I am new here.
I have debianized a package named "fvwm-themes".
I have it made with instrucktion from original developer.
Now this package is so i think ready to test and ready to show to an sponsor.
The original developer have me say, how he want.
* a entry in the original Makefile.am "deb-dist" a
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 09:57:10AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 04:54:42PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> for practice and because I want to use it, I am working on a package of
> >> the CVS version of auctex, a
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 09:57:10AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 04:54:42PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> for practice and because I want to use it, I am working on a package of
> >> the CVS version of auctex, a
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 04:22:57PM +0200, Julien Barnier wrote:
> "Bernhard R. Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> > dpkg-buildpackage cannot create a orig.tar.gz, as something original
> > has already to be there. (Try putting the upstream source code renamed
> > there). In order to dpkg-buildpackage ev
"Bernhard R. Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> dpkg-buildpackage cannot create a orig.tar.gz, as something original
> has already to be there. (Try putting the upstream source code renamed
> there). In order to dpkg-buildpackage even trying, you need to have a
> version number ending with a debian-spe
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 01:47:59PM +0200, Celso Gonz?lez wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 01:33:18PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > #include
> > * Celso Gonz?lez [Fri, Aug 01 2003, 01:14:33PM]:
> >
> > > So when the uploader checks the name of the Maintainer in the control
> > > file (not utf-8)
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 04:22:57PM +0200, Julien Barnier wrote:
> "Bernhard R. Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> > dpkg-buildpackage cannot create a orig.tar.gz, as something original
> > has already to be there. (Try putting the upstream source code renamed
> > there). In order to dpkg-buildpackage ev
"Bernhard R. Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> dpkg-buildpackage cannot create a orig.tar.gz, as something original
> has already to be there. (Try putting the upstream source code renamed
> there). In order to dpkg-buildpackage even trying, you need to have a
> version number ending with a debian-spe
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 07:30:20AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > But presumably you _would_ have a problem with:
> > - the old library trying to look up a string which isn't there anymore in
> > the new library
> > - the new library trying to look up a string which isn't there in the old
>
#include
* Celso González [Fri, Aug 01 2003, 01:14:33PM]:
> So when the uploader checks the name of the Maintainer in the control
> file (not utf-8) with the name in the changelog says that are different,
^
Why not? If you are not making a Description translation for DDTP, ther
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 01:14:33PM +0200, Celso Gonz?lez wrote:
> I have a problem with debian policy 3.6.0
>
> One of the news of this version is that changelog _should_ be in utf-8
> In my case the changelog should not be in utf-8 :)
>
> I have iconv'ed my changelog to be fully utf-8, but my na
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 01:47:59PM +0200, Celso González wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 01:33:18PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > #include
> > * Celso González [Fri, Aug 01 2003, 01:14:33PM]:
> >
> > > So when the uploader checks the name of the Maintainer in the control
> > > file (not utf-8)
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 01:33:18PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> * Celso González [Fri, Aug 01 2003, 01:14:33PM]:
>
> > So when the uploader checks the name of the Maintainer in the control
> > file (not utf-8) with the name in the changelog says that are different,
> ^
Celso González (2003-08-01 13:14:33 +0200) :
> One of the news of this version is that changelog _should_ be in
> utf-8 In my case the changelog should not be in utf-8 :)
>
> I have iconv'ed my changelog to be fully utf-8, but my name has a
> "strange character" that gets converted
>
> So when the
Hi
I have a problem with debian policy 3.6.0
One of the news of this version is that changelog _should_ be in utf-8
In my case the changelog should not be in utf-8 :)
I have iconv'ed my changelog to be fully utf-8, but my name has a
"strange character" that gets converted
So when the uploader
On Aug 1, Matthias Urlichs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> > But presumably you _would_ have a problem with:
> > - the old library trying to look up a string which isn't there anymore in
> > the new library
> > - the new library trying to look up a string which
Hi.
Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>Either I don't understand your sentence, or I have a problem reading the
>policy. In
Or I was wrong. :)
>file:///usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy.html/ch-miscellaneous.html#s-deb
>ianrules
>
>I can find statements about the targets binary-arch and bi
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 07:30:20AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > But presumably you _would_ have a problem with:
> > - the old library trying to look up a string which isn't there anymore in
> > the new library
> > - the new library trying to look up a string which isn't there in the old
>
#include
* Celso González [Fri, Aug 01 2003, 01:14:33PM]:
> So when the uploader checks the name of the Maintainer in the control
> file (not utf-8) with the name in the changelog says that are different,
^
Why not? If you are not making a Description translation for DDTP, ther
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 01:14:33PM +0200, Celso Gonz?lez wrote:
> I have a problem with debian policy 3.6.0
>
> One of the news of this version is that changelog _should_ be in utf-8
> In my case the changelog should not be in utf-8 :)
>
> I have iconv'ed my changelog to be fully utf-8, but my na
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 01:33:18PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> * Celso González [Fri, Aug 01 2003, 01:14:33PM]:
>
> > So when the uploader checks the name of the Maintainer in the control
> > file (not utf-8) with the name in the changelog says that are different,
> ^
Celso Gonz+AOE-lez (2003-08-01 13:14:33 +-0200) :
> One of the news of this version is that changelog _should_ be in
> utf-8 In my case the changelog should not be in utf-8 :)
>
> I have iconv'ed my changelog to be fully utf-8, but my name has a
> "strange character" that gets converted
>
> So whe
Hi
I have a problem with debian policy 3.6.0
One of the news of this version is that changelog _should_ be in utf-8
In my case the changelog should not be in utf-8 :)
I have iconv'ed my changelog to be fully utf-8, but my name has a
"strange character" that gets converted
So when the uploader
On Aug 1, Matthias Urlichs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> > But presumably you _would_ have a problem with:
> > - the old library trying to look up a string which isn't there anymore in
> > the new library
> > - the new library trying to look up a string which
Hi.
Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>Either I don't understand your sentence, or I have a problem reading the
>policy. In
Or I was wrong. :)
>file:///usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy.html/ch-miscellaneous.html#s-deb
>ianrules
>
>I can find statements about the targets binary-arch and bi
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 09:59:26AM +0200, Jaime Robles wrote:
> I have found part of the error...
> KPustButton (at kpushbutton.h), as you said below is in kdelibs4-dev package.
> The problem is that the file that should have the "#include "
> is automatically generated during building using "uic"
Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 04:54:42PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> for practice and because I want to use it, I am working on a package of
>> the CVS version of auctex, a LaTeX mode for Emacs. Since it's only an
>> Emacs-addon written in Lisp, it'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Lunes, 28 de Julio de 2003 23:51, Joshua Kwan escribió:
> Sounds like some #include is missing for KPushButton.
I have found part of the error...
KPustButton (at kpushbutton.h), as you said below is in kdelibs4-dev package.
The problem is that the
Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank Küster wrote:
>> In the original package's control file, there is a line of
>> Build-Depends-Indep, but no Build-Depends. Does this make sense for a
>> source package that has no architecture dependent binary packages at
>> all? Why not just use
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 09:59:26AM +0200, Jaime Robles wrote:
> I have found part of the error...
> KPustButton (at kpushbutton.h), as you said below is in kdelibs4-dev package.
> The problem is that the file that should have the "#include "
> is automatically generated during building using "uic"
Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 04:54:42PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> for practice and because I want to use it, I am working on a package of
>> the CVS version of auctex, a LaTeX mode for Emacs. Since it's only an
>> Emacs-addon written in Lisp, it'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Lunes, 28 de Julio de 2003 23:51, Joshua Kwan escribió:
> Sounds like some #include is missing for KPushButton.
I have found part of the error...
KPustButton (at kpushbutton.h), as you said below is in kdelibs4-dev package.
The problem is that the
Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank Küster wrote:
>> In the original package's control file, there is a line of
>> Build-Depends-Indep, but no Build-Depends. Does this make sense for a
>> source package that has no architecture dependent binary packages at
>> all? Why not just use
Hi, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> But presumably you _would_ have a problem with:
> - the old library trying to look up a string which isn't there anymore in
> the new library
> - the new library trying to look up a string which isn't there in the old
> library
Of course the message catalog would c
34 matches
Mail list logo
