Matt Zagrabelny writes:
> Thanks for the hint, Gergely. Unfortunately the man page, in
> particular the EXAMPLES section, does not address my *initial*
> question (AFAIK):
>
> ---{original question}---
> Is there an easy way to tell "dh" that it should
> use Makefile.linux instead of Makefile?
>
Dear mentors,
Update from NMU version.
tpb - program to use the IBM ThinkPad(tm) special keys
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/tpb
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
The SGML/XML team are looking for a new maintainer for expat, if you
were willing to join the team you would probably find sponsors there:
http://bugs.debian.org/660681
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "expat"
* Package name: expat
Version : 2.1.0-1
Upstream Author : fdrake, kwaclaw
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/expat/
* License : MIT
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 04:45:39PM -0500, Michael Shuler wrote:
> All of this can be done with preseeding d-i, as well as much, much more,
For a years there was problem to make partitionable and bootable raid
> when you consider including pre- and/or post-install scripting from your
The main po
On 04/04/2012 04:10 PM, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 10:51:16PM +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote:
>
>> Out of curiosity, what were your problems with d-i, that couldn't have
>> been fixed via patches to d-i, that could only be solved by writing a
>
> First was software raid restri
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Gergely Nagy
wrote:
> Matt Zagrabelny writes:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> I am packaging up milter-regex. The upstream source has three makefiles:
>>>
>>> Makefile
>>> Makefile.linux
>>> Makefile.solaris
>>>
>
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 10:51:16PM +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> Out of curiosity, what were your problems with d-i, that couldn't have
> been fixed via patches to d-i, that could only be solved by writing a
First was software raid restrictions, then partitioning (logical volumes
and file system c
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 10:04:03PM +0200, Didier Raboud wrote:
> Have you reported your insatisfaction (think: bugreports)?
No. It has no sense, because of total insatisfaction.
> That's how debian-installer currently works
It is custom solution. By default it is dedicated CD.
> > It fully sup
Vladimir Stavrinov writes:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 09:11:03PM +0200, Didier Raboud wrote:
>
>> Debian already has one component named the Debian Installer [0,1], which is
>
> As usual, I was not satisfied with it and hence wrote my own installer
Out of curiosity, what were your problems with
Matt Zagrabelny writes:
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I am packaging up milter-regex. The upstream source has three makefiles:
>>
>> Makefile
>> Makefile.linux
>> Makefile.solaris
>>
>> The file, "Makefile", is for building in a BSD environment. If
Le mercredi, 4 avril 2012 21.24:08, Vladimir Stavrinov a écrit :
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 09:11:03PM +0200, Didier Raboud wrote:
> > Debian already has one component named the Debian Installer [0,1], which
> > is
>
> As usual, I was not satisfied with it and hence wrote my own installer
Have you
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 09:11:03PM +0200, Didier Raboud wrote:
> Debian already has one component named the Debian Installer [0,1], which is
As usual, I was not satisfied with it and hence wrote my own installer
> a completely new package (not suitable for generic installations) being named
I
Vladimir;
Le mercredi, 4 avril 2012 20.38:45, Vladimir Stavrinov a écrit :
>
> > ...). I do not think it is suitable for Debian.
>
> Great! Debian installer is not "suitable for Debian"!
Debian already has one component named the Debian Installer [0,1], which is
the official way to install D
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 05:42:46PM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> I do not believe running apt-get dist-upgrade non-interactive is a good
"not good idea ..." Again, it is running every day on lot of production
servers for a ten years. Some time, I do rollback, because it preserve
old packages.
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 12:55:32PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
> Le 04/04/2012 06:38, Adam Borowski a écrit :
>
> > Should I be rather Lintian correct, or what-seems-to-be-right correct?
>
> Reading the long description usually helps:
>
> > $ lintian-info --tags changelog-should-mention-qa
> > W:
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 05:17:06PM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> >From a quick look it looks like it configures everything in a very
^^
Please, take a time to learn more. Try to use it, before make conclusion.
Here is bootable iso image, including this script:
http://sourcefo
Le 04/04/2012 06:38, Adam Borowski a écrit :
> Should I be rather Lintian correct, or what-seems-to-be-right correct?
Reading the long description usually helps:
> $ lintian-info --tags changelog-should-mention-qa
> W: changelog-should-mention-qa
> N:
> N: If this upload is to orphan this pack
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I am packaging up milter-regex. The upstream source has three makefiles:
>
> Makefile
> Makefile.linux
> Makefile.solaris
>
> The file, "Makefile", is for building in a BSD environment. If I specify
>
> make -f Makefile.linux
On 04/04/2012 04:06 PM, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote:
> updeb - Non-interactive upgrade Debian system
I do not believe running apt-get dist-upgrade non-interactive is a good
idea... Also there is already unattended-upgrades in the archive if you
want to automatically install security updates.
