Stephan A Suerken schrieb am Mittwoch, den 27. Oktober 1999:
> I am a little bit confused if /usr/X11R6/man is still conforming to
> policy 3.0.0.
>
> According to section 5.8, /usr/X11R6/bin seems to be the right place
> to put programs "for the X Windows System". There is no word about
> where to place the according man pages in this section.
>
> Section 6.1 says: "You must install manual pages (...) in appropriate
> places under `/usr/share/man'."
>
> (Newest) potato lintian reports an error if a man page for a program
> in /usr/X11R6/bin is in /usr/share/man, however intian may be wrong.
>
> So what is the right thing to do?
Policy 3.* conforms to FHS 2, which says:
Manual pages for commands and data under /usr/local are stored in
/usr/local/man. Manual pages for X11R6 are stored in /usr/X11R6/man.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
It follows that all manual page hierarchies in the system should have
the same structure as /usr/share/man. Empty directories may be
omitted from a manual page hierarchy. For example, if /usr/local/man
has no manual pages in section 4 (Devices), then /usr/local/man/man4
may be omitted.
Tschoeeee
Roland
--
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.spinnaker.de/ *
