On Oct 28 2004, Rogério Brito wrote:
> Regarding the postrm, yes, it was missing. I put the postinst and postrm
> calling texhash, but it seems that I may have deleted the postrm, which was
> obviously a fault on my side. I'm doing it again.
I forgot to say that I have uploaded a new version of th
On Oct 27 2004, Frank Küster wrote:
> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> > I can only speak for the TeX part, but it seems quite well.
>
> Quite. But the package is lacking a postrm which should call mktexlsr or
> texhash again.
Ooops. Thank you *very much* for your feedback Frank.
I a
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 02:28:48PM +0300, Eugeniy Meshcheryakov wrote:
| 26.10.2004 ?? 12:07 +0530 Chirag Kantharia ??(-):
| > So, they don't have a .orig.tar.gz which I can use. Though debuild
| So make it. Put patches into tarball. There are many packages for that
| there is no up
On Oct 27 2004, Frank Küster wrote:
> And one other thing I just noticed: As far as I can see, there is no
> tarball on the project website, and you created one containing the Java
> application. But if you create your tarball, please also put the other
> upstream files into it. Together with the m
On Oct 28 2004, Rogério Brito wrote:
> Regarding the postrm, yes, it was missing. I put the postinst and postrm
> calling texhash, but it seems that I may have deleted the postrm, which was
> obviously a fault on my side. I'm doing it again.
I forgot to say that I have uploaded a new version of th
On Oct 27 2004, Frank Küster wrote:
> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> > I can only speak for the TeX part, but it seems quite well.
>
> Quite. But the package is lacking a postrm which should call mktexlsr or
> texhash again.
Ooops. Thank you *very much* for your feedback Frank.
I a
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 02:28:48PM +0300, Eugeniy Meshcheryakov wrote:
| 26.10.2004 ?? 12:07 +0530 Chirag Kantharia ??(-):
| > So, they don't have a .orig.tar.gz which I can use. Though debuild
| So make it. Put patches into tarball. There are many packages for that
| there is no up
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> also sprach Martin Dickopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.27.1954 +0200]:
>> Sorry, but I don't understand what you mean by that. What hotplug
>> abilities could/should a tool which is specifically intended for
>> manual mounting have?
>
> a simple udev
Matt Brubeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Martin Dickopp wrote:
>
>> Both pmount and my package try to solve the same problem -- letting
>> users access removable media. The difference is that pmount allows
>> users to mount and unmount these devices manually, while my script
>> mounts and unmoun
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If a package creates a user when it is installed, should it remove this user
when it is removed, on only when it is purged?
IMHO, when it is purged. At least if it may own the configuration files that
removing the package may leave behind. For the package I have that create
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> also sprach Martin Dickopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.27.1954 +0200]:
>> Sorry, but I don't understand what you mean by that. What hotplug
>> abilities could/should a tool which is specifically intended for
>> manual mounting have?
>
> a simple udev
Matt Brubeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Martin Dickopp wrote:
>
>> Both pmount and my package try to solve the same problem -- letting
>> users access removable media. The difference is that pmount allows
>> users to mount and unmount these devices manually, while my script
>> mounts and unmoun
also sprach Martin Dickopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.27.1954 +0200]:
> Sorry, but I don't understand what you mean by that. What hotplug
> abilities could/should a tool which is specifically intended for
> manual mounting have?
a simple udev or hotplug hook. udev or hotplug (the first preferred
also sprach [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.27.1939 +0200]:
> If a package creates a user when it is installed, should it remove this
> user when it is removed, on only when it is purged?
best during postrm because the user may own files. if you are
certain that the user does not o
Martin Dickopp wrote:
> Both pmount and my package try to solve the same problem -- letting
> users access removable media. The difference is that pmount allows
> users to mount and unmount these devices manually, while my script
> mounts and unmounts them automatically. Another difference is that
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> also sprach Martin Dickopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.27.1842 +0200]:
>> Both pmount and my package try to solve the same problem --
>> letting users access removable media. The difference is that
>> pmount allows users to mount and unmount these dev
If a package creates a user when it is installed, should it remove this
user when it is removed, on only when it is purged?
I couldn't find this topic in either the Policy Manual or Developers
Reference.
I did find some interesting information about packages creating &
removing users, but it
Hello,
sorry, i forget to put the source packages.
And here are the correct address:
apt -> deb http://gsic.tel.uva.es/debian-packages unstable main
web -> http://gsic.tel.uva.es/debian-packages/pool/main/c/cnet
I have to update my apt repository nash script to put the source
packages. Curre
also sprach Martin Dickopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.27.1842 +0200]:
> Both pmount and my package try to solve the same problem --
> letting users access removable media. The difference is that
> pmount allows users to mount and unmount these devices manually,
> while my script mounts and unmoun
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If a package creates a user when it is installed, should it remove this user
when it is removed, on only when it is purged?
