On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:30:59PM +0200, Peter Rockai (mornfall) wrote:
>Anyway, does this mean you are willing to upload the package for me?
I'm not a DD, so I can't.
Regards,
Anibal Monsalve Salazar
--
.''`. Debian GNU/Linux | Building 28C
: :' : Free Operating System | Monash Univers
Dan Korostelev wrote, On 06/28/2004 06:17 PM:
I'm again about GNOME PPP. Please, someone who knows, look at
www.gnome-ppp.org and tell me if it's possible to write a debian watch
file for it. I guess no, but maybe.
It is...
K.
--
Lucas Wall <[EMAIL PROT
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:53:11AM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
> Then who can be reached? I have sent a mail to that address back then, no
> answer yet.
Sorry for the delay. I still didn't find time to reply to the ticket.
Shame on me. :)
We are currently investigating. But our disks h
I'm again about GNOME PPP. Please, someone who knows, look at
www.gnome-ppp.org and tell me if it's possible to write a debian watch
file for it. I guess no, but maybe.
--
Dan Korostelev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dan Korostelev wrote, On 06/28/2004 06:17 PM:
I'm again about GNOME PPP. Please, someone who knows, look at
www.gnome-ppp.org and tell me if it's possible to write a debian watch
file for it. I guess no, but maybe.
It is...
K.
--
Lucas Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bu
Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-28 22:21:14 +1000]:
>
>> I don't think you should create a debian package for small script, IMO.
> Agree. Even if I don't know where it should go, but definiately finding
> a backage whic
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:53:11AM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
> Then who can be reached? I have sent a mail to that address back then, no
> answer yet.
Sorry for the delay. I still didn't find time to reply to the ticket.
Shame on me. :)
We are currently investigating. But our disks h
I'm again about GNOME PPP. Please, someone who knows, look at
www.gnome-ppp.org and tell me if it's possible to write a debian watch
file for it. I guess no, but maybe.
--
Dan Korostelev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Greetings,
i am still looking a sponsor for package "yaffa".
Version 0.11 is a new upstream release.
<><>Package name : yaffa
<><><>Version: 0.10-1
Upstream Authors : Anton Persson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<>URL: http://moyaffa.sourceforge.net
<>
Licence
Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-28 22:21:14 +1000]:
>
>> I don't think you should create a debian package for small script, IMO.
> Agree. Even if I don't know where it should go, but definiately finding
> a backage whic
* Dan Korostelev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-28 20:39:41 +0400]:
> Is there an easy and automated way to create a mozilla locale package?
> Looks like they're all similar. Debian lacks russian mozilla locale
> package.
See my mozilla-locale-hu package, will be available from the pool, after
the
Greetings,
i am still looking a sponsor for package "yaffa".
Version 0.11 is a new upstream release.
<><>Package name : yaffa
<><><>Version: 0.10-1
Upstream Authors : Anton Persson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<>URL: http://moyaffa.sourceforge.net
<>
Licence:
On Пнд, 2004-06-28 at 18:41 +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
> >This manual page documents briefly the
> gnome-ppp command.
> Superfluous.
Removed.
> > This manual page was written for the Debian
> > distribution because the original program
> > does not have a m
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 07:05:54PM +0200, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
> I'm in the process of adopting the package 'motion' (Bug#254336). I'm
> currently reviewing the package files and updating them accordingly to
> reflect new maintainership, plus various small fixes.
>
> Regarding the debian/co
* Frederik Dannemare [Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:05:54 +0200]:
> Hi,
> I'm in the process of adopting the package 'motion' (Bug#254336). I'm
> currently reviewing the package files and updating them accordingly to
> reflect new maintainership, plus various small fixes.
> Regarding the debian/copyright
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm in the process of adopting the package 'motion' (Bug#254336). I'm
currently reviewing the package files and updating them accordingly to
reflect new maintainership, plus various small fixes.
Regarding the debian/copyright: Should I leave th
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 09:35, Dan Korostelev wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 09:17 +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
>
> > Here's an improved version of the manpage. It still needs some work.
> GNOME PPP is not only a accound configurer like wvdialconf. It is a
> graphical frontend, a graphical dialer. I
Is there an easy and automated way to create a mozilla locale package?
Looks like they're all similar. Debian lacks russian mozilla locale
package.
