On Sunday 10 July 2005 03:21 am, Glenn Maynard wrote: > On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 11:56:50AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > Maybe impractical, but so far I can't see why they should be non-free. > > Now you're claiming that an impractical license can be free? I think > your notion of what is "free" is so patently absurd that I can't be > bothered to argue with you--"we require the freedom to modify and > distribute, but license restrictions that make those freedoms impractical > to exercise are fine!"
Glenn, don't you think he's talking about technologically impractical. We all know how easy it is to circumvent click wrap licenses. But you HAVE to agree to the GPL to download the software, click wrap or not, so its not really impractical from a freedom sense. -Sean -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
