Re: Cryptographic software in main archive

2002-03-26 Thread Anthony Towns
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 05:31:01PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > Although I can see that this conclusion appears reasonable (at least > superficially), I'm not convinced that "trivially convertible" is > sufficient to satisfy the GPL, Then you probably should talk to the FSF about this. It's a f

Re: Cryptographic software in main archive

2002-03-26 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020326 01:06]: > Although the LGPL allows someone to redistribute > affected code under the GPL, by itself it does NOT allow you to > simultaneously distribute that code under both the LGPL and the GPL; Why? When you are allowed to distribute under GPL and y

Re: Financial Restrictions (Was Re: teTeX Documentation Licenses (A), (D) & (H))

2002-03-26 Thread Peter S Galbraith
"C.M. Connelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "TB" == Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> A. > >> [...] > >> You are NOT ALLOWED to take money for the distribution or > >> use of this file or modified versions or fragments thereof, > >> except for a nominal charge f

Re: Financial Restrictions (Was Re: teTeX Documentation Licenses (A), (D) & (H))

2002-03-26 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Looks like words lifted from the Artistic license ( "Reasonable copying > fee" is whatever you can justify on the basis of media cost, duplication > charges, time of people involved, and so on.) In the case of the Artistic License, it was explicitly

Re: Financial Restrictions (Was Re: teTeX Documentation Licenses (A), (D) & (H))

2002-03-26 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Looks like words lifted from the Artistic license ( "Reasonable copying > > fee" is whatever you can justify on the basis of media cost, duplication > > charges, time of people involved, and so o

Re: Financial Restrictions (Was Re: teTeX Documentation Licenses (A), (D) & (H))

2002-03-26 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Right. Let me rephrase it bit. Their license says: > > Permission is granted to reproduce the document in any way providing > that it is distributed for free, except for any reasonable charges for > printing, distribution, staff time, etc. > >

Re: Financial Restrictions (Was Re: teTeX Documentation Licenses (A), (D) & (H))

2002-03-26 Thread Richard Braakman
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 12:55:06PM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > which sounds like the Artistic license's > > "Reasonable copying fee" is whatever you can justify on the basis of > media cost, duplication charges, time of people involved, and so on" The parenthetical comment that follows