--
Dan Korostelev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Пнд, 2004-06-28 at 17:57 +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
> Goedson does not want to package, _only sponsor_ it.
He also said to me that he'll check the package tonight and upload it to
Debian if all will be okay.
--
Dan Korostelev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[Second attempt for seeking a sponsor]
Hi!
I've uploaded netdump package to mentors.debian.net and am seeking for
a sponsor for this package.
The netdump client sets up the kernel to send crash dumps and/or
console messages as syslog packets to a remote system.
The netdump server listens to the
On Пнд, 2004-06-28 at 17:48 +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
> Delete them after 'make install' from debian/rules . You may tamper
> with the Makefile as well, but be it as a last resort, only if the 'make
> install' create big files/files after a long calculation etc, you got
> the idea.
O
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 07:41:27PM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
> Is it possible to make some files installed by 'make install' excluded
> from deb package???
Sure.
rm debian/package/blah/fasel
in debian/rules after make install.
cu andreas
"Peter Rockai (mornfall)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
>
>> W: amarok source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.5.8.0
>> W: amarok source: changelog-should-mention-nmu
>> W: amarok source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 1.0.0-3
>> W: amarok source: source-con
* Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-28 13:30:28 +1000]:
> BTW, why http://bugs.debian.org/251472 has Goedson Teixeira Paixao
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> as owner of the ITP?
Goedson made a mistake, he wants to sponsor the upload, but he wrongly
put himself as the owner. But Dan is th
Hi Colin, Rene,
* Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-28 10:29:32 +0200]:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:15:58AM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
> > > Anyway I think as perl is not build-essential, itself should show up in
> > > Build-Depends even.
> >
> > /u
* Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-28 22:21:14 +1000]:
> I don't think you should create a debian package for small script, IMO.
Agree. Even if I don't know where it should go, but definiately finding
a backage which would include ketchup sounds a better idea.
> >>I would lik
* Dan Korostelev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-28 19:41:27 +0400]:
> Is it possible to make some files installed by 'make install' excluded
> from deb package???
Delete them after 'make install' from debian/rules . You may tamper
with the Makefile as well, but be it as a last resort, only if the '
* Dan Korostelev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-28 20:39:41 +0400]:
> Is there an easy and automated way to create a mozilla locale package?
> Looks like they're all similar. Debian lacks russian mozilla locale
> package.
See my mozilla-locale-hu package, will be available from the pool, after
the
Is it possible to make some files installed by 'make install' excluded
from deb package???
--
Dan Korostelev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On ÐÐÐ, 2004-06-28 at 18:41 +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
> >This manual page documents briefly the
> gnome-ppp command.
> Superfluous.
Removed.
> > This manual page was written for the Debian
> > distribution because the original program
> > does not have a m
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 07:05:54PM +0200, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
> I'm in the process of adopting the package 'motion' (Bug#254336). I'm
> currently reviewing the package files and updating them accordingly to
> reflect new maintainership, plus various small fixes.
>
> Regarding the debian/co
* Frederik Dannemare [Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:05:54 +0200]:
> Hi,
> I'm in the process of adopting the package 'motion' (Bug#254336). I'm
> currently reviewing the package files and updating them accordingly to
> reflect new maintainership, plus various small fixes.
> Regarding the debian/copyright
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm in the process of adopting the package 'motion' (Bug#254336). I'm
currently reviewing the package files and updating them accordingly to
reflect new maintainership, plus various small fixes.
Regarding the debian/copyright: Should I leave th
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 02:11:31PM +0200, Arnaud FLORENT wrote:
>
HTML in e-mail messages, especially those to Debian lists, is deeply frowned
upon. Turn it off, and if you can't, switch to a mail program which will
allow you to.
- Matt
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 09:35, Dan Korostelev wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 09:17 +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
>
> > Here's an improved version of the manpage. It still needs some work.
> GNOME PPP is not only a accound configurer like wvdialconf. It is a
> graphical frontend, a graphical dialer. I
Is there an easy and automated way to create a mozilla locale package?
Looks like they're all similar. Debian lacks russian mozilla locale
package.
--
Dan Korostelev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE
On ÐÐÐ, 2004-06-28 at 17:57 +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
> Goedson does not want to package, _only sponsor_ it.
He also said to me that he'll check the package tonight and upload it to
Debian if all will be okay.
