-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi!
Thank you for reviewing my package. I have overlooked it, but its very
important.
I modified it and re-uploaded the package to mentors.
Do you consider sponsoring it? As you might have seen in the ITP/RFS,
I plan to bring the whole abi-tracker
I think a non mounted proc is a bug, so probably you should fix the
autobuilders and your build environment?
The other issue is because of perl transition started yesterday.
I think things will be better in the next few days
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/perl.html
In the meanwhile yo
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:57:51PM +0100, Peter Spiess-Knafl wrote:
> As a first step I therefore packaged abi-monitor, which I am seeking a
> sponsor for.
Hi,
Please help to update the license to GPL-2 or LGPL-2, as describe in
copyright header and its LICENSE actully contains GPL-2 and LGPL-2.
Hi Jakub,
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 11:34:53PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Andreas Tille , 2015-12-17, 19:11:
> >override_dh_auto_build:
> >+ if mount | grep "^proc " ; then echo "proc mounted - fine"; else
> >mount proc /proc -t proc ; fi
>
> Well, you need root privileges to mount /proc,
* Andreas Tille , 2015-12-17, 19:11:
override_dh_auto_build:
+ if mount | grep "^proc " ; then echo "proc mounted - fine"; else mount
proc /proc -t proc ; fi
Well, you need root privileges to mount /proc, so doing it in
debian/rules almost certainly won't work.
If /proc is not mounted
Il 17/12/2015 18:44, Mattia Rizzolo ha scritto:
I'll sponsor it, if you just change this to things:
* debhelper version 9.0.0 never existed, neither 8.0.0 did. using (>= 9)
is more than enough.
* debian/copyright says 2001-2013, but I have to guess it exstends till
2015 too?
* debian/chang
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]
Dear mentors,
I am planning to bring the abi-tracker tool [1][2] to Debian, because I
think it can be very useful for maintainers of shared libraries.
As a first step I therefore packaged abi-moni
Your message dated Thu, 17 Dec 2015 20:59:55 + (UTC)
with message-id <1136203798.707865.1450385995053.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#808251: RFS: clblas/2.8+ds1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #808251,
regarding RFS: clblas/2.8+ds1-3
to be marked as done.
This means
Hi Mattia,
i had talked to Thibaut and I'am willing to took maintainership for this
packages,
currently i'am working on an new Upload to incorporate the review from
Gianfranco and the suggestions
he mention.
If i'am ready i will announce it for review on the debian-mentors mailinglist.
regar
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 08:29:30PM +0100, Tim Weippert wrote:
> Hi Mattia,
Hi Tim
(please avoid doing top posting...)
> i had talked to Thibaut and I'am willing to took maintainership for this
> packages,
> currently i'am working on an new Upload to incorporate the review from
> Gianfranco and
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "clblas"
* Package name: clblas
Version : 2.8+ds1-3
Upstream Author : Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
* URL : https://github.com/clMathLibraries/clBLAS
* License
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libirman"
* Package name: libirman
Version : 0.5.1
Upstream Author : Tom Wheeley
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/libirman/
* License : GPL
Hi Gianfranco,
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 05:45:19PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> I remember something ghc related
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=787227
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773768
Seems to be the same consequence as I've drawn below.
I remember something ghc related
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=787227
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773768
Cheers
G.
Gio 17/12/15, Andreas Tille ha scritto:
Oggetto: Re: cmake issue in libsbml: Cannot gener
Your message dated Thu, 17 Dec 2015 17:59:59 +
with message-id <20151217175959.gk1...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#808167: RFS: adjtimex/1.29-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #808167,
regarding RFS: adjtimex/1.29-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Control: owner -1 !
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 05:46:56PM +0100, Marco M. F. De Santis wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hoteldruid":
I'll sponsor it, if you just change this to things:
* debhelper version 9.0.0 never existed, neither 8.0.0 did. using (>=
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 06:42:36PM +0100, Thibaut Varène wrote:
> I suppose what I need is having people take over my packages and call
> it a day, tbh. With my upload rights revoked there’s not much meaning
> in being a DD.
Not really.
There are several active DDs who got their key removed due to
control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 01:45:02PM +0100, Gergely Pilisi wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "eclipse-titan":
Ok, first, a question: do you do your debian packaging in git?
And, here is a review:
* trailing whitespace on the changelog line.
* maybe you're
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hoteldruid":
* Package name: hoteldruid
Version : 2.1.3-1
Upstream Author : Marco M. F. De Santis
* URL : http://www.hoteldruid.com
* License : AGPLv3
Se
Hi Kevin,
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:44:40PM +1100, Kevin Murray wrote:
>
> I have pushed a possible fix to the branch 'daube/possible-cmake-fix'. I am
> not
> sure of the overall effects, the build is taking ages on my laptop, but it
> seems
> to have fixed the immediate error.
Thanks a lot f
On Monday 14 December 2015 12:37:24 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> On 14/12/15 12:33, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Friday 11 December 2015 18:04:06 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> >> > you just dropping the patch into the right place.
> > I know where and how. But I do not like idea to patching original source
> > co
Hi, as a start you might want to give some build logs or install logs.
I see you already ccd Alex, who did a first packaging work.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687543
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687620
unfortunately the package didn't get in unstable, so
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Alec,
(sorry again for the long wait, I was hoping somebody else was going to help in
this, but nobody seems to be caring about this package)
> * Non-maintainer upload.
> * First shot on major upstream updates.
> - Re-packaged from scr
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mkcast"
* Package name: mkcast
Version : 1.0.0-1
Upstream Author : a...@keyboardfire.com
* URL : https://github.com/KeyboardFire/mkcast
* License
Hi,
>So it must be done by hand: no facility has been implemented to say that
>a given indep package must be treated as arch package at buid stage ?
The indep builders might not even call the arch auto_build, so I presume it
is not implemented because it might just not even be called?
(not com
Hi,
I'm trying to fix libsbml bugs and while doing so upgrade to the latest
upstream version. Since the original tarball needs to be stripped I
moved the packaging from SVN to Git[1] (so please do not try debcheckout
which does not lead to the latest packaging status).
Unfortunately my attempt i
26 matches
Mail list logo
