Steffen Möller writes:
>> ncbi-cn3d would do, but cn3d is pretty unique such that IMHO it could
>> also stand alone.
Sure, it's more a question of uniformity vs. simplicity.
>> You may decide to have ncbi-tools-x11 depend or at least recommend on
>> it.
Don't worry, I plan to. Maybe depend fo
On 19.02.19 17:39, Steffen Möller wrote:
On 18.02.19 16:39, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Andreas Tille writes:
Sidenote: Should cn3d be a separate binary package? I am a fan.
That's a different question - I have put Aaron in CC.
Sure, I can split it out if that would be helpful; thanks for calli
On 18.02.19 16:39, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Andreas Tille writes:
Sidenote: Should cn3d be a separate binary package? I am a fan.
That's a different question - I have put Aaron in CC.
Sure, I can split it out if that would be helpful; thanks for calling
the suggestion to my attention. I'm inc
Andreas Tille writes:
>> Sidenote: Should cn3d be a separate binary package? I am a fan.
>
> That's a different question - I have put Aaron in CC.
Sure, I can split it out if that would be helpful; thanks for calling
the suggestion to my attention. I'm inclined to call the binary package
ncbi-c
Hi Steffen,
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 01:46:31PM +0100, Steffen Möller wrote:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/ncbi-tools6/blob/master/debian/upstream/metadata
>
> I just used "Debian-package" to help assigning not only the Paper (of
> Cn3D) to a package (ncbi-tools-x11) but analogously assig
Hello,
on
https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/ncbi-tools6/blob/master/debian/upstream/metadata
I just used "Debian-package" to help assigning not only the Paper (of
Cn3D) to a package (ncbi-tools-x11) but analogously assigned the RRIDs.
It looks like
Registry:
- Name: bio.tools
Entry: cn3d
6 matches
Mail list logo