--
Dan Korostelev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
[Second attempt for seeking a sponsor]
Hi!
I've uploaded netdump package to mentors.debian.net and am seeking for
a sponsor for this package.
The netdump client sets up the kernel to send crash dumps and/or
console messages as syslog packets to a remote system.
The netdump server listens to the
On ÐÐÐ, 2004-06-28 at 17:48 +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
> Delete them after 'make install' from debian/rules . You may tamper
> with the Makefile as well, but be it as a last resort, only if the 'make
> install' create big files/files after a long calculation etc, you got
> the idea.
O
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 07:41:27PM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
> Is it possible to make some files installed by 'make install' excluded
> from deb package???
Sure.
rm debian/package/blah/fasel
in debian/rules after make install.
cu andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
"Peter Rockai (mornfall)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
>
>> W: amarok source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.5.8.0
>> W: amarok source: changelog-should-mention-nmu
>> W: amarok source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 1.0.0-3
>> W: amarok source: source-con
* Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-28 13:30:28 +1000]:
> BTW, why http://bugs.debian.org/251472 has Goedson Teixeira Paixao
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> as owner of the ITP?
Goedson made a mistake, he wants to sponsor the upload, but he wrongly
put himself as the owner. But Dan is th
Hi Colin, Rene,
* Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-28 10:29:32 +0200]:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:15:58AM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
> > > Anyway I think as perl is not build-essential, itself should show up in
> > > Build-Depends even.
> >
> > /u
* Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-28 22:21:14 +1000]:
> I don't think you should create a debian package for small script, IMO.
Agree. Even if I don't know where it should go, but definiately finding
a backage which would include ketchup sounds a better idea.
> >>I would lik
* Dan Korostelev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-28 19:41:27 +0400]:
> Is it possible to make some files installed by 'make install' excluded
> from deb package???
Delete them after 'make install' from debian/rules . You may tamper
with the Makefile as well, but be it as a last resort, only if the '
Is it possible to make some files installed by 'make install' excluded
from deb package???
--
Dan Korostelev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 02:11:31PM +0200, Arnaud FLORENT wrote:
>
HTML in e-mail messages, especially those to Debian lists, is deeply frowned
upon. Turn it off, and if you can't, switch to a mail program which will
allow you to.
- Matt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 02:03:52PM +0200, Pierre HABOUZIT wrote:
>>>
>>>Linda:
>>>
>>>E: amarok: binary-without-manpage amarok
>>>E: amarok: binary-without-manpage amarokapp
>>>E: amarok; Uses cdbs and debhelper.mk, but the version is too old.
>>Hmm, what should i do here? Tighten up the version on
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 08:41:22AM +0100, Jack Wasey wrote:
>Thanks for looking, Anibal.
>
>Please see:
>http://www.jackwasey.co.uk/debian
I don't think you should create a debian package for small script, IMO.
>I've added the requested files and an index page. N.b. I do not have a diff.gz
>file
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 20:09 +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> You didn't put your name, your email address and web site (from where the
> original package was downloaded) in the copyright file.
Oh, okay, fixed. We'll be included in next package release.
Any other flaws? ;)
--
Dan Korostel
Thanks
i'va found a solution
i made link from files dirs postinst ... to package1.dirs
package1.postinst package2.dirs package2.postinst
that works but i thought there would exist a better solution.
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo a écrit :
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 11:11:41AM +0200, Arnaud FLOR
> >
> > Linda:
> >
> > E: amarok: binary-without-manpage amarok
> > E: amarok: binary-without-manpage amarokapp
> > E: amarok; Uses cdbs and debhelper.mk, but the version is too old.
> Hmm, what should i do here? Tighten up the version on cdbs build-dep?
I had the same on a package oif mine. you
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 11:11:41AM +0200, Arnaud FLORENT wrote:
> Hi
Hello.
> i want to build 2 packages that install two different versions of the
> same program.
>
> everything is shared between the 2 packages except the binary files.
>
> i try to use the dh_make in multiple binary mode, but
Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 01:23:52PM +0200, Peter Rockai (mornfall) wrote:
>>Hello!
>>
>>I'm looking for sponsor for the $SUBJ, until i finish my NM application.
>>The package is available at:
>>deb http://www.kalyxo.org/debian unstable main
>
> I run pbuilder on th
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 12:28 +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> why i receive this mails two time?
