Hi Otto, On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 09:15:32PM +0200, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > I don't have any particular plans. I'll keep updating the package for > as long as upstream provides updates. For 10.1 the updates are indeed > officially over now: https://mariadb.org/about/#maintenance-policy > > What options do we have anyway? Does the LTS team think they should be > responsible for providing security updates beyond what upstreams do?
yes, that's what we often do. > Or are you thinking about providing backports? or we do this ;) > During the 10.5 packaging cycle I have tested building backports for > every commit (see e.g. > https://salsa.debian.org/mariadb-team/mariadb-10.5/-/pipelines/191851). > The galera-4 dependency is already available in > stretch-backports-sloppy. If you are interested in backports, that > could be a viable option. how compatible are 10.1 and 10.5? > To decrease the risk of similar situations in the future (or decrease > the time window for it), I am now putting all my effort into having > 10.5 in Bullseye so that the official support period is as long as > possible by using the latest possible upstream version. nice! thanks for all your work on mariadb! -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C ⠈⠳⣄ Dance like no one's watching. Encrypt like everyone is.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
