Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license?

2003-08-21 Thread Chris Lawrence
e Software and thus eligible for inclusion in the Debian OS. > > [ ] None of the above statements approximates my opinion. > > Part 2. Status of Respondent > > Please mark with an "X" the following item only if it is true. > > [ X ] I am a Debian Developer a

Re: Linux kernel complete licence check, Q.15

2002-11-24 Thread Chris Lawrence
iguity; it's best to get a clarification from the original author(s) or copyright holder(s), if possible. Chris -- Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.lordsutch.com/chris/ Computer Systems Manager, Physics and Astronomy, Univ. of Mississippi 125B Lewis Hall - 662-915-5765

Re: Knuth statement on renaming cm files and Licence violation.

2002-09-04 Thread Chris Lawrence
Knuth's request is legally binding; his statement that the fonts are "in the public domain" suggests that no request of his regarding the fonts is legally binding, although his wishes should not be lightly disregarded.) Chris -- Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www

Re: GPL-script to be run on a non-free interpreter

2002-08-04 Thread Chris Lawrence
stribution of non-free through requiring any non-free vendor to do their own manual sieve on "sufficiently free to stick on a for-$ CD". Chris -- Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.lordsutch.com/chris/ Instructor and Ph.D. Candidate, Political Science, Univ. of Mississippi 208 Deupree Hall - 662-915-5765

Re: GPL-script to be run on a non-free interpreter

2002-08-04 Thread Chris Lawrence
at least some of) graphviz (http://www.chaosreigns.com/code/springgraph/), and it is entirely possible to develop a free alternative for the particular interpreter in question. Chris -- Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.lordsutch.com/chris/ Instructor and Ph.D. Candidate, Political Science,

Re: Towards a new LPPL draft

2002-07-22 Thread Chris Lawrence
. In practice, the de facto procedures are always followed. Chris [no cc needed] -- Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.lordsutch.com/chris/ Instructor and Ph.D. Candidate, Political Science, Univ. of Mississippi 208 Deupree Hall - 662-915-5765 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E

Re: forwarded message from Jeff Licquia

2002-07-19 Thread Chris Lawrence
expected to behave like standard LaTeX. However, if you represent your derived work as being standard LaTeX (by calling it LaTeX), the behavior should be consistent with standard LaTeX for all macro packages defined in standard LaTeX. Chris -- Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://

Re: Distributing GPL Software as binary ISO

2002-07-18 Thread Chris Lawrence
ficient, or what a "reasonable" price might be. For example, if A distributes Debian without source, and nobody complains that they didn't get source, A is not violating the GPL per se.) In other words: you have opened a massive can of worms. :-) Chris -- Chris Lawrence <[

Re: User's thoughts about LPPL

2002-07-16 Thread Chris Lawrence
erences between article.dtx as distributed by the LaTeX3 project and my article.dtx (for example, "corrected typo in line 300 that stopped articles with fewer than 83 pages from having more than 17 footnotes".) Then again, maybe I'm missing the point :-) Chris -- Chris Law

Endorsements (was Re: GPL compatibility of DFCL)

2002-06-15 Thread Chris Lawrence
, in fact, like goats, and while you're at it take my damn name off!" (*). Don't mind me, I'm not really awake :-) Chris -- Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.lordsutch.com/chris/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: debian-legal list entry - confidential information disclosure

2002-03-11 Thread Chris Lawrence
sts are archived and nevertheless claimed some sort of proprietary interest in the mail I am replying to. Chris -- Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.lordsutch.com/chris/

Re: teTeX Documentation Licenses

2002-03-10 Thread Chris Lawrence
of the attached licenses are DFSG-free, with the possible exception of the guy who goes on about "GNU-style" stuff (who needs to properly license the file). The one that's written in French I can't be certain of, but I suspect it's not DFSG-free either. Chris -- Ch

Re: Legal status of using a GPL'd LD_PRELOADed with a non-GPL'd app ...

2002-03-06 Thread Chris Lawrence
is incredibly trivial, so it's hard to argue that even it is infringement (especially since an end-user doing this independently wouldn't be infringement, and you could tell an end-user how to do this in documentation). Chris -- Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.lordsutch.com/chris/

Re: Latex Project Public License

2002-02-20 Thread Chris Lawrence
on is correct; in the same vein, other licenses (the OPL, for example) have optional clauses that, when not invoked, pass the DFSG. Chris -- Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.lordsutch.com/chris/ Computer Systems Manager, Physics and Astronomy, Univ. of Mississippi 125B Lewis Hall - 662-915-5765

Re: PROPOSED: interpretive guidelines regarding DFSG 3, modifiability, and invariant text

2001-11-28 Thread Chris Lawrence
isc, without opening the door to rafts of other crap anyway without a "if RMS wrote it, it's OK" exception that smacks of hypocrisy. And since I don't see either RMS removing that material or us excising it from our package of emacs over his objections, the only way forw

Re: OpenOffice and Java

2001-10-22 Thread Chris Lawrence
t Java on the system, at least if you use the binaries at openoffice.org. There's no reason why we can't have a separate openoffice-java in contrib for people that want the Java support. Chris -- Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.lordsutch.com/chris/ Instructor and

Re: DFSG status of DFARS clause?

2001-10-14 Thread Chris Lawrence
Osama bin Laden have to abide by the terms of the GPL with regards to the software, would that be non-free, even though both groups are covered by DFSG-free licenses?) Chris -- Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.lordsutch.com/chris/

Re: Amicus Brief in DVD CCA v. Bunner, et al.

