On 2004-08-06 Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I contributed a very small amount to the subversion package. What I see > from packages.qa.debian.org is that building it on alpha and other archs > are failed as the newest apache2 cause trouble with the dependencies. > The problem is that apache2 has an arch=all part, and arch=any ones as > well; the arch=all part installed for the subversion dependency, but the > arch=any parts are not available. Looking into apache2 build logs, I see > on alpha and other archs it is not even tried to build. How that can > happen if apache2 uploaded a day earlier than subversion, however > apache2 is not even tried to build, but subversion is tried?
Check http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph-week.png to see *how* overloaded our buildds currently are. See http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/07/msg01555.html for how builds are ordered, especially note the facts that dependoncies are not evaluated before scheduling a build. > If I would be a Debian Developer, what I could do to resolve such > situations (I mean for example to force the apache2 build)? You'd either wait or try to find somebody with a alpha nachine and ask him to build it manually. Because two days to early to pester [EMAIL PROTECTED] and because the are ridiculously overloaded currently. cu andreas -- "See, I told you they'd listen to Reason," [SPOILER] Svfurlr fnlf, fuhggvat qbja gur juveyvat tha. Neal Stephenson in "Snow Crash" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
