On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 08:39:38PM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote: > On Sun, 16 Mar 2014 15:41:15 -0300, Antonio Terceiro <terce...@debian.org> > wrote: > > not subscribed to debian-mentors, please Cc: me explicitly if you still > > need my input. > > Noted, thanks for noticing :-).
Thanks to Jakub for pinging me on IRC about your email. :) > > >> Stephen Kitt <sk...@debian.org>, 2014-03-15, 14:53: > > > A local adt-run using an unstable chroot or qemu works, whether run from > > > the built or unbuilt source tree. But the tests fail on ci.debian.net; as > > > far as I can tell it doesn't try to build the source package before > > > running the tests, so they fail (see > > > http://ci.debian.net/data/unstable-amd64/packages/libe/libevdev/2014-03-14.log > > > for the last run). > > > > This is related to the way that the version of debci on ci.debian.net > > invokes adt-run. I am about to deploy a new version that does The Right > > Thing (TM) and should probably fix the issue you are seeing. > > Excellent! > > > > Jakub Wilk > > >> ==> debian/tests/control <== Tests: check Restrictions: > > >> needs-root build-needed rw-build-tree Depends: @builddeps@ > > > > > > It's probably unrelated to the problem you're observing, but this > > > Depends is certainly incorrect. The specification says that “tests > > > must test the INSTALLED version of the program”, but there is > > > nothing in Depends to ensure that the program is in fact > > > installed. > > > > ... this is an important point. You have to make sure that the any > > tests will run against the code that is _installed_ and not against > > the code that was just built. Also, it would be really nice on the > > test infrastructure if you could build strictly the bits you need to > > the tests instead of building everything. e.g. the ideal would be > > build _only_ the unit test files (assuming they need to be built) > > and not all the other code (since you are supposed to run the tests > > against the installed version of the package) > > Indeed, thanks to Jakub for pointing that out. I've reworked the > upstream tests to build using the installed package. > > Your point concerning building only the required bits effectively > means that we shouldn't use "build-needed" in the tests/control > "Restrictions" field, but manually control the build only for the > purposes of running the tests, am I right? most probably, yes. It's always a compromise. Sometimes it's reasonably easy to patch the upstream test suite to make it not expect locally-built binaries, not use local includes etc. Sometimes it may be a lot harder, so YMMV. -- Antonio Terceiro <terce...@debian.org>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
