haven't heard from you in a while! ;-)

2005-04-24 Thread Gretchen Jolly
Oh my god dude You'll never guess what happened tonight. Pretty much found an 18-and-over date site that doesn't charge anything. Tons of couples, girls and guys are there messaging and meeting eachother. And I'm sure there is someone (or more than one) for you. Although most of them want one-

Re: RFS: avinfo

2005-04-24 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
Noticed a mistake in one of the links in my last mail. The AVInfo section on shounen.ru is under http://shounen.ru/soft/avinfo/ The source files can be downloaded from http://shounen.ru/soft/avinfo/download.shtml -- With best regards, Stanislav Maslovski -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED

RFS: avinfo

2005-04-24 Thread Stanislav Maslovski
Hello, I have created a debian package of AVInfo (1.0.a15), a very usefull utility that extracts various information from multimedia files, such as MPEG or AVI, and generates detailed (and fully configurable) reports. AVInfo is free software (GNU GPL). I am looking for someone who will help this

Re: need some uploads :))

2005-04-24 Thread Mattia Dongili
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 09:01:23PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote: > On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 08:48:41PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 10:32:31PM +0200, giskard wrote: > > [...] > > > - nvu (www.autistici.org/giskard/file/frankie/) h... #binary mkdir -p /tmp/buildd/nvu-1

Re: dpatch problem

2005-04-24 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Sonntag, den 24.04.2005, 16:25 +0200 schrieb Frederik Himpe: > For my own use, I want to add a patch (impulse trigger profile patch) to > libvorbis. I tried to do this with the dpatch system. When I try to build > my package, this happens: > > $ dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot [..] > dpatch --with

Re: co-maintainer

2005-04-24 Thread Jamin W . Collins
On Apr 24, 2005, at 1:04 PM, Neil Williams wrote: Do I need a sponsor to be a co-maintainer for an existing package? or an advocate? or just ask? Just ask. Since there's already a maintainer they are either already a Debian Developer with an account or they already have a sponsor for their uploa

Re: co-maintainer

2005-04-24 Thread Steve Kemp
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 08:04:00PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > Do I need a sponsor to be a co-maintainer for an existing package? > or an advocate? Just ask if you wish a sponsor to upload a finished package for you. If you wish to share maintainence then asking for a co-maintainer is the

Re: Orfan package crm114

2005-04-24 Thread Nico Golde
Hi, * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-24 21:00]: > I am a newbie on debian-mentors, and I wish maintain the orfaned package > crm114 > in the debian packages. Who want be my sponsor ? Can you send me more > information how to do this job ? See: http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/#ho

co-maintainer

2005-04-24 Thread Neil Williams
Do I need a sponsor to be a co-maintainer for an existing package? or an advocate? or just ask? -- Neil Williams = http://www.dcglug.org.uk/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ pgpW8S49phQcC.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: need some uploads :))

2005-04-24 Thread Mattia Dongili
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 08:48:41PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 10:32:31PM +0200, giskard wrote: > [...] > > - nvu (www.autistici.org/giskard/file/frankie/) uh, and last but not least, from the nvu qa page: ,--- | There were override disparities found in suite uns

Orfan package crm114

2005-04-24 Thread jczucco
Hi everyone. I am a newbie on debian-mentors, and I wish maintain the orfaned package crm114 in the debian packages. Who want be my sponsor ? Can you send me more information how to do this job ? Jeronimo Zucco LPIC-1 Linux Professional Institute Certified Certificado Conectiva Linux

Re: need some uploads :))

2005-04-24 Thread Mattia Dongili
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 10:32:31PM +0200, giskard wrote: [...] > - nvu (www.autistici.org/giskard/file/frankie/) some notes: - be careful with the version you chose: # dpkg --compare-versions 1.0pre '>' 1.0 && echo $? 0 so you could have problems when later packaging 1.0 A known strategy f

Re: Creating libatk1.0-dev package

2005-04-24 Thread David Weinehall
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 04:48:49PM +0200, Khiraly wrote: > Hi! > > I want to work with java-gnome project, and for this reason I need to > install at least libatk 1.9.0 version (the current SID package: 1.8.0-4) How about using the already existing Debian-package? smyslov:~/deb# apt-cache policy

Creating libatk1.0-dev package

2005-04-24 Thread Khiraly
Hi! I want to work with java-gnome project, and for this reason I need to install at least libatk 1.9.0 version (the current SID package: 1.8.0-4) So I have downloaded the source: ftp://ftp.gtk.org/pub/gtk/v2.6/atk-1.9.0.tar.bz2 And unpacked: tar -xjf atk-1.9.0.tar.bz2 mv atk-1.9.0 libatk1.0-0-1

dpatch problem

2005-04-24 Thread Frederik Himpe
For my own use, I want to add a patch (impulse trigger profile patch) to libvorbis. I tried to do this with the dpatch system. When I try to build my package, this happens: $ dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot dpkg-buildpackage: source package is libvorbis dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 1.1.0-2 dp

Re: RFS: sitecopy

2005-04-24 Thread Reed Snellenberger
Florian Ernst wrote: Did you contact upstream about this already? Are there really any plans to bring xsitecopy back? Yes, I have. He says he's done some work on the Gnome 2.x version, but didn't finish it. It's in his "If I ever get time..." queue at the moment. FWIW, he agreed with the not

Re: RFS: sitecopy

2005-04-24 Thread Florian Ernst
Hello *, On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 09:32:14AM -0500, Reed Snellenberger wrote: > 4) After this release goes out, begin working with the upstream to try > and get a new xsitecopy that could be added back to the sitecopy source > package for some subsequent release. Did you contact upstream about

Re: RFS: sitecopy

2005-04-24 Thread Florian Ernst
Hello *, On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 01:01:52AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > On 23 Apr 2005, at 16:32, Reed Snellenberger wrote: > >3) as an interim step, possibly ask ftp-masters to remove the existing > >(semi-broken) xsitecopy-0.11.4-6 package (still undecided about that) > > I don't know really