On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 04:59:12PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 22:45:21 +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 5:36 AM, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > > On Sun, 26 Nov 2017 18:42:22 +, James Cowgill wrote:
> > >> I think you might need a "Restrictions: i
k first. I would
start by reading the material in the packaging-tutorial package that I pointed
to you. If you don't understand something, or need any type of help, just ask.
--
Antonio Terceiro
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:47:02AM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> I hope that ci.debian.net is configured in such a way it uses binary
> packages from the archive.
It is.
--
Antonio Terceiro
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
gist of it
> without needing to spend time looking anything else up!)
>
> On Sun, 16 Mar 2014 17:39:20 -0300, Antonio Terceiro
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 08:39:38PM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > > On Sun, 16 Mar 2014 15:41:15 -0300, Antonio Terceiro
> >
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 08:39:38PM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Mar 2014 15:41:15 -0300, Antonio Terceiro
> wrote:
> > not subscribed to debian-mentors, please Cc: me explicitly if you still
> > need my input.
>
> Noted, thanks for noticing :-).
Thanks to Jak
nstead of building everything. e.g. the ideal would be build
_only_ the unit test files (assuming they need to be built) and not all
the other code (since you are supposed to run the tests against the
installed version of the package)
HTH
--
Antonio Terceiro
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 11:06:27AM +0900, Satoru KURASHIKI wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> > Antonio Terceiro writes:
> >
> > > Our goal is to remove ruby1.8 and switch to ruby2.0 as the default,
> > > ASAP, s
[not subscribed to -mentors, please keep me in Cc: if this goes further]
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:23:09AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>
> > close 707300
> > thanks
> >
> > I will be sponsoring this package
close 707300
thanks
I will be sponsoring this package for Eriberto.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1369699625-2796-bts-terce...@debian.org
close 705360
thanks
I am sponsoring this package.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1369436923-1649-bts-terce...@debian.org
27;s not acceptable, you can also (at least for Wheezy) run the
script from debian/rules with `ruby1.8` instead of `ruby` and build
depend on ruby1.8 explicitly.
--
Antonio Terceiro
Index: debian/wn-for-goldendict.rb
===
--- debia
e the default gem2deb installation step,
something like this:
PACKAGES = \
oa-basic \
oa-core \
oa-enterprise \
oa-more \
oa-oauth \
oa-openid
override_dh_auto_install:
for pkg in $(PACKAGES); do dh_install -p ruby-$$pkg $$pkg/lib/*
/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby; done
dh_auto_install
Of course, you will need to add the appropriate binary package stanzas
to debian/control, and check the dependencies for each sub-package, and
make sure the tests for all of them are run during package build.
--
Antonio Terceiro
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
p for the pkg-ruby-extras project on alioth.
A few notes about your package:
You should not depend or require rubygems. Everything you need is
already in Debian.
Your debian/docs is empty; you should probably remove it.
The manpage you wrote is inside debian/, but since you are the
13 matches
Mail list logo
