GET your U N IVE RSI T Y D I PL0M A
Do you want a prosperous future, increased
earning powermore money and the respect of all?
Cal1 this number: 206 -424- 1596 (anytime)
There are no required tests, class e s, books, or
interviews!
Get a B a chelors, Masters, M BA, and D o ctorate
(
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I would like to make another request for a sponsor of my libezgtk-ruby
package. I have gotten my gpg key signed by a DD and have been
maintaining the unrelated PennMUSH package, which is also looking for a
sponsor, over the last 9 months. So, I'm not en
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello again,
I'd like to make a request for a sponsor for my PennMUSH packages. I've
received some very helpful input from a few members of the community,
but haven't had a potential sponsor for a few months now. I've
continued to keep the package up to
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 12:59:56AM +0200, Erik Schanze wrote:
> > As John mentioned, it was him who did the assignation to the QA team, as
> > is proper procedure when orphaning.
> >
> Aha, I was puzzled about:
Erik,
I think we all do appreciate your enthusiasm here. I think it is great
that you
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 12:59:56AM +0200, Erik Schanze wrote:
> > As John mentioned, it was him who did the assignation to the QA team, as
> > is proper procedure when orphaning.
> >
> Aha, I was puzzled about:
Erik,
I think we all do appreciate your enthusiasm here. I think it is great
that you
Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> la, 2004-08-07 kello 00:09, Erik Schanze kirjoitti:
...
> depending on work pressures). It would probably be best to wait for a
> while before a new version is uploaded, to avoid putting unnecessary
> pressure on the buildds right now, they seem to be o
Hello Erik,
* Erik Schanze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-07 01:38]:
> I have noticed that QA-team adopt the gif2png package.
> I'd like to veto here.
>
> I have filed an ITA on gif2png:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=261583
>
> I have package a new version and request an RFS 3
Hello Christoffer,
* Christoffer Sawicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-07 01:38]:
> I'm packaging GTK-Qt Theme Engine [0] and have a question about the naming of
> the binary package. The name is currently gtk2-engines-gtk-qt which is sort
> of right since the package contains a GTK2 theme engine
Hello folks,
I'm hoping to adopt this orphaned package since I use it regularly on all
of my desktop systems. This is the first package that I've looked for a
sponsor for, so any advice or criticism on how the packaging was done
would be greatly appreciated.
You can retrieve the package from:
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sh doesn't even have a libc6 in the archive. I always ignore both of
> these.
So will I, thanks for all answers.
Christoph
Hello Lars!
Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> la, 2004-08-07 kello 00:09, Erik Schanze kirjoitti:
> > I have noticed that QA-team adopt the gif2png package.
> > I'd like to veto here.
>
> As John mentioned, it was him who did the assignation to the QA team, as
> is proper procedure when orpha
Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> la, 2004-08-07 kello 00:09, Erik Schanze kirjoitti:
...
> depending on work pressures). It would probably be best to wait for a
> while before a new version is uploaded, to avoid putting unnecessary
> pressure on the buildds right now, they seem to be o
la, 2004-08-07 kello 00:09, Erik Schanze kirjoitti:
> I have noticed that QA-team adopt the gif2png package.
> I'd like to veto here.
As John mentioned, it was him who did the assignation to the QA team, as
is proper procedure when orphaning.
What was not proper procedure was that I didn't re-tit
I'm packaging GTK-Qt Theme Engine [0] and have a question about the naming of
the binary package. The name is currently gtk2-engines-gtk-qt which is sort
of right since the package contains a GTK2 theme engine. However, it's not a
standard theme engine since it depends on Qt for its drawing and
Hello Erik,
* Erik Schanze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-07 01:38]:
> I have noticed that QA-team adopt the gif2png package.
> I'd like to veto here.
