> But what would be the point? You'd end up with a less-tested version
> of 10.3 compared to regular buster and if people need to move from
> 10.1 to 10.3, they can just as well upgrade to Buster.
>
> So, advise people to upgrade for anyone running the -server packages and
> keep the client-side to
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 09:24:48PM +0200, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> > But what would be the point? You'd end up with a less-tested version
> > of 10.3 compared to regular buster and if people need to move from
> > 10.1 to 10.3, they can just as well upgrade to Buster.
> >
> > So, advise people to up
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 07:56:30PM +0200, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Hello!
>
> > >> During the 10.5 packaging cycle I have tested building backports for
> > >> every commit (see e.g.
> > >> https://salsa.debian.org/mariadb-team/mariadb-10.5/-/pipelines/191851).
> > >> The galera-4 dependency is alr
Hello!
> >> During the 10.5 packaging cycle I have tested building backports for
> >> every commit (see e.g.
> >> https://salsa.debian.org/mariadb-team/mariadb-10.5/-/pipelines/191851).
> >> The galera-4 dependency is already available in
> >> stretch-backports-sloppy. If you are interested in bac
On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 at 21:02, Holger Levsen wrote:
..
> > What options do we have anyway? Does the LTS team think they should be
> > responsible for providing security updates beyond what upstreams do?
>
> yes, that's what we often do.
Not even MariaDB devs always manage to correctly take patches
On 03/11/2020 20:02, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi Otto,
On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 09:15:32PM +0200, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
I don't have any particular plans. I'll keep updating the package for
as long as upstream provides updates. For 10.1 the updates are indeed
officially over now: https://mariadb.or
Hi Otto,
On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 09:15:32PM +0200, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> I don't have any particular plans. I'll keep updating the package for
> as long as upstream provides updates. For 10.1 the updates are indeed
> officially over now: https://mariadb.org/about/#maintenance-policy
>
> What o
Hello!
I don't have any particular plans. I'll keep updating the package for
as long as upstream provides updates. For 10.1 the updates are indeed
officially over now: https://mariadb.org/about/#maintenance-policy
What options do we have anyway? Does the LTS team think they should be
responsible
Hi,
On Wed, 2020-10-21 at 11:27 +0300, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> I just realized Emilio represents the LTS team and he already took
> care of this.
On a related note, according to
https://mariadb.com/kb/en/mariadb-server/ , support for MariaDB 10.1
ended in October.
Assuming that's still accurat
