cab1e_de-scramblers are 100% safe to use and own

2005-07-10 Thread Lindsay toenne
Are you sick and tired of missing the fights on pay-per-vi3w? Do you feel like you have to obtain grown_up DVD'S because pay per view is just not worth the price? Have you been scammed by someone selling you a "descrambled cabl3 box"? We have the solution for you! http://look4site.info you can

Re: Bug#317359: kde: ..3'rd "Help"->"About $KDE-app" tab calls the GPL "License Agreement", ie; a contract.

2005-07-10 Thread Marco d'Itri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I think there's wide agreement here that forced click-wrap licenses >are non-free, and very impractical. I've seen installers in Windows Maybe impractical, but so far I can't see why they should be non-free. -- ciao, Marco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Bug#317359: kde: ..3'rd "Help"->"About $KDE-app" tab calls the GPL "License Agreement", ie; a contract.

2005-07-10 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 11:56:50AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > Maybe impractical, but so far I can't see why they should be non-free. Now you're claiming that an impractical license can be free? I think your notion of what is "free" is so patently absurd that I can't be bothered to argue with yo

Full version of the software.

2005-07-10 Thread Gordon
We focus on OEM and Retail Box for Microsoft, Adobe, Macromedia, Corel, Symantec and more. http://irkr.fmjuiexqu7f4cyx.bursegiemc.info A goal without a plan is just a wish. It's a sign of mediocrity when you demonstrate gratitude with moderation. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P

Re: qlogic firmware license

2005-07-10 Thread Andres Salomon
On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 01:11:46 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 12:01:14 -0400 Andres Salomon wrote: > >> On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 01:59:25 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] >> >> The reason for the dual licensing is because they have OEMs that would >> need to re-qualify (that may b

Re: qlogic firmware license

2005-07-10 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 16:50:53 +0300 Andres Salomon wrote: > On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 01:11:46 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > > On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 12:01:14 -0400 Andres Salomon wrote: [...] > > > So, by > > > dual-licensing, the OEMs can continue using the driver and > > > firmware under the GPL (inv

Re: Bug#317359: kde: ..3'rd "Help"->"About $KDE-app" tab calls the GPL "License Agreement", ie; a contract.

2005-07-10 Thread Sean Kellogg
On Sunday 10 July 2005 03:21 am, Glenn Maynard wrote: > On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 11:56:50AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > Maybe impractical, but so far I can't see why they should be non-free. > > Now you're claiming that an impractical license can be free? I think > your notion of what is "free"

Re: Bug#317359: kde: ..3'rd "Help"->"About $KDE-app" tab calls the GPL "License Agreement", ie; a contract.

2005-07-10 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 05:51:17PM -0700, Sean Kellogg wrote: > Glenn, don't you think he's talking about technologically impractical. We > all > know how easy it is to circumvent click wrap licenses. But you HAVE to agree > to the GPL to download the software, click wrap or not, so its not re