>
> I have filed an ITA on gif2png:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=261583
>
> I have package a new version and request an RFS 3
Hello Christoffer,
* Christoffer Sawicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-07 01:38]:
> I'm packaging GTK-Qt Theme Engine [0] and have a question about the naming of
> the binary package. The name is currently gtk2-engines-gtk-qt which is sort
> of right since the package contains a GTK2 theme engine
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 11:09:16PM +0200, Erik Schanze wrote:
> I have noticed that QA-team adopt the gif2png package.
> I'd like to veto here.
They did no such thing. As the previous maintainer, I set the
maintainer to Debian QA, which is the *right and proper thing to do*
until the new person a
Hello folks,
I'm hoping to adopt this orphaned package since I use it regularly on all
of my desktop systems. This is the first package that I've looked for a
sponsor for, so any advice or criticism on how the packaging was done
would be greatly appreciated.
You can retrieve the package from:
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sh doesn't even have a libc6 in the archive. I always ignore both of
> these.
So will I, thanks for all answers.
Christoph
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
I have noticed that QA-team adopt the gif2png package.
I'd like to veto here.
I have filed an ITA on gif2png:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=261583
I have package a new version and request an RFS 3 times:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2004/07/msg00416.html
http://l
Hello Lars!
Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> la, 2004-08-07 kello 00:09, Erik Schanze kirjoitti:
> > I have noticed that QA-team adopt the gif2png package.
> > I'd like to veto here.
>
> As John mentioned, it was him who did the assignation to the QA team, as
> is proper procedure when orpha
Hi !
Now I Need someone to upload to debian the package I put here :
For APT :
deb http://debian.i-connexion.net test qmail-scanner
deb-src http://debian.i-connexion.net test qmail-scanner
Thanks
--
Pascal Greliche
Service Technique ICX France
Tel : 08 99 703 403
Fax : 08 26 800 206
Le 23 jui
la, 2004-08-07 kello 00:09, Erik Schanze kirjoitti:
> I have noticed that QA-team adopt the gif2png package.
> I'd like to veto here.
As John mentioned, it was him who did the assignation to the QA team, as
is proper procedure when orphaning.
What was not proper procedure was that I didn't re-tit
I'm packaging GTK-Qt Theme Engine [0] and have a question about the naming of
the binary package. The name is currently gtk2-engines-gtk-qt which is sort
of right since the package contains a GTK2 theme engine. However, it's not a
standard theme engine since it depends on Qt for its drawing and
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 11:09:16PM +0200, Erik Schanze wrote:
> I have noticed that QA-team adopt the gif2png package.
> I'd like to veto here.
They did no such thing. As the previous maintainer, I set the
maintainer to Debian QA, which is the *right and proper thing to do*
until the new person a
Hi!
I have noticed that QA-team adopt the gif2png package.
I'd like to veto here.
I have filed an ITA on gif2png:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=261583
I have package a new version and request an RFS 3 times:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2004/07/msg00416.html
http://l
On 2004-08-06 Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I contributed a very small amount to the subversion package. What I see
> from packages.qa.debian.org is that building it on alpha and other archs
> are failed as the newest apache2 cause trouble with the dependencies.
> The probl
* Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Source: wmapm
> Section: x11
> Priority: extra
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>=3D 4), xlibs-dev, libapm-dev
Afaik you shouldn't use xlibs-dev anymore, see the package's
description. You'll have to examine which of the various X library
packages are really n
Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I contributed a very small amount to the subversion package. What I see
> from packages.qa.debian.org is that building it on alpha and other archs
> are failed as the newest apache2 cause trouble with the dependencies.
> The problem i
Hi !
