Jamie Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 13:27 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
>
>>On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 02:30:50PM +1000, Jamie Jones wrote:
>>
>>>In the event of any license related issues perhaps caused by
>>>mis-translation, the Japanese version is the canonical version that must
>>>be followe
Yaroslav Halchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I don't see anything which requires debian/ directory to be absent
> from the orig.tar.gz
You are right, there is no such "law". But still it's a bad idea.
> especially if a package maintainer is the upstream.
This isn't an argument for inclus
> > > You need to remove debian/ directory form fslint_2.15.orig.tar.gz file in
> > > order to produce non Debian native package!
> > Could you please point me where it is *required* (to address "need
> > to") that upstream sourced do not include debian/?
> > I fully understand, that
> from http:/
> > developer's signature on the package to be accepted in the official
> > repositories - just a security measure.
> cool, So I'll need to register my signature as a Debian Developer.
> I'll figure out how to do this thanks.
(Un)fortunately becoming a debian developer is a long term step, for now
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 10:07:04AM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Christoph Haas wrote:
> > On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 04:15:09PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> cool, So I'll need to register my signature as a Debian Developer.
> I'll figure out how to do this thanks.
Uhm, you would need to become a De
Dear Customer,
The blueyonder anti-virus system found a virus in this message which it
was unable to clean and all infected attachments have been deleted.
This is an automated message - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE AS
THIS MAILBOX IS NOT MONITORED.
For further online security information
"Jamie Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Only if an adequate
English version was available [1], pruning the Japanese docs would be
an option IMO (and only because ~99.9% of Japanese people have good
command of English).
You must have a very different exper
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 13:27 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 02:30:50PM +1000, Jamie Jones wrote:
> > In the event of any license related issues perhaps caused by
> > mis-translation, the Japanese version is the canonical version that must
> > be followed.
>
> Isn't this the c
Christoph Haas wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 04:15:09PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>
>>Justin Pryzby wrote:
>>
>On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:06:33PM +0100, P?draig Brady wrote:
As far as I can see you want me to provide:
fslint_2.15-1.dsc
fslint_2.15-1.orig.tar.gz
f
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 02:30:50PM +1000, Jamie Jones wrote:
> In the event of any license related issues perhaps caused by
> mis-translation, the Japanese version is the canonical version that must
> be followed.
Isn't this the case only if someone else than the author translated
the license?
--
Yaroslav Halchenko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > You need to remove debian/ directory form fslint_2.15.orig.tar.gz file in
> > order to produce non Debian native package!
>
> Could you please point me where it is *required* (to address "need
> to") that upstream sourced do not include debian/?
> I full
On Mon, 2006-05-22 at 22:10 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:32:18PM +0800, Ying-Chun Liu wrote:
> > Second, the javadoc documents coming with the source files are Japanese.
> > Should I prune the documents or include them? How do I include them?
>
> Please, keep them. Rem
Sorry to intrude but I wanted to clarify a bit (although there had been
a lengthy thread on native packages not that long ago)
> You need to remove debian/ directory form fslint_2.15.orig.tar.gz file in
> order to produce non Debian native package!
Could you please point me where it is *required*
13 matches
Mail list logo
