Stephan A Suerken schrieb am Mittwoch, den 27. Oktober 1999:
> I am a little bit confused if /usr/X11R6/man is still conforming to
> policy 3.0.0.
>
> According to section 5.8, /usr/X11R6/bin seems to be the right place
> to put programs "for the X Windows System". There is no word about
> where
Joel Klecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 04:53 + 1999-10-27, David Coe wrote:
> >/usr/lib/portsentry is indeed the right place, as long as the scripts
> >don't change other than at installation/upgrade time.
>
> Actually, since they are perl and therefore architecture independant,
> /us
Hi,
I've searched all the docs I can find and trolled through the Debian
website, but I haven't seen any mention of `task-' as a prefix for a
package name. Does it have a specific meaning, and is there a policy?
Peace,
* Kurt Starsinic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - Technical Specialist *
I am a little bit confused if /usr/X11R6/man is still conforming to
policy 3.0.0.
According to section 5.8, /usr/X11R6/bin seems to be the right place
to put programs "for the X Windows System". There is no word about
where to place the according man pages in this section.
Section 6.1 says: "You
At 04:53 + 1999-10-27, David Coe wrote:
/usr/lib/portsentry is indeed the right place, as long as the scripts
don't change other than at installation/upgrade time.
Actually, since they are perl and therefore architecture independant,
/usr/share/portsentry is better.
--
Joel Klecker (aka E
On Wed, Oct 27, 1999 at 04:53:04AM +, David Coe wrote:
> /usr/lib/portsentry is indeed the right place, as long as the scripts
> don't change other than at installation/upgrade time.
Then I'll put them in there, thanks.
>
> Sorry for my confusion.
Sorry for causing confusion...my posting was r
David Coe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Guido Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I don't want to put them in /usr/sbin (where portsentry resides). What's a
> > good place to put them in? I thought about /usr/lib/portsentry/ - is this
> > FHS
> > compliant?
>
> No. Variable data can't g
On Tue, Oct 26, 1999 at 05:29:27PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Oh. Come on. I think Peter is allowed to do a binary-only NMU of his
> own package, like everybody else :-)
>
> This numbering scheme and its purpose is documented in the Developer's
> Reference. Being the rationale the same (i.e. to
8 matches
Mail list logo