On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 07:23:33PM +, Michael P Vageline wrote:
> Your build error is from missing this file:
> > dpkg -S /usr/include/scsi/cxlflash_ioctl.h
> linux-libc-dev: /usr/include/scsi/cxlflash_ioctl.h
>
> Are you building using a kernel that is shipped with 17.10?
17.10 of what? Your
control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 9:55 PM, roucaries bastien
wrote:
> control: owner -1 ro...@debian.org
>
> I take it
>
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Julien Puydt
> wrote:
>> Package: sponsorship-requests
>> Severity: wishlist
>>
>> Dear mentors,
>>
>> I am looking f
control: owner -1 ro...@debian.org
I take it
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Julien Puydt wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-unicode-tr51"
>
> * Package name: node-unicode-tr51
>Version
Any news of dfsg version ?
We've finally manage to get a new upstream release, which is 1.9.1~rc1
We went for an rc1 because we want to have binary packages only once the source
are acceptable. So rc2 is planned to include only changes needed for
debian packaging.
Once the source is Ok for debian, the final release will be m
hi,
Your build error is from missing this file:
> dpkg -S /usr/include/scsi/cxlflash_ioctl.h
linux-libc-dev: /usr/include/scsi/cxlflash_ioctl.h
Are you building using a kernel that is shipped with 17.10?
> Why do both packages depend on some -dev packages?
> *fixed
Why does cxlflash depend on
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 03:56:59PM -0300, Rodrigo wrote:
> I was able to build from the link I sent to you using 'debuild -us -uc'.
> Could you share with us what's the error, please?
cflash_block_kern_mc.c:59:10: fatal error: scsi/cxlflash_ioctl.h: No such file
or directory
Besides, you should a
Hi,
> I don't really see any changes and also you haven't answered many of
my questions.
> Also, the package doesn't build. Please don't upload packages you haven't
> tested.
I was able to build from the link I sent to you using 'debuild -us -uc'.
Could you share with us what's the error, ple
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 06:36:21PM +, Michael P Vageline wrote:
> Why do both packages depend on some -dev packages?
> *fixed
Why does cxlflash depend on some -dev packages then?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
hi,
These are all fixed in the latest... once you get the correct updates.
I: cxlflash: package-contains-empty-directory usr/share/man/man3/
*fixed
I: cxlflash: unused-override hardening-no-fortify-functions
*fixed
/usr/share/cxlflash/readme.txt and maybe some other files should be
shipped
hi,
>Do I understand correctly that postinst touches /opt? Including /opt/bin?
>I'm not sure that's a good idea even if that's only for migration (and
>it's definitely a bad idea if anything in /opt is created on a clean
>system).
>As the maintainer script logic is very complex
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 02:54:18PM -0300, Rodrigo wrote:
> We've made some changes and uploaded it again, here is the link ->
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cxlflash/cxlflash_4.3.2520-1.dsc
I don't really see any changes and also you haven't answered many of my
questions.
Also, t
Hi Andrey,
We've made some changes and uploaded it again, here is the link ->
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cxlflash/cxlflash_4.3.2520-1.dsc
About the "non-free", how does it work? I mean, we have to change some
file in specific? (i.e. debian/control)
Thanks,
Rodrigo R. Gal
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 05:25:14PM +, Michael P Vageline wrote:
> > *the software for the firmware images will not be included
> Do you mean the images themselves won't be included?
>
> *the binary images are in the cxlflashimage package,
>but the source code won't be included.
Non-fre
hi,
> *the software for the firmware images will not be included
Do you mean the images themselves won't be included?
*the binary images are in the cxlflashimage package,
but the source code won't be included.
Regards,
Mike Vageline
IBM POWER Software Development
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 03:46:35PM +, Michael P Vageline wrote:
> *the software for the firmware images will not be included
Do you mean the images themselves won't be included?
> *we need to allow the click-to-accept license. It is a typical generic
> usage agreement. No fee.
>Our so
hi,
> >What are the binaries in src/build/install/resources/ext.tgz? Do they
> > have
> >sources?
> > *they are some specially built utilities with no source.
> Non-free then.
> I also wonder how does that work with both ppc64 and ppc64el
> architectures.
>
> *this is a current e
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 02:24:37PM +, Michael P Vageline wrote:
> >Do I understand correctly that postinst touches /opt? Including /opt/bin?
> >I'm not sure that's a good idea even if that's only for migration (and
> >it's definitely a bad idea if anything in /opt is created on a cl
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2017 15:56:51 +0200
with message-id <20170823135651.2evsebn3gyxqw...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#872571: RFS: injeqt/1.1.0-1.1 [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #872571,
regarding RFS: injeqt/1.1.0-1.1 [RC]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-unicode-tr51"
* Package name: node-unicode-tr51
Version : 9.0.0-1
Upstream Author : Mathias Bynens
* URL : https://mths.be/unicode-tr51
* License
close 872973 0.6.4-1
thanks
Sponsored by aron@ .
Thanks,
Boyuan Yang
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2017 14:12:23 +0200
with message-id <20170823121223.2sukmjnh7vbdi...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#872927: RFS: xpad/5.0.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #872927,
regarding RFS: xpad/5.0.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2017 13:58:36 +0200
with message-id <20170823115836.sbi2f5ynao55j...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#872929: RFS: re2c/1.0.1-1 -- tool for generating fast
C-based recognizers
has caused the Debian Bug report #872929,
regarding RFS: re2c/1.0.1-1 -- tool for gener
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2017 12:32:01 +0200
with message-id <20170823103200.vw5ynuikb2ddo...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#872961: RFS: gcc-6-doc/6.4.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #872961,
regarding RFS: gcc-6-doc/6.4.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2017 12:34:44 +0200
with message-id <20170823103444.ox6tokwogaumt...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#872962: RFS: gcc-7-doc/7.2.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #872962,
regarding RFS: gcc-7-doc/7.2.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2017 15:37:46 +0800
with message-id
and subject line Re: [Debian-zh-dev] Bug#872971: RFS: gmchess/0.29.6-3 [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #872971,
regarding RFS: gmchess/0.29.6-3 [RC]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 10:16:00PM +, Michael P Vageline wrote:
>hi,
> Thx for your prompt reviews. Here are some more answers:
Please don't send HTML emails.
>Do I understand correctly that postinst touches /opt? Including /opt/bin?
>I'm not sure that's a good idea even if t
27 matches
Mail list logo
