Re: Orthanc 0.6.2 - Review needed for "Orthanc Client"

2013-10-17 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Sebastien, On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 03:12:48PM +0200, Sebastien Jodogne wrote: > Anyway, before each release, I apply automated integration tests > that challenge Orthanc with a set of DICOM images. So, if the Web > interface is reachable, Orthanc should be correctly working. +1 > >Well, "requ

Re: Orthanc 0.6.2 - Review needed for "Orthanc Client"

2013-10-16 Thread Sebastien Jodogne
Hi Andreas, Hmmm, there are people out there who so not have any DICOM files at hand and I belong to this minority. ;-) Honestly speaking: I'm not a medical imaging expert at all or more generally I have not more than common sense about any medical topic. So if you want more testers we need t

Re: Orthanc 0.6.2 - Review needed for "Orthanc Client"

2013-10-16 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Sebastien, On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 02:58:07PM +0200, Sebastien Jodogne wrote: > >Not hurt feeling here :) Just glad someone actually reads the > >README... who said anyway when all else fails read the instructions > >:-P > > Fine! Glad that everything is OK :) :) I think we should not feel vu

Re: Orthanc 0.6.2 - Review needed for "Orthanc Client"

2013-10-16 Thread Sebastien Jodogne
Not hurt feeling here :) Just glad someone actually reads the README... who said anyway when all else fails read the instructions :-P Fine! Glad that everything is OK :) :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas

Re: Orthanc 0.6.2 - Review needed for "Orthanc Client"

2013-10-16 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Sebastien Jodogne wrote: > Hi Matthieu, > >>> OK. I did so and it is great that you did document this in >>> README.Debian which is very helpful for users starting with a package. >> >> >> >> http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/orthanc/trunk

Re: Orthanc 0.6.2 - Review needed for "Orthanc Client"

2013-10-16 Thread Sebastien Jodogne
Hi Matthieu, OK. I did so and it is great that you did document this in README.Debian which is very helpful for users starting with a package. http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/orthanc/trunk/debian/README.Debian?view=log Yes, thank you 'Sébastien' for this helpful RE

Re: Orthanc 0.6.2 - Review needed for "Orthanc Client"

2013-10-16 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Sebastien, > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 01:34:53PM +0200, Sebastien Jodogne wrote: >> >I have no idea how to really test the binary packages but I surely can >> >verify whether the package builds or not and finally upload if it looks >> >OK

Re: Orthanc 0.6.2 - Review needed for "Orthanc Client"

2013-10-16 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Sebastien, On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 01:34:53PM +0200, Sebastien Jodogne wrote: > >I have no idea how to really test the binary packages but I surely can > >verify whether the package builds or not and finally upload if it looks > >OK which I can confirm so far. > > The most basic test consists

Re: Orthanc 0.6.2 - Review needed for "Orthanc Client"

2013-10-16 Thread Sebastien Jodogne
Dear Andreas, I have just uploaded a Debian package for Orthanc 0.6.2 that has been released earlier this week Thank you much for your feedback! I have no idea how to really test the binary packages but I surely can verify whether the package builds or not and finally upload if it looks O

Re: Orthanc 0.6.2 - Review needed for "Orthanc Client"

2013-10-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Sébastien, On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 05:46:23PM +0200, s.jodo...@chu.ulg.ac.be wrote: > I have just uploaded a Debian package for Orthanc 0.6.2 that has been > released earlier this week [1]. I have no idea how to really test the binary packages but I surely can verify whether the package build