IMHO, when it is purged. At least if it may own the configuration files that
removing the package may leave behind. For the package I have that creates a
Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Martin Dickopp [Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:22:22 +0200]:
>> martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> > Anyway, couldn't you possibly create a little tool which would start
>> > a command after remounting the device async, and mount it sync
>> > again
also sprach Martin Dickopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.27.1954 +0200]:
> Sorry, but I don't understand what you mean by that. What hotplug
> abilities could/should a tool which is specifically intended for
> manual mounting have?
a simple udev or hotplug hook. udev or hotplug (the first preferred
also sprach [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.27.1939 +0200]:
> If a package creates a user when it is installed, should it remove this
> user when it is removed, on only when it is purged?
best during postrm because the user may own files. if you are
certain that the user does not o
Why go on with a small p e n ì s? We can help within days!
http://www.boliopple.com/9/4/index.php?ai=7790&com=35&;
wyQmx70TU9RjnRx0YlABut at that moment I glanced round at the crowd that had
followed me.If he hasn't telephoned then, I'll call him. I will.Ok
friend.717686236
Martin Dickopp wrote:
> Both pmount and my package try to solve the same problem -- letting
> users access removable media. The difference is that pmount allows
> users to mount and unmount these devices manually, while my script
> mounts and unmounts them automatically. Another difference is that
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> also sprach Martin Dickopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.27.0022 +0200]:
>> http://www.zero-based.org/debian/packages/usbmount_0.0.2.dsc
>> http://www.zero-based.org/debian/packages/usbmount_0.0.2.tar.gz
>
> Why did you make it a native package?
It
Martin Braure de Calignon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Martin Dickopp a écrit :
>
> |Martin Braure de Calignon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |
> |>Be carreful, I heard that sync has not been implemented with FAT
> |>filesystem. Of course it does
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> also sprach Martin Dickopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.27.1842 +0200]:
>> Both pmount and my package try to solve the same problem --
>> letting users access removable media. The difference is that
>> pmount allows users to mount and unmount these dev
also sprach Sven Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.27.1720 +0200]:
> Why not? He wrote the script on Debian and is packaging it for
> debian (and as far as I understood him, he is not publishing any
> other package of it). I don't mean to say he shouldn't split it
> into orig.tar.gz and diff.gz
If a package creates a user when it is installed, should it remove this
user when it is removed, on only when it is purged?
I couldn't find this topic in either the Policy Manual or Developers
Reference.
I did find some interesting information about packages creating &
removing users, but it d
martin f krafft [u] wrote on 27/10/2004 08:29:
also sprach Martin Dickopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.27.0022 +0200]:
http://www.zero-based.org/debian/packages/usbmount_0.0.2.dsc
http://www.zero-based.org/debian/packages/usbmount_0.0.2.tar.gz
Why did you make it a native package?
Why no
Hi Jose Manuel,
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:47:47 +0200
"J. M. D. Mendinueta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have packaged two versions of cnet versus unstable distribution, so
> i have the ability of upgrade the package (and of course create it
> ;)).
Yeah, but for being distributed by Debian e
Hello,
sorry, i forget to put the source packages.
And here are the correct address:
apt -> deb http://gsic.tel.uva.es/debian-packages unstable main
web -> http://gsic.tel.uva.es/debian-packages/pool/main/c/cnet
I have to update my apt repository nash script to put the source
packages. Current,
on
also sprach Martin Dickopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.27.1842 +0200]:
> Both pmount and my package try to solve the same problem --
> letting users access removable media. The difference is that
> pmount allows users to mount and unmount these devices manually,
> while my script mounts and unmoun
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>
>> I would, therefore, appreciate if other people could look to see if I did
>> everything correctly and what are the points that I could improve on the
>> packaging.
>
> I can only speak for the TeX part, but
Adeodato Simà <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Martin Dickopp [Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:22:22 +0200]:
>> martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> > Anyway, couldn't you possibly create a little tool which would start
>> > a command after remounting the device async, and mount it sync
>> > again
Why go on with a small p e n ì s? We can help within days!
http://www.boliopple.com/9/4/index.php?ai=7790&com=35&;
wyQmx70TU9RjnRx0YlABut at that moment I glanced round at the crowd that had followed
me.If he hasn't telephoned then, I'll call him. I will.Ok friend.717686236
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> also sprach Martin Dickopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.27.0022 +0200]:
>> http://www.zero-based.org/debian/packages/usbmount_0.0.2.dsc
>> http://www.zero-based.org/debian/packages/usbmount_0.0.2.tar.gz
>
> Why did you make it a native package?
