Your message dated Tue, 15 May 2012 04:50:52 +
with message-id <20120515045052.ga2...@master.debian.org>
and subject line
http://packages.qa.debian.org/a/apt-build/news/20120514T133245Z.html
has caused the Debian Bug report #668455,
regarding RFS: apt-build/0.12.43 QA - frontend to apt to buil
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:51:40AM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
Hi,
>
> this is a review of your package ipset.
>
> * Do not set "DM-Upload-Allowed: yes" on your own. It's your sponsor's
> domain to do so. It's hard enough to find sponsors as is, no need to
> scare off even more potential sponsors by
Hi Benoît,
Thanks for your review. Comments below:
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 3:22 AM, Benoît Knecht wrote:
> - In debian/changelog, you mention updating the standards version, but
>not the changes required; if there wasn't any, you should mention
>that in the changelog.
>
>Also, the
Le Tue, May 15, 2012 at 01:09:32AM +0200, Arno Töll a écrit :
> On 15.05.2012 00:26, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > when the NEW queue is long, this leaves us some time to make a pre-review to
> > ease the work of the FTP team, by reducing the number of errors they have to
> > deal with.
>
> how would
On 15.05.2012 00:26, Charles Plessy wrote:
> when the NEW queue is long, this leaves us some time to make a pre-review to
> ease the work of the FTP team, by reducing the number of errors they have to
> deal with.
how would you do that, given packages in NEW aren't publicly accessible
on purpose?
Hi Luca,
On 14.05.2012 13:48, Luca Capello wrote:
Changes since the last upload:
* Initial release (Closes: #614554).
>>>
>>> I would say that you should close this bug as well ;-)
>>
>> Should i close it now or only after package will be builded and
>> uploaded?
>
> I would add
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 672394 + moreinfo
Bug #672394 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: ipset/6.12.1-1 -- administration tool
for kernel IP sets
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> owner 672394 !
Bug #672394 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: ipset/6.12.1-1 -- administration tool
for ker
tags 672394 + moreinfo
owner 672394 !
thanks
Hi Neutrom,
this is a review of your package ipset.
* Do not set "DM-Upload-Allowed: yes" on your own. It's your sponsor's
domain to do so. It's hard enough to find sponsors as is, no need to
scare off even more potential sponsors by adding DMUA for p
Le Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:49:41PM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 09:57:42AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> > I notice that packages have not been taken from the queue for 3 weeks:
> >
> >http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
>
> I'd rather see a correlation to the fa
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel-ga...@lists.debian.org
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors and pkg-games folks,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hitori". This is a new
upstream release with translation updates and minor bugfixes.
* Package name: hitori
Versi
Hi Nick,
this is a shallow review of your package. Unfortunately I am lacking
experience with CDBS packages and your package is quite complex. Hence I
am unsure if I will sponsor it eventually. That said, I'd love to see
kismet in shape in Debian.
* Please clarify the license of these files in yo
Hi,
I uploaded updated package. There are such changes in it:
* compat level and debhelper version were increased to 8
(not to 9 because I still support packages for Ubuntu Oneiric)
* debian/control was updated:
- binary package was renamed to kde-config-gtk2-gtk3-styles
- binary p
Hello,
On Mon, 14 May 2012 20:01:51 +0200
Gergely Nagy wrote:
> On one hand, some sponsors prefer DEP5, and wouldn't spend time
> looking at non-DEP5 sponsor requests (I'm one of these, see my other
> reasons further along).
If a prospective sponsor prefers DEP5, I have nothing against that;
th
Le 14/05/12 16:31, Olе Streicher a écrit :
> Hi Thibaut,
Hi Ole,
> Thibaut Paumard writes:
>> Le 14/05/12 15:06, Olе Streicher a écrit :
>>> Some of the "out-of-date" excuses, however, result from the SONAME
>>> change (libcplcore12 --> libcplcore20), and I don't know hoe to handle
>>> them.
>
Hi!
I'd suggest we keep this to the bugreport, no need to Cc mentors:
whoever is interested, can post to the bug.
