Oops, I accidentally cut off portions of the original email I intended
to send here is something like what was missing:
I'm looking for a sponsor for my pdsh package which is currently
available at:
http://users.ntsource.com/~bpellin/debian/
I consider it to be ready for use except possibly f
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Commercialization of this product is prohibited without notifying the
Department of Energy (DOE) or Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
(LLNL)."
This seems to me to conflict with the GPL, and I'd like confirmation on
that. I guess if it is, then the proper proce
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 10:57:28AM +0200, francesco levorato wrote:
> i was adviced to write a more explaining mail about the package i am
> asking a sponsor for.
> minido is "a simple, generic, multi-user, database free todo list
> manager / tracking system written in GTK2"
> simple mean that it i
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 11:55:21AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Matt Kraai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote*:
> >discusses merging the sponsorship program and the WNPP. I believe
> >all of the objections were addressed. May I implement the
> >proposal, or did I miss something?
[...]
> Also: What are
Hi all,
A little while ago I filed an ITA on wmakerconf and wmakerconf-data.
With some help and advice from Bastian Kleineidam, I've fixed a number of
bugs and updated wmakerconf to stop using the deprecated proplist
interface. Preliminary packages are available here:
deb http://borex.princet
Oops, I accidentally cut off portions of the original email I intended
to send here is something like what was missing:
I'm looking for a sponsor for my pdsh package which is currently
available at:
http://users.ntsource.com/~bpellin/debian/
I consider it to be ready for use except possibly for
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Commercialization of this product is prohibited without notifying the
Department of Energy (DOE) or Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
(LLNL)."
This seems to me to conflict with the GPL, and I'd like confirmation on
that. I guess if it is, then the proper procedur
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 10:57:28AM +0200, francesco levorato wrote:
> i was adviced to write a more explaining mail about the package i am
> asking a sponsor for.
> minido is "a simple, generic, multi-user, database free todo list
> manager / tracking system written in GTK2"
> simple mean that it i
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 11:55:21AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Matt Kraai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote*:
> >discusses merging the sponsorship program and the WNPP. I believe
> >all of the objections were addressed. May I implement the
> >proposal, or did I miss something?
[...]
> Also: What are
On Monday, Jun 30, 2003, at 07:53 US/Eastern, Sven Dowideit wrote:
Hello
I am working on updating the Twiki debian package, and my sponsor
(Ardo)
and I have hit a problem that we are unsure how to resolve.
May I suggest contacting upstream and asking if Debian's normal way is
OK? That'd b
Hi all,
A little while ago I filed an ITA on wmakerconf and wmakerconf-data.
With some help and advice from Bastian Kleineidam, I've fixed a number of
bugs and updated wmakerconf to stop using the deprecated proplist
interface. Preliminary packages are available here:
deb http://borex.princet
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 03:30:26PM +0200, francesco levorato wrote:
> i cant get the man page installed properly:
> i first did the routine manually to check for errors, thats what i did:
> 1. edited the sgml template created by dh_make, calledo it minido.sgml,
> 2. created the minido.1 with docboo
On Monday, Jun 30, 2003, at 07:53 US/Eastern, Sven Dowideit wrote:
Hello
I am working on updating the Twiki debian package, and my sponsor
(Ardo)
and I have hit a problem that we are unsure how to resolve.
May I suggest contacting upstream and asking if Debian's normal way is
OK? That'd be by f
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 09:53:30PM +1000, Sven Dowideit wrote:
> I am working on updating the Twiki debian package, and my sponsor (Ardo)
> and I have hit a problem that we are unsure how to resolve.
> I am unhappy with the idea of re-naming the upstream license.txt to
> copyright and then editin
I'm trying to adopt the upsd package, and I have been unable to contact
the sponsor I had found for more than 2 months now. I have packages ready
to upload; if there is someone who is willing to help me out please let me
know!
--Nick
i was adviced to write a more explaining mail about the package i am
asking a sponsor for.
minido is "a simple, generic, multi-user, database free todo list
manager / tracking system written in GTK2"
simple mean that it is really simple to use (interface has a total of 4
buttons ;)
minido is also
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 03:30:26PM +0200, francesco levorato wrote:
> i cant get the man page installed properly:
> i first did the routine manually to check for errors, thats what i did:
> 1. edited the sgml template created by dh_make, calledo it minido.sgml,
> 2. created the minido.1 with docboo
Kai Hendry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Firstly, I think there is Debian Python Policy. But I can't find it. Any
> clues?
>
[...]
> I looked closely at pyblosxom, but I am a little bit confused how under
> debian/ there is pyblosxom/ with everything again with the directory
> structure. Is that
(Warning: I don't actually maintain any Python modules, only programs.)
On Sun, 2003-06-29 at 13:45, Kai Hendry wrote:
> Today I have spent a few hours trying to package a python library called
> lupy.
>
> http://www.divmod.org/Lupy/
>
> Firstly, I think there is Debian Python Policy. But I can'
On 29 Jun 2003, francesco levorato wrote:
> I am looking for sponsor for the package minido.
Tell us what it is in the e-mail. Saves a bit of time for people who might
be interested but don't want to possibly waste the time of checking the app
site.
