Le 14/05/12 16:31, Olе Streicher a écrit : > Hi Thibaut, Hi Ole,
> Thibaut Paumard <mlotpot.n...@free.fr> writes: >> Le 14/05/12 15:06, Olе Streicher a écrit : >>> Some of the "out-of-date" excuses, however, result from the SONAME >>> change (libcplcore12 --> libcplcore20), and I don't know hoe to handle >>> them. > >> As part of the transition, libcpl*12 will be removed from the archive, >> which will suppress this "excuse" (so don't worry for that yet). > > Can't I remove them myself (together with the old esorex and python-cpl > versions) when they all are in unstable? > Actually the removal from SID should occur automatically: http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals But the removal from testing is part of the transition and managed by the release team. In any case, the package won't migrate until you have resolved the FTBFS: that's the real problem at hand. >> However, I don't get the deal will libcext-dev: why is it still at 5.3.1 >> whereas libcext0 has been updated to 0.6? > > The cause for the RC bug is just that I accidently removed the > libcext-dev section from the debian/control file. Simply re-inserting > does the job (already done in the git repository; not uploaded yet > because of the unresolved FTBS). You should include this information in the bug report and tag it "pending". Regards, Thibaut. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fb14b23.3040...@free.fr
