Hi! I have noticed that QA-team adopt the gif2png package. I'd like to veto here.
I have filed an ITA on gif2png: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=261583 I have package a new version and request an RFS 3 times: http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2004/07/msg00416.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2004/08/msg00048.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-german/2004/08/msg00011.html A ready package, that solve this bug is already available. Why did QA-group adopt this package instead to sponsor my upload? This means unnecessary work for me to build a new package and double work on package at all! Are there no more important things to do for QA-team? The same was happen on my first package txt2pdbdoc and this sucks. Or should I post any RFS on QA-list that QA-team get known my work? What are next steps? Could QA-team revert their package and sponsor my one or have I build a new one? Regards, Erik -- www.ErikSchanze.de ********************************************* Bitte keine HTML-Mails! No HTML mails, please! Maillimit: 1 MB * * Linux-Info-Tag in Dresden, am 30. Oktober 2004 * Info: http://www.linux-info-tag.de *
pgpZ4WsaqCK9V.pgp
Description: signature
