On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 1:09 PM Romain Porte wrote:
> Uploaded a new version +dfsg.1-1 on mentors with your explanation in
> debian/copyright as suggested by Lintian.
Here is a review of the package:
There do not appear to be any further issues that would block the upload.
So I am willing to spo
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Control: block -1 by 976353
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pysolfc":
* Package name: pysolfc
Version : 2.10.1-1
Upstream Author : Shlomi Fish, https://www.shlomifish.org/
* URL : https://pyso
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-pysol-cards":
* Package name: python-pysol-cards
Version : 0.10.1-1
Upstream Author : Shlomi Fish, https://www.shlomifish.org/
* URL : https://github.c
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fonts-agave":
* Package name: fonts-agave
Version : 35-1
Upstream Author : type agaric
* URL : https://b.agaric.net/page/agave
* License : MIT
* V
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hacktv":
* Package name: hacktv
Version : 0+git20201203-1
Upstream Author : Philip Heron
* URL : https://github.com/fsphil/hacktv
* License : GPL-3+
Thank you Andrey and Matthew both for your replies. That makes a lot of
sense. It did not occur to me to check the compiler optimization level
as a suspect :-). I will work with upstream to devise a better check
for atomics, and after confirming that it works as expected with
different optimizat
Hi,
2020-12-03 05:40 CET, Paul Wise:
> The package (and upstream) is missing copyright and license
> information for all of the test fonts. Some of them contain no license
> information, so it isn't clear that they are legal for Debian (and
> upstream) to redistribute. There are no source files fo
7 matches
Mail list logo
