On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 12:55:06PM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > which sounds like the Artistic license's > > "Reasonable copying fee" is whatever you can justify on the basis of > media cost, duplication charges, time of people involved, and so on"
The parenthetical comment that follows it is, I think critical here: (You will not be required to justify it to the Copyright Holder, but only to the computing community at large as a market that must bear the fee.) In other words (following capitalist logic): if people pay the fee, then it's reasonable. I think this is different in princible from a license where "reasonable" is determined by the copyright holder, or the courts. Richard Braakman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]