On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 03:19:27AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You cant generate passwords with only numbers in it with pwgen.
Sounds like a chance for a feature enhancement you could make.
> But maybe pwgen is better i dont know. My program cant generate
> PWs with only letters at time.
>
You cant generate passwords with only numbers in it with pwgen.
But maybe pwgen is better i dont know. My program cant generate
PWs with only letters at time.
And by the way, i found a bug in pwgen with the following syntax:
$ pwgen -s -B -1 10 3
it looks like this:
32
dsl450fls2
lf03j4n59d
..so t
The password length is set to 5 cause passwords with 4 signs and lower are not
very secure.
I just wanted to give these programs as a gift like said, so if they are
unwanted just say it.
I know they are nothing special cause my skills are poor. They were just a
"thanks" not more.
It was not my w
Ok, so i was too stupid to figure out. Thanks for the tips. So the only
difference is that my tool
dont need pipes. So if it is not good enough for debian just say it and
everything is fine.
> Uhm...
>
> $ pwgen -h 2>&1 |head -1
> Usage: pwgen [ OPTIONS ] [ pw_length ] [ num_pw ]
>
> $ pwgen -
Sorry, yes, with pwgen x y > e, e has the same file syntax like my programs
*.txt file
> 4044:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] pwgen 5 1
> aeT5a
> 4045:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] pwgen 5 2
> Cha1w OhS0z
> 4046:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] pwgen 4 2
> h8Xr 1fG4
> 4047:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~] pwgen 4 2 > e
> 4048:[EMAIL
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 11:01:57PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
> I'm looking for a program like 'what' on BSD, but on Linux (obviously).
This is more a question for debian-user. But I'll say that a bit of shell
plumbing would probably get you what you want:
strings $file | grep '^\$.*\$$'
Of cou
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 11:33:43PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > How does pag compare to pwgen (http://sourceforge.net/projects/pwgen/)?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > tony
>
> Hi Tony,
>
> yes, i tested pwgen in thought the same. Pwgen has no option to create a
> password list and you cant set the l
Ok, thanks. But my tool dont need pipes and my pw.txt file looks like this:
password01
pass02
andmore
pwgen output file looks likes:
password pass02 andmore
My file you can use as a word list to a brute force proof of concept or for my
tool rarbrute and other tools like this. Like said, my tool d
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-17 23:33]:
> yes, i tested pwgen in thought the same. Pwgen has no option to
> create a password list and you cant set the length of the
> password(s). My program has more options i would say. I cant even
> move the output from pwgen to a file with a
PS: When i use a pipe with pwgen for the output of this program i only have one
password
in that file. So i would need an extra shell script to get a complete list. My
tool solves all
this without pipes, scripts and so on
Cheers,
acid
> Hello Acid0,
>
> How does pag compare to pwgen (http://s
> Hello Acid0,
>
> How does pag compare to pwgen (http://sourceforge.net/projects/pwgen/)?
>
> Cheers,
> tony
Hi Tony,
yes, i tested pwgen in thought the same. Pwgen has no option to create a
password
list and you cant set the length of the password(s). My program has more options
i would say.
Dear mentors,
I'm looking for a program like 'what' on BSD, but on Linux (obviously).
The following is taken from the man page:
what - show what versions of object modules were used to construct a
file
Sample run:
$ what /bsd
/bsd
$arla: xfs_common-bsd.c,v 1.25 2002/12/18 16:32:03 lha
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 13:01, Philipp Benner wrote:
> Don't think that your dictionary depends on the cpu arch (at least
> hunspell-de-de doesn't), so you should change "Architecture: any" to
> "Architecture: all" in debian/control.
Fixed.
> Anyhow, you should change your debian/rules to build only
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lisaac".
* Package name: lisaac
Version : 0.84-1
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://isaacos.loria.fr/li.html
* License : Cecillv2 (compatible GPL)
http://www.cecill.info/licences/Licence_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> - pag -
> The second program is pag - a password generator written in c. It can
> generate numbers,
> signs or both together, so 3 options. You can set the length of the password.
> You can
> generate just on password to stdout or a complete password list in a *.txt
>
Thanks Gregor and everybody for the answers.
The MSword document is a manual of 64 pages, so txt2html is a bit lost
in the structure of the document: small titles tend to look like big
ones.
