Steffen Möller <steffen_moel...@gmx.de> writes: >> ncbi-cn3d would do, but cn3d is pretty unique such that IMHO it could >> also stand alone.
Sure, it's more a question of uniformity vs. simplicity. >> You may decide to have ncbi-tools-x11 depend or at least recommend on >> it. Don't worry, I plan to. Maybe depend for now, recommend the following release cycle. > Uh - I wanted to have started and ended with some big thanks for your > work on all these NCBI tools. Messed that one up. No offense taken. Copying me might have been nice, though -- I don't follow the list very closely, or via e-mail. (Rather, I use Gmane's NNTP mirror.) > So, now: Many thanks for all these efforts. Much appreciated! You're quite welcome. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?a...@monk.mit.edu