It
Martin Braure de Calignon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Martin Dickopp a Ãcrit :
>
> |Martin Braure de Calignon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |
> |>Be carreful, I heard that sync has not been implemented with FAT
> |>filesystem. Of course it does
also sprach Sven Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.27.1720 +0200]:
> Why not? He wrote the script on Debian and is packaging it for
> debian (and as far as I understood him, he is not publishing any
> other package of it). I don't mean to say he shouldn't split it
> into orig.tar.gz and diff.gz
Hello,
my name is Jose Manuel Delgado Mendinueta, Telecomunnications student
at the University of Valladolid, Spain.
I'm working in colaboration with Telematic Engineering Department, and
we use the cnet network simulator program in our lessons, for students
to practise
the theoretical concept
martin f krafft [u] wrote on 27/10/2004 08:29:
also sprach Martin Dickopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.27.0022 +0200]:
http://www.zero-based.org/debian/packages/usbmount_0.0.2.dsc
http://www.zero-based.org/debian/packages/usbmount_0.0.2.tar.gz
Why did you make it a native package?
Why not? He wro
Hi Jose Manuel,
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:47:47 +0200
"J. M. D. Mendinueta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have packaged two versions of cnet versus unstable distribution, so
> i have the ability of upgrade the package (and of course create it
> ;)).
Yeah, but for being distributed by Debian e
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>
>> I would, therefore, appreciate if other people could look to see if I did
>> everything correctly and what are the points that I could improve on the
>> packaging.
>
> I can only speak for the TeX part, but
Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> I would, therefore, appreciate if other people could look to see if I did
> everything correctly and what are the points that I could improve on the
> packaging.
I can only speak for the TeX part, but it seems quite well. A major
drawback, however, is
Dear Developers,
Since I learned that Debian had Free Java Virtual Machines in testing, I
was keen to just drop the non-free JVM from blackdown.
The only program that uses Java that I use regularly is PPower4, a
post-processor for generating presentations with (La)TeX.
Since PPower4 has both par
Hello,
my name is Jose Manuel Delgado Mendinueta, Telecomunnications student
at the University of Valladolid, Spain.
I'm working in colaboration with Telematic Engineering Department, and
we use the cnet network simulator program in our lessons, for students
to practise
the theoretical concepts.
* Martin Dickopp [Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:22:22 +0200]:
> martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Anyway, couldn't you possibly create a little tool which would start
> > a command after remounting the device async, and mount it sync
> > again once the command stopped? Then I could say somethi
26.10.2004 о 12:07 +0530 Chirag Kantharia написав(-ла):
> So, they don't have a .orig.tar.gz which I can use. Though debuild
So make it. Put patches into tarball. There are many packages for that
there is no upstream tarballs (mozilla* locales for example, other
kernel patches probably too).
--
E
Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> I would, therefore, appreciate if other people could look to see if I did
> everything correctly and what are the points that I could improve on the
> packaging.
I can only speak for the TeX part, but it seems quite well. A major
drawback, however, is
Dear Developers,
Since I learned that Debian had Free Java Virtual Machines in testing, I
was keen to just drop the non-free JVM from blackdown.
The only program that uses Java that I use regularly is PPower4, a
post-processor for generating presentations with (La)TeX.
Since PPower4 has both par
* Martin Dickopp [Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:22:22 +0200]:
> martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Anyway, couldn't you possibly create a little tool which would start
> > a command after remounting the device async, and mount it sync
> > again once the command stopped? Then I could say somethi
26.10.2004 Ð 12:07 +0530 Chirag Kantharia ÑÐÐ(-ÐÐ):
> So, they don't have a .orig.tar.gz which I can use. Though debuild
So make it. Put patches into tarball. There are many packages for that
there is no upstream tarballs (mozilla* locales for example, other
kernel patches probably too).
--
E
Matt Flax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> I am packaging a software which uses "ivmkmf" to generate the makefile.
>
> I am trying to use the rules file to auto gen this makefile, but the
> dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot command fails, 'cause it tries to clean the
> software even before the
Matt Flax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> I am packaging a software which uses "ivmkmf" to generate the makefile.
>
> I am trying to use the rules file to auto gen this makefile, but the
> dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot command fails, 'cause it tries to clean the
> software even before the
also sprach Martin Dickopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.27.0022 +0200]:
> http://www.zero-based.org/debian/packages/usbmount_0.0.2.dsc
> http://www.zero-based.org/debian/packages/usbmount_0.0.2.tar.gz
Why did you make it a native package?
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read
56 matches
Mail list logo
