Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2-5
of my package "gstm".
It builds these binary packages:
gstm - SSH tunnel manager for GNOME
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 501940
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
-
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "teseq".
* Package name: teseq
Version : 1.0.0-1
Upstream Author : Micah Cowan
* URL : http://www.gnu.org/software/teseq/
* License : GPLv3+
Section : devel
It builds these binary packages:
tese
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> They are confusing indeed. It would be better if it was written "...
> that they exit with a zero return status if everything went well."
>
> Comments, your could a wishlist bug be filled suggesting this wording
> change?
No need, I just changed
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do we really need to waste our time on this kind of package when we
> should actually be trying to get Lenny out?
Please (everyone) stop making this false dilemma.
It is based on the false assumption that if action A is not taken
(e.g. not inspecting o
On Tuesday 04 November 2008 23:56:11 Reijo Tomperi wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cppcheck".
>
> * Package name: cppcheck
> Version : 1.25-1
> Upstream Authors: Daniel Marjamäki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reijo Tomperi <[EMAIL PR
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 20:59 +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du mardi 04 novembre 2008, vers 18:39,
> Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait :
> This kind of service is really useful for users that keep sending large
> piece of data through mail servers and then
Giuseppe Iuculano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You spend a lot of your free time, and you get an answer from a DD
> that no one needs your package except the maintainer (you). At this
> point I ask myself why I should continue and waste my time. This is
> what I mean with "I lost my interest". Th
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cppcheck".
* Package name: cppcheck
Version : 1.25-1
Upstream Authors: Daniel Marjamäki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reijo Tomperi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://cppcheck.wiki.sourceforge.net/
* Lice
markus schnalke ha scritto:
> Hmm ... you lost your interest ... within one day?!
> After only one person asked for some reasons of your intention.
>
> What do you think, you'll do if you maintain the package and problems
> come up ... leave?
>
>
> Think about it.
Finding a sponsor isn't exact
[2008-11-04 20:47] Giuseppe Iuculano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> So, I really don't understand your "Sounds like another package
> that no-one needs in Debian, except the maintainer" sentence, and I really
> don't
> understand what I should justify.
Having a new package means more work for the proje
Salut Vincent,
> Uploaded. Sorry for the delay.
Thanks.
Alexander
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OoO En ce début de soirée du dimanche 26 octobre 2008, vers 21:35,
Alexander Bürger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait :
> dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fig2sxd/fig2sxd_0.20-1.dsc
Uploaded. Sorry for the delay.
--
/* Fuck me gently with a chainsaw... */
2.0.38 /usr/src/
OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du mardi 04 novembre 2008, vers 18:39,
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait :
>> F*EX is not an anonymous service, the admin must register the user with
>> his e-mail address and auth-ID string. This task must be done with the CLI
>> program "fac" (F*EX admin
Neil Williams ha scritto:
>
> It was only my point of view, giving some idea of why I (and by the
> looks of it, other sponsors) ignored the first request. If you don't
> feel that you can justify the ITP, feel free to close it.
>
If you search "send big files" with google, you will find *a lot*
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 19:02 +0100, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> Neil Williams ha scritto:
>
> > Missing line here:
> >
> > Language: (C, C++, Perl, PHP, etc.) which?
> >
> > This line is not optional.
>
> I used the default template on mentors.debian.net.
Has that line been dropped?
Neil Williams ha scritto:
> Missing line here:
>
> Language: (C, C++, Perl, PHP, etc.) which?
>
> This line is not optional.
I used the default template on mentors.debian.net.
[...]
>> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
>
> I can't see any point, myself. So
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fex".
* Package name: fex
Version : 20081028-1
Upstream Author : Ulli Horlacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://fex.rus.uni-stuttgart.de/
* License : GPL
Section : web
It builds these binary
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 18:15 +0100, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fex".
(Note: I'm not even slightly interested in sponsoring the package, I'm
just giving some reasons why the first attempt was ignored and the
second attempt is heading the
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 8:22 PM, David Faerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i need use asterisk 1.4.21 which is in intrepid but my system is hardy...
> there is 1.4.17 for hardy but it is a bit old...
> i tried to change the control file (debian/control) in the 1.4.21 whit
> the control file from 1
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 12:22, David Faerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> hi
> i need use asterisk 1.4.21 which is in intrepid but my system is hardy...
> there is 1.4.17 for hardy but it is a bit old...
> i tried to change the control file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi
i need use asterisk 1.4.21 which is in intrepid but my system is hardy...
there is 1.4.17 for hardy but it is a bit old...
i tried to change the control file (debian/control) in the 1.4.21 whit
the control file from 1.4.17 but it didn't work
what ca
21 matches
Mail list logo