Now I Need someone to upload to debian the package I put here :
For APT :
deb http://debian.i-connexion.net test qmail-scanner
deb-src http://debian.i-connexion.net test qmail-scanner
Thanks
--
Pascal Greliche
Service Technique ICX France
Tel : 08 99 703 403
Fax : 08 26 800 206
Le 23 juil. 04,
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 07:29:02PM +0200, Alexander List wrote:
>> On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> > The autobuilders will not build nonfree packages no matter what you
>> > try. - You can build manually on one of Debian's machines if you ar
Hi, i adopted the wmapm package and i search a sponsor for it:
Source: wmapm
Section: x11
Priority: extra
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4), xlibs-dev, libapm-dev
Maintainer: Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package: wmapm
Architecture: any
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
Suggests: wmaker
Description: an
Hi,
I contributed a very small amount to the subversion package. What I see
from packages.qa.debian.org is that building it on alpha and other archs
are failed as the newest apache2 cause trouble with the dependencies.
The problem is that apache2 has an arch=all part, and arch=any ones as
well; t
* elijah wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-05 22:19:07 -0500]:
> is there any chance that the software could be ported to compile with one
> of the free pascal compilers? several of those seem quite featureful on
> debian.
No, it uses Kylix components as well, not present in free tools
ofcours
Hello,
I am looking for a sponsor to get my 'cdirip' package into Debian. Here
is the relevant information.
URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cdirip/
Package: cdirip
Version: 0.6.3-2
Priority: optional
Section: otherosfs
Maintainer: Lawrence Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Depends
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 07:19:58PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Christoph Wegscheider wrote:
> | I have one sponsored package in the archive (rsnapshot) and
> | http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> | shows me under Uninstallable->unstable->hurd-i386 sh.
> |
> | * What does uninstallable means here
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 08:42:50AM -0700, Josh Lauricha wrote:
> On Thu 08/05/04 17:35, Brian Sutherland wrote:
> > Make sure that if the package is uninstalled, the cron job is
> > disabled?
>
> I'd do something like:
> # a bunch of lines for setting the command-line options or sourceing
> # /etc
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 07:29:02PM +0200, Alexander List wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > The autobuilders will not build nonfree packages no matter what you
> > try. - You can build manually on one of Debian's machines if you are
> > a DD.
>
> OK, how do I cope with missing
On 2004-08-06 Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I contributed a very small amount to the subversion package. What I see
> from packages.qa.debian.org is that building it on alpha and other archs
> are failed as the newest apache2 cause trouble with the dependencies.
> The probl
On Птн, 2004-08-06 at 12:34 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> >Something strange happens to my internet connection last days,
> >maybe it'll take a little while before I upload the new package.
> Should I look on the current package or wait for an update ?
I don't remember that I changed anything o
* Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Source: wmapm
> Section: x11
> Priority: extra
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>=3D 4), xlibs-dev, libapm-dev
Afaik you shouldn't use xlibs-dev anymore, see the package's
description. You'll have to examine which of the various X library
packages are really n
Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I contributed a very small amount to the subversion package. What I see
> from packages.qa.debian.org is that building it on alpha and other archs
> are failed as the newest apache2 cause trouble with the dependencies.
> The problem i
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 07:29:02PM +0200, Alexander List wrote:
>> On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> > The autobuilders will not build nonfree packages no matter what you
>> > try. - You can build manually on one of Debian's machines if you ar
Hi, i adopted the wmapm package and i search a sponsor for it:
Source: wmapm
Section: x11
Priority: extra
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4), xlibs-dev, libapm-dev
Maintainer: Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package: wmapm
Architecture: any
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
Suggests: wmaker
Description: an
Hi,
I contributed a very small amount to the subversion package. What I see
from packages.qa.debian.org is that building it on alpha and other archs
are failed as the newest apache2 cause trouble with the dependencies.
The problem is that apache2 has an arch=all part, and arch=any ones as
well; t
* elijah wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-05 22:19:07 -0500]:
> is there any chance that the software could be ported to compile with one
> of the free pascal compilers? several of those seem quite featureful on
> debian.
No, it uses Kylix components as well, not present in free tools
ofcours
Hello,
I am looking for a sponsor to get my 'cdirip' package into Debian. Here
is the relevant information.
URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cdirip/
Package: cdirip
Version: 0.6.3-2
Priority: optional
Section: otherosfs
Maintainer: Lawrence Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Depends: l
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 07:19:58PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Christoph Wegscheider wrote:
> | I have one sponsored package in the archive (rsnapshot) and
> | http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> | shows me under Uninstallable->unstable->hurd-i386 sh.
> |
> | * What does uninstallable means here
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 08:42:50AM -0700, Josh Lauricha wrote:
> On Thu 08/05/04 17:35, Brian Sutherland wrote:
> > Make sure that if the package is uninstalled, the cron job is
> > disabled?
>
> I'd do something like:
> # a bunch of lines for setting the command-line options or sourceing
> # /etc
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 07:29:02PM +0200, Alexander List wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > The autobuilders will not build nonfree packages no matter what you
> > try. - You can build manually on one of Debian's machines if you are
> > a DD.
>
> OK, how do I cope with missing
On ÐÑÐ, 2004-08-06 at 12:34 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> >Something strange happens to my internet connection last days,
> >maybe it'll take a little while before I upload the new package.
> Should I look on the current package or wait for an update ?
I don't remember that I changed anything o
Hi all,
I'm looking for a sponsor for libmqueue, POSIX message queues userspace
library (see also [1] for a little discussion about the package).
The package is ready at [2]. It is lintian/linda clean and builds
correctly in a sid chroot (pbuilder).
Is anybody interested?
[1]: http://bugs.debian
Hi all,
I'm looking for a sponsor for libmqueue, POSIX message queues userspace
library (see also [1] for a little discussion about the package).
The package is ready at [2]. It is lintian/linda clean and builds
correctly in a sid chroot (pbuilder).
Is anybody interested?
[1]: http://bugs.debian
Le vendredi 06 août 2004 à 14:27 +0400, Dan Korostelev a écrit :
> I fixed that at least at my local package. I'm not sure if I uploaded
> the fixed one to m.d.n. Something strange happens to my internet
> connection last days, maybe it'll take a little while before I upload
> the new package. Sor
On Птн, 2004-08-06 at 12:13 +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> > This is a small GNOME panl applet to control Rhythmbox music playback.
> Should be panel -->
I fixed that at least at my local package. I'm not sure if I uploaded
the fixed one to m.d.n. Something strange happens to my internet
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 07:09:23PM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
> On ??, 2004-07-29 at 23:48 +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
> > I made a package for rhythmbox-applet (look on mentors.debian.net) and
> > now looking for a sponsor. Please, check it out and upload to Debian if
> > you want. Any sugg
Le jeudi 29 juillet 2004 à 23:48 +0400, Dan Korostelev a écrit :
> I made a package for rhythmbox-applet (look on mentors.debian.net) and
> now looking for a sponsor. Please, check it out and upload to Debian if
> you want. Any suggestions accepted :)
Hi,
Apparently nobody else in interested to s
Le vendredi 06 août 2004 à 14:27 +0400, Dan Korostelev a écrit :
> I fixed that at least at my local package. I'm not sure if I uploaded
> the fixed one to m.d.n. Something strange happens to my internet
> connection last days, maybe it'll take a little while before I upload
> the new package. Sor
On ÐÑÐ, 2004-08-06 at 12:13 +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> > This is a small GNOME panl applet to control Rhythmbox music playback.
> Should be panel -->
I fixed that at least at my local package. I'm not sure if I uploaded
the fixed one to m.d.n. Something strange happens to my internet
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 07:09:23PM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
> On ??, 2004-07-29 at 23:48 +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
> > I made a package for rhythmbox-applet (look on mentors.debian.net) and
> > now looking for a sponsor. Please, check it out and upload to Debian if
> > you want. Any sugg
Le jeudi 29 juillet 2004 à 23:48 +0400, Dan Korostelev a écrit :
> I made a package for rhythmbox-applet (look on mentors.debian.net) and
> now looking for a sponsor. Please, check it out and upload to Debian if
> you want. Any suggestions accepted :)
Hi,
Apparently nobody else in interested to s
61 matches
Mail list logo