I think that I will provide a PDF, and ship the .doc files (as I they
are the source...). Also, there are
On Sunday 17 September 2006 15:19, Christoph Haas wrote:
> > 3) In general, is there a policy about MSWord documents?
>
> I don't think there is a clear policy. But since the format is proprietary
> I wouldn't put it into a Debian package anyway. I would suggest you remove
> that documents from th
gregor herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TTBOMK MS Office files don't contain any fonts (that's why they often look
> suboptimal if used on a machine where the referenced fonts are
> missing).
I believe there is[1] an option in MSWord to embed the fonts in a
document. But since it's an option
Thank you very much George. I hope i will understand all the stuff i need.
Best greetings, blessings and wishes,
acid
___
Viren-Scan für Ihren PC! Jetzt für jeden. Sofort, online und kostenlos.
Gleich testen! http://www.pc-sic
On Sunday 17 September 2006 15:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi guys from the Debian Developer Team,
Hello acid,
> i am a little open software developer and wanna ask you if you would like
> to have two of my project for debian, so for the debian ports collection.
This is of course cool ;-).
H
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 13:10:19 +
Mashrab Kuvatov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've filed an ITP bug report #387824 for hunspell-uz and uploaded the files
> I've built into
> http://www.uni-bremen.de/~kmashrab/uzbek-word-list/hunspell-uz-0.6.deb.tar.bz2
Don't think that your dictio
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 19:19:09 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I am working on a package which contains MSWord documents. I was wondering
> the following questions:
> 1) How can I know if they are redistributable at all, for instance if
> they contain non-free fonts?
TTBOMK MS Office files don't co
Hi,
Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) How can I know if they are redistributable at all, for instance if
> they contain non-free fonts? In the worst case, do I have to repackage
> the sources as well?
I'll leave that to the real experts on the matter.
> 2) There are simple text ver
Hi, Charles...
On Sunday 17 September 2006 12:19, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I am working on a package which contains MSWord documents. I was
> wondering the following questions:
>
> 1) How can I know if they are redistributable at all, for instance if
> they contain non-free fonts? In the worst case
Hi guys from the Debian Developer Team,
i am a little open software developer and wanna ask you if you would like to
have two
of my project for debian, so for the debian ports collection.
- rarbrute -
The first program is a shell script, it is called rarbrute. It is a program to
brute force
RAR
Charles Plessy wrote:
(Not a DD but in NM.)
> 2) There are simple text versions of those documents
Then, I'd say, dump the original format and distribute files that users
can actually use. You can stick the originals on a project website if
there is some reason to do so.
>, but they have many
>
Hi all,
I've filed an ITP bug report #387824 for hunspell-uz and uploaded the files
I've built into
http://www.uni-bremen.de/~kmashrab/uzbek-word-list/hunspell-uz-0.6.deb.tar.bz2
Building stuff is based on hunspell-de-de. This is an output of lintian:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/deb/hunspell-uz$ lintia
Right, that's because it was new and your source package was not built
with '-sa', and I also didn't realise that. I've now rebuilt it to also
include the .orig.tar.gz and reuploaded.
I thought I have built with '-sa'; anyhow, now the package is in NEW
queue: let's hope this time it will be acce
On Sun, 2006-09-17 at 11:52 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Thanks for your help, but the package has been "Rejected:
> anymeal_0.29-3-2.dsc refers to anymeal_0.29-3.orig.tar.gz, but I can't
> find it in the queue or in the pool." :)
Right, that's because it was new and your source package was no
Dear mentors,
I am working on a package which contains MSWord documents. I was wondering
the following questions:
1) How can I know if they are redistributable at all, for instance if
they contain non-free fonts? In the worst case, do I have to repackage
the sources as well?
2) There are simple
Hi Thijs,
Thanks, I've uploaded the package.
Thanks for your help, but the package has been "Rejected:
anymeal_0.29-3-2.dsc refers to anymeal_0.29-3.orig.tar.gz, but I can't
find it in the queue or in the pool." :)
Sandro
--
Sandro Tosi (aka Morpheus, matrixhasu)
My (little) site: http:
Hello,
FYI: that has been uploaded to NEW queue. Thanks to Tony Mancill.
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18
fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2006-09-17 at 02:12 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "anymeal". This is the
> second RFS about this package: the first sponsorship got rejected by
> ftpmaster due to missing license note about images (this pkg should
> solve this issue).
Thanks, I've up
33 matches
Mail list logo
