> But what would be the point? You'd end up with a less-tested version > of 10.3 compared to regular buster and if people need to move from > 10.1 to 10.3, they can just as well upgrade to Buster. > > So, advise people to upgrade for anyone running the -server packages and > keep the client-side tools/libs around?
I was just responding to Adam's and Holger's questions. But if telling users to simply upgrade to Buster is an option, then what is naturally the easiest route to take.