I haven't reviewed the whole bug log yet, but one part caught my attention:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Andrew Shadura wrote:
>> > > * You should also consider using DEP5 for
Hello,
On Mon, 14 May 2012 07:44:02 -0400
Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> > > * Please use dpkg-statoverride rather then that rules override
> > > you've got in there, since you can have some problems on upgrade,
> > > etc.
> > How it that going to help? It's build-time thing, it doesn't
> > matter,
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "foremost"
* Package name: foremost
Version : 1.5.7-2
Upstream Author : Jesse Kornblum
Kris Kendall
Nick Mikus
* URL : htt
* Adam Borowski [120514 14:54]:
> Typically it's XCF or PSD files that are the preferred form of modification
> for images,
That depends heavily on what data there is. A XCF without any layers
or more colors or anything else but pixel information is as good as
any pixel format for storing, so any
Hi Thibaut,
Thibaut Paumard writes:
> Le 14/05/12 15:06, Olе Streicher a écrit :
>> Some of the "out-of-date" excuses, however, result from the SONAME
>> change (libcplcore12 --> libcplcore20), and I don't know hoe to handle
>> them.
> As part of the transition, libcpl*12 will be removed from t
Le 14/05/12 15:06, Olе Streicher a écrit :
> Some of the "out-of-date" excuses, however, result from the SONAME
> change (libcplcore12 --> libcplcore20), and I don't know hoe to handle
> them.
As part of the transition, libcpl*12 will be removed from the archive,
which will suppress this "excuse"
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 09:57:42AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> I notice that packages have not been taken from the queue for 3 weeks:
>
>http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
I'd rather see a correlation to the fact that some members of the
ftpmaster team might be short in time for private
Le 14/05/12 15:06, Olе Streicher a écrit :
>> To work on the build failures, you will need to:
>> - read the build [logs];
>> - ask for a [guest] account on the portboxes.
>> [logs] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=cpl
>> [guest] http://dsa.debian.org/doc/guest-account/
>
> Sin
Hi Thibaut,
Thibaut Paumard writes:
> Le 14/05/12 11:15, Olе Streicher a écrit :
>> could someone give me a hint on how to proceed here?
> The release team will answer your [request] soon and let you know
> whether it's OK to transition your packages. In the meantime you could
> upload them to ex
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 11:37:31AM +0200, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> Next I'm going to package the jPlayer skins (Blue Monday and Pink
> Flags). I'm not exactly versed in licenses for artwork but MIT/GPL for
> a GIF animation and PSD files looks wrong.
Typically it's XCF or PSD files that are th
Le 14/05/12 11:15, Olе Streicher a écrit :
> Dear mentors,
>
> could someone give me a hint on how to proceed here?
Dear Ole,
The release team will answer your [request] soon and let you know
whether it's OK to transition your packages. In the meantime you could
upload them to experimental to se
Hi Alexander!
Re-adding the BTS, please keep it in the loop if you are replying
questions that could be important (in this case the difference with
similar software is).
On Sun, 13 May 2012 02:16:23 +0200, Alexander Golovko wrote:
> On Fri, 11 May 2012 10:46:02 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
>> Given
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:01:52AM +0200, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, 13 May 2012 21:45:10 -0400
> Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>
> > * Please use dpkg-statoverride rather then that rules override
> > you've got in there, since you can have some problems on upgrade, etc.
>
> How it t
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Damien Raude-Morvan
wrote:
> Le lundi 14 mai 2012 00:33:07, Pau Garcia i Quiles a écrit :
> [...]
>> A new version of the packaging, hopefull the final one, is available
>> from mentors:
>>
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jquery-jplayer/jquery-jplay
Dear mentors,
could someone give me a hint on how to proceed here?
debian-de...@liska.ath.cx (Olе Streicher) writes:
> Tobias Frost writes:
>> For soname changes you probably wanted to set up a transition.
>> http://wiki.debian.org/OngoingTransitions
>> (Usually that should be done before the up
Hello,
On Sun, 13 May 2012 21:45:10 -0400
Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> * Please use dpkg-statoverride rather then that rules override
> you've got in there, since you can have some problems on upgrade, etc.
How it that going to help? It's build-time thing, it doesn't matter, I
guess.
> * You sh
30 matches
Mail list logo