CC? (This mail you should recieve only once)
--
Dan Korostelev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 01:23:52PM +0200, Peter Rockai (mornfall) wrote:
>Hello!
>
>I'm looking for sponsor for the $SUBJ, until i finish my NM application. The
>package is available at:
>deb http://www.kalyxo.org/debian unstable main
I run pbuilder on the source debian package. The output is at
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 02:03:52PM +0200, Pierre HABOUZIT wrote:
>>>
>>>Linda:
>>>
>>>E: amarok: binary-without-manpage amarok
>>>E: amarok: binary-without-manpage amarokapp
>>>E: amarok; Uses cdbs and debhelper.mk, but the version is too old.
>>Hmm, what should i do here? Tighten up the version on
Hello Dan,
why i receive this mails two time?
regards nico
--
Nico Golde - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.ngolde.de
GPG: FF46 E565 5CC1 E2E5 3F69 C739 1D87 E549 7364 7CFF
Is there life after /sbin/halt -p?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 08:41:22AM +0100, Jack Wasey wrote:
>Thanks for looking, Anibal.
>
>Please see:
>http://www.jackwasey.co.uk/debian
I don't think you should create a debian package for small script, IMO.
>I've added the requested files and an index page. N.b. I do not have a diff.gz
>file
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:50:46PM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
>Okay, new (-4) package uploaded with new manpage and copyright file.
You didn't put your name, your email address and web site (from where the
original package was downloaded) in the copyright file.
>--
>Dan Korostelev <[EMAIL PROT
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 20:09 +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> You didn't put your name, your email address and web site (from where the
> original package was downloaded) in the copyright file.
Oh, okay, fixed. We'll be included in next package release.
Any other flaws? ;)
--
Dan Korostel
Thanks
i'va found a solution
i made link from files dirs postinst ... to package1.dirs
package1.postinst package2.dirs package2.postinst
that works but i thought there would exist a better solution.
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo a écrit :
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 11:11:41AM +0200, Arnaud FLOR
> >
> > Linda:
> >
> > E: amarok: binary-without-manpage amarok
> > E: amarok: binary-without-manpage amarokapp
> > E: amarok; Uses cdbs and debhelper.mk, but the version is too old.
> Hmm, what should i do here? Tighten up the version on cdbs build-dep?
I had the same on a package oif mine. you
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 11:11:41AM +0200, Arnaud FLORENT wrote:
> Hi
Hello.
> i want to build 2 packages that install two different versions of the
> same program.
>
> everything is shared between the 2 packages except the binary files.
>
> i try to use the dh_make in multiple binary mode, but
Okay, new (-4) package uploaded with new manpage and copyright file.
--
Dan Korostelev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 01:23:52PM +0200, Peter Rockai (mornfall) wrote:
>>Hello!
>>
>>I'm looking for sponsor for the $SUBJ, until i finish my NM application.
>>The package is available at:
>>deb http://www.kalyxo.org/debian unstable main
>
> I run pbuilder on th
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 12:28 +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> why i receive this mails two time?
CC? (This mail you should recieve only once)
--
Dan Korostelev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 10:01:50AM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
>On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 13:30 +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
>>Your debian/copyright file is broken. Please read [0] and [1] and change
>>your debian/copyright file accordingly.
>
>Somehow fixed, please check the revision 3 of th
Hi
i want to build 2 packages that install two different versions of the
same program.
everything is shared between the 2 packages except the binary files.
i try to use the dh_make in multiple binary mode, but there is not a lot
of documentation!
i can't share the installation scripts (pos
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 01:23:52PM +0200, Peter Rockai (mornfall) wrote:
>Hello!
>
>I'm looking for sponsor for the $SUBJ, until i finish my NM application. The
>package is available at:
>deb http://www.kalyxo.org/debian unstable main
I run pbuilder on the source debian package. The output is at
Hi,
Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:15:58AM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
> > Anyway I think as perl is not build-essential, itself should show up in
> > Build-Depends even.
>
> /usr/bin/perl is in perl-base, which is Essential and therefore
> build-essential. XML::Parse
Hello Dan,
why i receive this mails two time?
regards nico
--
Nico Golde - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.ngolde.de
GPG: FF46 E565 5CC1 E2E5 3F69 C739 1D87 E549 7364 7CFF
Is there life after /sbin/halt -p?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:50:46PM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
>Okay, new (-4) package uploaded with new manpage and copyright file.
