We've finally manage to get a new upstream release, which is 1.9.1~rc1 We went for an rc1 because we want to have binary packages only once the source are acceptable. So rc2 is planned to include only changes needed for debian packaging. Once the source is Ok for debian, the final release will be made upstream with the same sources of the last rc.
First of all: this bug refers to 1.9.0 but we are talking about 1.9.1 from now on, is a separate bug needed? > > > Patch headers should be in the DEP-3 format (lintian tells that). Done > > > doc/manual.html says it's autogenerated from a LyX source They are now generated from the lyx file, with the obvious addition of elyxer to the b-d. > > > The same for cyclograph/qt/cyclograph_rc.py which is pyrcc5-generated. The file is now generated by pyuicc, with the addition of pyqt4-dev-tools to the b-d. Also the gui files are edited by qt designer so the code generation has been included in the setup script, too. The same goes for gettext > > > The GUIs still have a "Check online" checkbox which is even on by default > > > even if it has no effect, it should be hidden. > > Ok, thanks for the care you are giving to this package. > > To fix this a patch or a new upstream release is required. Are both options > > acceptable? > Which both options? I was asking I a debian patch is acceptable to hide the checkbox. The other option is a new upstream implementing the change. Anyways we went for the second option to keep the debian patch short. -- Federico
