On 19.02.19 17:39, Steffen Möller wrote:
On 18.02.19 16:39, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Andreas Tille <andr...@fam-tille.de> writes:
Sidenote: Should cn3d be a separate binary package? I am a fan.
That's a different question - I have put Aaron in CC.
Sure, I can split it out if that would be helpful; thanks for calling
the suggestion to my attention. I'm inclined to call the binary package
ncbi-cn3d for consistency with other NCBI package names.
Hi Aaron,
ncbi-cn3d would do, but cn3d is pretty unique such that IMHO it could
also
stand alone. You may decide to have ncbi-tools-x11 depend or at least
recommend on it.
Best,
Steffen
Uh - I wanted to have started and ended with some big thanks for your
work on all these NCBI tools. Messed that one up.
So, now: Many thanks for all these efforts. Much appreciated!
Steffen
