Hi Andreas,
Hmmm, there are people out there who so not have any DICOM files at hand
and I belong to this minority. ;-) Honestly speaking: I'm not a
medical imaging expert at all or more generally I have not more than
common sense about any medical topic. So if you want more testers we
need to relay on other users. But I think once the Debian package is
uploaded people will respond with bug reports, if something doese not
work.
:)
Anyway, before each release, I apply automated integration tests that
challenge Orthanc with a set of DICOM images. So, if the Web interface
is reachable, Orthanc should be correctly working.
As far as lintian is concerned, I was indeed not using the latest
version of the software. I now have the same warnings as you.
Well, "required" is a hard category. It is not really required to
regard these both issues, but sooner or later we should deal with this.
Just tell me, whether you want to have the package super clean or
whether I should upload for the moment and we leave this for some
later point in time.
Because this release fixes the serious #724947 issue and because the
other points can be delayed, I would indeed favor the upload of the
package as such.
I have just created a Trello card to track the aforementioned problems
[1]. Using another source package for jQuery-related stuff will oblige
me to refactor large parts of the upstream package.
Just a last question: Should I pay attention to the
"possible-documentation-but-no-doc-base-registration" lintian warning [2]?
Sébastien-
[1] https://trello.com/c/Xs3rqadE
[2]
http://lintian.debian.org/tags/possible-documentation-but-no-doc-base-registration.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/525e90d0.6020...@chu.ulg.ac.be
