1234 RFP: My package here
thanks
You might wan
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> is the fact that the package uses dkms relevant for the end user? it
> seems as an implementation detail of the package to me, so I'd suggest
> to drop that suffix.
Not a good idea, seems like most (or all) DKMS packages current have
the -
Hi,
2010/11/3 Iker Salmón San Millán :
> I also have a question. If we (me, mentors, sponsors, DD, upstream...)
> finally decide to change the name i guess i should send a new itp bug with
> the new name and close this one, shouldn't I?
I believe you can just rename the ITP.
Regards,
--
To U
Hey,
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Marco Bavagnoli wrote:
> the url on sf.net is this:
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/googleimagedown/files/
>
> and source is named like mediadownloader_v1.4.2-src.tar.gz
> Is the watch file content correct ?
Take a look at uscan(1), there are examples for S
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Marco Bavagnoli wrote:
> I fixed most of the warning, but 1 of them and 1 information with a spelling
> error are still there.
>
> I run lintian -Ii on the .deb, as result I got this:
>
> W: mediadownloader: new-package-should-close-itp-bug
Please fix this, it
Hey,
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Marco Bavagnoli wrote:
> One question: when and if the package will be clear, will I need to delete
> the old package ? Or just make version 1.4.2-2 ?
Keep the version intact (1.4.2-1) and just dput it again. It'll
overwrite the old package.
Regards,
--
T
Hi,
2010/10/31 Enrique Hernández Bello :
>> This is your first release, and version 0.4.3b-1 makes sense to me as
>> the first debian packaging released.
>>
>
> If I don't increment the release number, I can't upload it to mentors
> repository. What do you suggest? What is the common way to versio
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Given that you're interested in ubuntu packages, you could have learnt
> what happens if source package name already exists and how to manage
> that on ubuntu side: I guess blacklisting as requested by Luca then
> proba
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> Il 26/10/2010 17.49, Gabriele Giacone ha scritto:
>> I'd like to keep ubiquity, name chosen by upstream.
>> And it's good because there are no packages named ubiquity in Debian.
>>
>> Derivatives can choose their own package names.
>
> Just
Hi,
2010/10/15 Benoît Knecht :
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "minidlna".
>
I'm not a DD or a DM, but here's my (very superficial) review, as I'm
mildly interested in this package.
* It seems that you are missing Build-Depends on libavcodec-dev and
libavutil-dev.
Hi Gustavo,
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 3:19 AM, gustavo panizzo
wrote:
>> > d) Create an user "udisks", add a PolicyKit rule to allow it to mount
>> > device files, use that for the init script (not even sure it's
>> > possible)
>> how would it leave the file permissions on the mounted filesystems
Hello, mentors
I'm looking for some advice on my ITP[1]. udisks-glue[2] is a
replacement to some of the functionality provided by halevt/ivman, but
it uses udisks instead of HAL (HAL is not actively maintained
anymore). So I'm trying to package it the same way halevt does it:
providing simple auto
Hey David,
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 2:10 PM, David Bremner wrote:
> I'm not a DD, but hopefully this review can make it easier to sponsor
> your package.
Thanks for your input, it's really appreciated.
> - It should be documented what extensions/formats are supported. I
> tried some m4a's and i
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "btag".
* Package name: btag
Version : 1.0.0-1
Upstream Author : Fernando Tarlá Cardoso Lemos
* URL : http://github.com/fernandotcl/btag
* License : BSD
Section : sound
It builds these binary p
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With upstream of daisy-player (ITP: #595292) I am working on getting a
> Daisy player for Daisy talking books into good shape. I am having
> concerns about the current "hack" of upstream to ensure the program is
> able to read from
51 matches
Mail list logo
