On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 11:56:50AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > Maybe impractical, but so far I can't see why they should be non-free.
Now you're claiming that an impractical license can be free? I think your notion of what is "free" is so patently absurd that I can't be bothered to argue with you--"we require the freedom to modify and distribute, but license restrictions that make those freedoms impractical to exercise are fine!" -- Glenn Maynard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