- Matt
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 09:53:30PM +1000, Sven Dowideit wrote:
> I am working on updating the Twiki debian package, and my sponsor (Ardo)
> and I have hit a problem that we are unsure how to resolve.
> I am unhappy with the idea of re-naming the upstream license.txt to
> copyright and then editin
I'm trying to adopt the upsd package, and I have been unable to contact
the sponsor I had found for more than 2 months now. I have packages ready
to upload; if there is someone who is willing to help me out please let me
know!
--Nick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
i was adviced to write a more explaining mail about the package i am
asking a sponsor for.
minido is "a simple, generic, multi-user, database free todo list
manager / tracking system written in GTK2"
simple mean that it is really simple to use (interface has a total of 4
buttons ;)
minido is also
Kai Hendry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Firstly, I think there is Debian Python Policy. But I can't find it. Any
> clues?
>
[...]
> I looked closely at pyblosxom, but I am a little bit confused how under
> debian/ there is pyblosxom/ with everything again with the directory
> structure. Is that
(Warning: I don't actually maintain any Python modules, only programs.)
On Sun, 2003-06-29 at 13:45, Kai Hendry wrote:
> Today I have spent a few hours trying to package a python library called
> lupy.
>
> http://www.divmod.org/Lupy/
>
> Firstly, I think there is Debian Python Policy. But I can'
On 29 Jun 2003, francesco levorato wrote:
> I am looking for sponsor for the package minido.
Tell us what it is in the e-mail. Saves a bit of time for people who might
be interested but don't want to possibly waste the time of checking the app
site.
- Matt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Hello
I am working on updating the Twiki debian package, and my sponsor (Ardo)
and I have hit a problem that we are unsure how to resolve.
I am unhappy with the idea of re-naming the upstream license.txt to
copyright and then editing it to link to the common-licenses GPL file.
This is due to the
Matt Kraai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote*:
>discusses merging the sponsorship program and the WNPP. I believe
>all of the objections were addressed. May I implement the
>proposal, or did I miss something?
Aside from the results of the thread that followed (discuss with web people who
maintain WNPP li
Am Montag, 30. Juni 2003 03:44 schrieben Sie:
> Below, you said that gsoap is a new package. You should file an
> ITP (intent to package), follow the instructions at:
>
> http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
>
Hi,
I created the ITP and uploaded a new version of the package that
closes the bug.
Tom
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 18:10 +0200, Thomas Wana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I packaged the gSOAP stub and skeleton compiler for C/C++ for
> Debian. It's not a complex package, with one binary, one include
> file and four static libs (and a bunch of sample files), so it
> shouldn't cause headache
Hello
I am working on updating the Twiki debian package, and my sponsor (Ardo)
and I have hit a problem that we are unsure how to resolve.
I am unhappy with the idea of re-naming the upstream license.txt to
copyright and then editing it to link to the common-licenses GPL file.
This is due to the
Matt Kraai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote*:
>discusses merging the sponsorship program and the WNPP. I believe
>all of the objections were addressed. May I implement the
>proposal, or did I miss something?
Aside from the results of the thread that followed (discuss with web people who
maintain WNPP li
Am Montag, 30. Juni 2003 03:44 schrieben Sie:
> Below, you said that gsoap is a new package. You should file an
> ITP (intent to package), follow the instructions at:
>
> http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
>
Hi,
I created the ITP and uploaded a new version of the package that
closes the bug.
Tom
>Commercialization of this product is prohibited without notifying the
>Department of Energy (DOE) or Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
>(LLNL)."
>
> This seems to me to conflict with the GPL, and I'd like confirmation on
> that. I guess if it is, then the proper procedure would
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 18:10 +0200, Thomas Wana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I packaged the gSOAP stub and skeleton compiler for C/C++ for
> Debian. It's not a complex package, with one binary, one include
> file and four static libs (and a bunch of sample files), so it
> shouldn't cause headache
>Commercialization of this product is prohibited without notifying the
>Department of Energy (DOE) or Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
>(LLNL)."
>
> This seems to me to conflict with the GPL, and I'd like confirmation on
> that. I guess if it is, then the proper procedure would
Hi again, mentors.
Few days ago I tried to convince you to upload pose, a Palm OS Emulator.
Today I pretend you to upload the skins for this emulator, a package called
pose-skins.
The sources can be get by visiting:
http://www.superiodico.net/debian/upload/pose-skins/
And the package info com
Howdy,
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2003/debian-mentors-200303/msg00096.html
discusses merging the sponsorship program and the WNPP. I believe
all of the objections were addressed. May I implement the
proposal, or did I miss something?
--
Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi again, mentors.
Few days ago I tried to convince you to upload pose, a Palm OS Emulator.
Today I pretend you to upload the skins for this emulator, a package called
pose-skins.
The sources can be get by visiting:
http://www.superiodico.net/debian/upload/pose-skins/
And the package info com
Howdy,
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2003/debian-mentors-200303/msg00096.html
discusses merging the sponsorship program and the WNPP. I believe
all of the objections were addressed. May I implement the
proposal, or did I miss something?
--
Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
40 matches
Mail list logo