You didn't put your name, your email address and web site (from where the
original package was downloaded) in the copyright file.
>--
>Dan Korostelev <[EMAIL PROT
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:43:28PM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 01:23:52PM +0200, Peter Rockai (mornfall) wrote:
> >I'm looking for sponsor for the $SUBJ, until i finish my NM application. The
> >package is available at:
> >deb http://www.kalyxo.org/debian unstab
Okay, new (-4) package uploaded with new manpage and copyright file.
--
Dan Korostelev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 09:17 +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
> Here's an improved version of the manpage. It still needs some work.
GNOME PPP is not only a accound configurer like wvdialconf. It is a
graphical frontend, a graphical dialer. It can dial, show status icon
and show some details, much like
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 10:01:50AM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
>On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 13:30 +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
>>Your debian/copyright file is broken. Please read [0] and [1] and change
>>your debian/copyright file accordingly.
>
>Somehow fixed, please check the revision 3 of th
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 01:59, Dan Korostelev wrote:
> Now you can download the test package of GNOME PPP from mentors.debian.
> net. I hope it works.
Here's an improved version of the manpage. It still needs some work.
--
Thomas
manpage.1'. You may view
the manual page with: `docbook-to-ma
On Monday 28 June 2004 05:43, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 01:23:52PM +0200, Peter Rockai (mornfall) wrote:
> >I'm looking for sponsor for the $SUBJ, until i finish my NM application.
> > The package is available at:
> >deb http://www.kalyxo.org/debian unstable main
>
>
Hi
i want to build 2 packages that install two different versions of the
same program.
everything is shared between the 2 packages except the binary files.
i try to use the dh_make in multiple binary mode, but there is not a lot
of documentation!
i can't share the installation scripts (postinst
More changes have been made... Fingers crossed the package is okay
now!
still looking for a sponsor..
I am looking for a sponsor for rlplot, a GUI based program to generate
quality scientific graphs. It adds several features which are not readily
available with other plotting packages like gnuplo
Hi,
Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:15:58AM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
> > Anyway I think as perl is not build-essential, itself should show up in
> > Build-Depends even.
>
> /usr/bin/perl is in perl-base, which is Essential and therefore
> build-essential. XML::Parse
I made a package for gnome-ppp to fix #251472, and now looking for
someone who will upload the package in Debian. It's available on http://
mentors.debian.net, package name is "gnome-ppp". Thanks.
--
Dan Korostelev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:43:28PM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 01:23:52PM +0200, Peter Rockai (mornfall) wrote:
> >I'm looking for sponsor for the $SUBJ, until i finish my NM application. The
> >package is available at:
> >deb http://www.kalyxo.org/debian unstab
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 13:30 +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> W: gnome-ppp: manpage-section-mismatch usr/share/man/man1/gnome-ppp.1.gz:54 1
> != SECTION
Fixed
> There is no "closes: #251472" in your debian/changelog file to close the
> ITP.
Fixed
> BTW, why http://bugs.debian.org/251472 h
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 02:28 +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
> - latest Standards-Version is 3.6.1.0,
Fixed
> - you should define man 'SECTION' to 1 in debian/gnome-ppp.sgml,
Fixed
> - you may ask upstream for some strange warnings while compiling like:
> gnome-ppp-wvdialconf.c: In function
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 09:17 +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
> Here's an improved version of the manpage. It still needs some work.
GNOME PPP is not only a accound configurer like wvdialconf. It is a
graphical frontend, a graphical dialer. It can dial, show status icon
and show some details, much like
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 01:59, Dan Korostelev wrote:
> Now you can download the test package of GNOME PPP from mentors.debian.
> net. I hope it works.
Here's an improved version of the manpage. It still needs some work.
--
Thomas
manpage.1'. You may view
the manual page with: `docbook-to-ma
On Monday 28 June 2004 05:43, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 01:23:52PM +0200, Peter Rockai (mornfall) wrote:
> >I'm looking for sponsor for the $SUBJ, until i finish my NM application.
> > The package is available at:
> >deb http://www.kalyxo.org/debian unstable main
>
>
89 matches
Mail list logo
