On Tue, Oct 26, 1999 at 05:29:27PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > Oh. Come on. I think Peter is allowed to do a binary-only NMU of his > own package, like everybody else :-) > > This numbering scheme and its purpose is documented in the Developer's > Reference. Being the rationale the same (i.e. to not force a recompile on > every arch), I don't see a good reason why others are allowed to do this > when doing a binary-only NMU and Peter should not be.
Hmm, OK I forgot that policy allowed this. Can't say I like it much though. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB. CCs of replies on mailing lists are welcome.
