On Aug 1, Matthias Urlichs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hi, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > > But presumably you _would_ have a problem with: > > - the old library trying to look up a string which isn't there anymore in > > the new library > > - the new library trying to look up a string which isn't there in the old > > library > > Of course the message catalog would contain the union of strings > from both libraries, not its intersection. > > I'd think that'd be obvious...
That's the point where it would be much easier to version the message package rather than attempt to keep track of which strings were for the old library, which for the new, etc. -- Neil Roeth
