On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Reinhard Tartler <siret...@debian.org> wrote: > is the fact that the package uses dkms relevant for the end user? it > seems as an implementation detail of the package to me, so I'd suggest > to drop that suffix.
Not a good idea, seems like most (or all) DKMS packages current have the -dkms suffix (virtualbox-ose-dkms, blcr-dkms, nvidia-kernel-dkms, etc.). Regards, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=dcpeqmohz+uktahe1axw=v4f0s6ru+ah0u...@mail.gmail.com