Control: owner -1 !
Thanks
Hi Antti,
I'll take a look in th next few days.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "classified-ads":
* Package name: classified-ads
Version : 0.08-1
Upstream Author : Antti Järvinen
* URL : http://katiska.org/classified-ads/
* License
Hi,
Quoting gregor herrmann (2015-09-30 18:24:22)
> The last thing I heard about versioned Provides is that not all pieces of the
> infrastructure support it yet. (wanna-build or something was missing).
>
> I'd be more than happy to hear if this is all fixed by now.
dose3 (which is used to check
Hi Frank,
In my opinion if you need the tool, write it - don't worry about what
anybody else thinks. If other people want it as well then that's the
point to worry about distro support.
Cheers,
Roger
Jeffrey Walton writes:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 3:55 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Yeah, this is why I'd put a check into the Debian packaging to be sure
>> that the software was built this way and abort the build during the
>> check phase if it wasn't, with a big comment explaining the situation.
Hi,
> g++ -ggdb -O6 -DNDEBUG -I./protoobj -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat
> -Werror=format-security -o obj-opt-x86_64/test_spectrum_preprocess.o -c
> src/test_spectrum_preprocess.cc
> In file included from src/test_spectrum_preprocess.cc:8:0:
> src/records.h: In destructor 'RecordWriter::
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 08:28:17PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have started packaging Tide (a tandard tool for ass-spectroscopy) at
>
>git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/tide.git
>
> Unfortunately these days gcc is more picky about C++ syntax and I was
> running into
>
> g++ -g
> We try to minimize external dependencies (even a package maintainer is
> a dependency in the process). So we were hoping/looking for something
> like (its a C++ library):
>
> #if defined(PACKAGE_BUILD) && !defined(CRYPTOPP_INIT_PRIORITY)
> # pragma message "It is recommended you define CRYPTOPP_I
Hi,
I have started packaging Tide (a tandard tool for ass-spectroscopy) at
git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/tide.git
Unfortunately these days gcc is more picky about C++ syntax and I was
running into
g++ -ggdb -O6 -DNDEBUG -I./protoobj -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat
-Werror=for
Hej Gianfranco!
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 at 20:25:08 +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> You'll find the new upload at
>
> dget -x
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dropbear/dropbear_2015.68-1.dsc
Did you have time to look at the new upload yet? (Since you didn't take
ownership of the RFS
On 09/30/2015 05:39 PM, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Johannes Schauer wrote...
>
>> Quoting Christoph Biedl (2015-09-30 08:25:50)
>>> Personally, I'm not happy about adding extra magic to version numbers
>>> to identify binNMUs and would rather introduce a way to define a range
>>> of version numbers
On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:39:44 +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Johannes Schauer wrote...
> > in fact, this can already be done:
> >
> > Package: foo
> > Architecture: any
> > Version: 5.25-3+b1
> > Provides: foo (= 5.25-3)
>
> Oy! So what's the reason those who trigger binNMUs do not utlize this
>
Am 26.09.2015 um 16:49 schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna:
Thanks for this hint, and Gianfranco, also thanks for your answer,
especially the link. I should have stated more precisely that setop
shall be a command line tool. Python sets and combine are interesting
but not as much universal as I plan my
Johannes Schauer wrote...
> Quoting Christoph Biedl (2015-09-30 08:25:50)
> > Personally, I'm not happy about adding extra magic to version numbers
> > to identify binNMUs and would rather introduce a way to define a range
> > of version numbers a package satifies, like in
> >
> > | Version: 5.25
On 09/30/2015 12:13 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Jens Reyer , 2015-09-30, 03:20:
>> Depends:
>>ma_foreign (>= ${source:Version})
>>ma_foreign (<< ${source:Version}.1~)
>
> This is what Lintian recommends when you can't use the "=" dependency,
> but it might be too loose.
>
> The intention w
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 03:12:18PM -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
>> A quick look at the source for dh_installinit doesn't show much about
>> the '-p', nor '--remaining' options. Can you elaborate or point to
>> further docs?
> FWIW thos
Hi Everyone,
I have one last question related to packaging and installation. (I
hope it is the last question).
Crypto++ has test files. When they are run from $PWD, them they work
fine. After installation into, say, /usr/share/, they break because
the location is an implicit dependency. So the tw
* Jens Reyer , 2015-09-30, 03:20:
Depends:
ma_foreign (>= ${source:Version})
ma_foreign (<< ${source:Version}.1~)
This is what Lintian recommends when you can't use the "=" dependency,
but it might be too loose.
The intention was to include all binNMUs, but exclude newer sourceful
up
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 3:55 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Jeffrey Walton writes:
>
>> OK, thanks. We are working with László Böszörményi. He's been very
>> helpful.
>
>> But if László ever leaves Debian or stops Crypto++, then I loose my
>> contact and the path to ensure things are handled correctly
Jeffrey Walton writes:
> OK, thanks. We are working with László Böszörményi. He's been very
> helpful.
> But if László ever leaves Debian or stops Crypto++, then I loose my
> contact and the path to ensure things are handled correctly.
Yeah, this is why I'd put a check into the Debian packaging
> We would really, really prefer that you not do this, and instead work with
> whoever is packaging the library for Debian to add a test to the packaging
> rules themselves to be sure that they're built correctly.
>
> The reason for this is that Debian's packaging tools, by design, work
> exactly t
Hi,
Quoting Christoph Biedl (2015-09-30 08:25:50)
> Personally, I'm not happy about adding extra magic to version numbers
> to identify binNMUs and would rather introduce a way to define a range
> of version numbers a package satifies, like in
>
> | Version: 5.25-3+b1# upper bound
> |
22 matches
Mail list logo