Ans
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 667506 + wontfix
Bug #667506 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: install-debian/2.1.3 [NEW] -- command
line installs Debian system non-interactively
Added tag(s) wontfix.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
-
tag 667506 + wontfix
thanks
On 04/04/2012 04:16 PM, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote:
> install-debian - This command line utility installs Debian system
> non-interactivel
>From a quick look it looks like it configures everything in a very
specific way (including installing init scripts for non-Deb
Greetings,
I am packaging up milter-regex. The upstream source has three makefiles:
Makefile
Makefile.linux
Makefile.solaris
The file, "Makefile", is for building in a BSD environment. If I specify
make -f Makefile.linux
things build nicely. Is there an easy way to tell "dh" that it should
use
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "updeb"
* Package name: updeb
Version : 1.0.3
Upstream Author : Vladimir Stavrinov
* URL : http://sourcefor
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "install-debian"
* Package name: install-debian
Version : 2.1.3
Upstream Author : Vladimir Stavrinov
* URL :
Hi Ansgar,
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 09:22:17AM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [ I have no intention to sponsor this package. ]
No problem, thanks for commenting on the packaging!
> Raoul Borenius writes:
> > * License : custom license which is not considered free (see
> >
Vladimir Stavrinov writes:
> First of all in most cases it is using on workstation where are no other
> live users then You (or hacker breached into Your system) . Second, it
> is used sporadically and rarely. To catch those passwords You need
> continuously watching and analyze process list for a
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 01:41:43PM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> We also have pwgen which "generates pronounceable passwords" according
> to its man page.
As You can see, it is first utility mentioned here in this thread before apg,
and
again, I have used it too before apg. But it generates e
On 04/04/2012 01:09 PM, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote:
> I've used apg few years ago, but was not satisfied with it. That is
> exactly why I have started to write my own alternative. The main point
> was pronounceability.
We also have pwgen which "generates pronounceable passwords" according
to its man
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 01:39:07PM +0300, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
> I think rpg is very insecure since all local users of the system can see
> the passwords that you generate. All they need to do is to look for the
> "grep" commands that appear in the process list.
First of all in most cases
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 12:22:44PM +0200, Bartosz FeÅski wrote:
> So basically this is another tool like the apg?
> http://packages.debian.org/sid/apg
I've used apg few years ago, but was not satisfied with it. That is
exactly why I have started to write my own alternative. The main point
was pr
Il giorno mer, 04/04/2012 alle 11.36 +0200, gregor herrmann ha scritto:
> On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 11:14:28 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>
> > dget uses dscverify to check the signature. dscverify only uses the
> > debian-keyring.gpg and debian-maintainers.gpg keyrings located in
> > /usr/share/keyr
Hi, Elena and all
Elena ``of Valhalla'' wrote:
> On 2012-03-27 at 18:39:11 +0400, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> > Can I please upload the updated version to mentors.d.n?
>
> I don't think I will be able to do it before thursday, but
> I'll upload it as soon as I can.
Dimitry told me the package was
Vladimir Stavrinov writes:
> To advantage of this utility points it's name: "READABLE password
> generator". If You can read (i.e. to pronounce), then it is easy for
> remembering. But "readable" doesn't means "weak" - it is strong enough
> as long as dictionary is available for consulting to excl
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 01:21:55AM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
> On 04.04.2012 01:19, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > Lintian now complains: W: tcng source: changelog-should-mention-qa
> > but this seems wrong -- it's this very upload that is orphaning the
> > package; lintian has no real way to know that, t
W dniu 04.04.2012 12:17, Vladimir Stavrinov pisze:
> To advantage of this utility points it's name: "READABLE password
> generator". If You can read (i.e. to pronounce), then it is easy for
> remembering. But "readable" doesn't means "weak" - it is strong enough
> as long as dictionary is available
To advantage of this utility points it's name: "READABLE password
generator". If You can read (i.e. to pronounce), then it is easy for
remembering. But "readable" doesn't means "weak" - it is strong enough
as long as dictionary is available for consulting to exclude words from
out of there.
--
On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 11:14:28 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> dget uses dscverify to check the signature. dscverify only uses the
> debian-keyring.gpg and debian-maintainers.gpg keyrings located in
> /usr/share/keyrings by default, so it will not see any keys you imported
> unless you tell it to
Hi,
On 04/04/2012 10:12 AM, cento wrote:
> I try to "dget -x " his *.dsc, after import the right public key (ID
> AB0B0354), but it show me always the gpgkey error say is not possible to
> verify the sign. What is wrong?
dget uses dscverify to check the signature. dscverify only uses the
debian-
2012/4/4 cento :
> I try to "dget -x " his *.dsc, after import the right public key (ID
> AB0B0354), but it show me always the gpgkey error say is not possible to
> verify the sign. What is wrong?
My public key is not signed by any trustee and uploaded.
I guess that's why you get that error.
--
Hi to all,
Il giorno mer, 04/04/2012 alle 08.23 +0200, Tobias Eliasson ha scritto:
> Dear mentors,
[..]
> To access further information about this package, please visit the
> following URL:
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/quickrd
I try to "dget -x " his *.dsc, after import the right public k
41 matches
Mail list logo
