Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Right. Let me rephrase it bit. Their license says: > > Permission is granted to reproduce the document in any way providing > that it is distributed for free, except for any reasonable charges for > printing, distribution, staff time, etc. > > which sounds like the Artistic license's > > "Reasonable copying fee" is whatever you can justify on the basis of > media cost, duplication charges, time of people involved, and so on" > > e.g. both sound vague enough to me to drive a truck through. I don't > think we can reasonably say this one is non-free without saying the same > about the Artistic license. This is just one of those points I'd like > to see clarified in a new version of the DFSG.
Except that the Artistic License author also said "it's fine with me if you drive a truck through here". That's the difference. And, he amended the license. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