2001-10-11 Thread Chris Lawrence
than the overall jurisdictional argument which at best is specious. Chris (IANAL) -- Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.lordsutch.com/chris/ Instructor and Doctoral Student, Political Science, Univ. of Mississippi 208 Deupree Hall - 662-915-5765 pgpgOdXbvnnsM.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [Steve Lidie ] Re: xodometer licensing

2001-02-25 Thread Chris Lawrence
e have diverged from the FSF > analysis, something that I don't think we do elsewhere. I'll look > through the mailing list archives. May I suggest that we get this author to adopt the Clarified Artistic License, which everyone agrees IS free and furthermore is GPL-compatible.

Re: Bug#82116: README.why-python2 does not accurately describe licensing issues

2001-01-13 Thread Chris Lawrence
On Jan 13, Gregor Hoffleit wrote: > thanks for the feedback! You're welcome :) > On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 12:34:13PM -0600, Chris Lawrence wrote: > > I would add at least a pointer to the Python community's response to > > this issue, > > Which was like what ?

Re: "Clarified" Artistic License

2000-12-09 Thread Chris Lawrence
On Dec 09, Joseph Carter wrote: > On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 01:00:10PM -0600, Chris Lawrence wrote: > > ncftp 3.0.2 comes under something called the "Clarified" Artistic > > License. It looks DFSG-free, but I'm not certain. Here's the text: > [..] > &

"Clarified" Artistic License

2000-12-09 Thread Chris Lawrence
bution of this Package. 9. The name of the Copyright Holder may not be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific prior written permission. 10. THIS PACKAGE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND WITHOUT ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITA

Re: QT Designer _NOT_ under QPL.

2000-08-11 Thread Chris Lawrence
On Aug 11, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > This was on the kde-licensing mailing list two days ago. > Just FYI. [snip] Well, I guess we know where Troll came up with their name... Chris, who wonders if we ignore Troll maybe they will just go away... ;-)

Re: Bug#68652 acknowledged by developer (dosemu has clickwrap license)

2000-08-06 Thread Chris Lawrence
ey don't specifically ask that you accept the license, but that's a moot point.) Chris -- ===== | Chris Lawrence | Your source for almost nothing of value: | | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |

Re: Bug#68652 acknowledged by developer (dosemu has clickwrap license)

2000-08-06 Thread Chris Lawrence
ey don't specifically ask that you accept the license, but that's a moot point.) Chris -- ===== | Chris Lawrence | Your source for almost nothing of value: | | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |

Re: Licensing Problems with Debian Packages (Was Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation)

2000-02-18 Thread Chris Lawrence
n't find something more constructive. We're tired of your bullshit and your inability to assimilate new ideas (for example, that you're wrong). Chris -- Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Senior Research Assistant, SSRL Opinions and attitudes expressed herein are rarely shared by my employer.

Re: Licensing Problems with Debian Packages (Was Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation)

2000-02-17 Thread Chris Lawrence
ibuting only places the combined work (grep+libc) under the GPL, not its constituent parts for ever and in eternity). I think you're trolling now... Chris -- ===== |Chris Lawrence | You have a co

Re: On interpreting licences (was: KDE not in Debian?)

2000-02-10 Thread Chris Lawrence
t have the same rights as those provided by the GPL. Whether or not the actual components are licensed under the GPL is irrelevant. What is relevant is that no permissions granted by the GPL are abridged by any of the components. The (regex) Qt. licenses abridge those permissions (in the case of the QPL, ever so slightly. Same deal with the BSD Advertising Clause). C

Re: Copyright lawyers analysis of Andreas Pour's Interpretation

2000-02-10 Thread Chris Lawrence
were not the case, then Sun, HP, et al. could not bundle a proprietary X implementation (including closed-source X servers) with their operating systems. Chris -- ===== | Chris Lawrence | You have a computer. Do yo

Re: Compuclick Ltda - Debian Vendor Page

2000-02-10 Thread Chris Lawrence
;s just a statement about the fact they make CDs.) So I guess the person to blame works for Compaq. Chris -- = |Chris Lawrence | Get rid of Roger Wicker this year!| | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>| http://www.lo

Re: Why Debian's webpages aren't DFGS-free ?

2000-02-02 Thread Chris Lawrence
icense than the SPI copyright. As a matter of fact, there can't be a problem, because the web site hosts documents under the GPL and other licenses. Chris -- ===== |Chris Lawrence| The

Re: KDE not in Debian?

2000-02-01 Thread Chris Lawrence
programs have gotten the same treatment (as have Qt-based programs from people other than KDE). Chris -- = |Chris Lawrence | Get rid of Roger Wicker this year!| | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>| http://www.lordsutch.com/ms-one/ | |

Re: Double Standard?

2000-02-01 Thread Chris Lawrence
's possible other packages include Qt code). Chris -- ===== |Chris Lawrence| Get Debian GNU/Linux CDROMs| | <[EMAIL P

Re: KDE not in Debian?

2000-01-31 Thread Chris Lawrence
atters is the license. And the license says we can't link KDE apps against Qt (1 or 2). Chris -- = |Chris Lawrence|

Re: Was Re: KDE not in Debian?

2000-01-30 Thread Chris Lawrence
missing the reason why it's so hard to get people to explicitly say "you can link this against Qt"; that apparently would satisfy the FTP maintainers and let KDE 1 into contrib [and KDE 2 into main]). Chris -- ==

Re: Was Re: KDE not in Debian?

2000-01-30 Thread Chris Lawrence
ke that of GV won't consider linking against Qt an abuse, and there are plenty of fat targets out there for a lawsuit (Corel, Red Hat, Caldera...).] Chris -- ===== | Chris Lawrence | Your source f

Re: Bug#56166: base-files: copyright in motd is outdated (fwd)

2000-01-26 Thread Chris Lawrence
ltiply. The Python license makes the same basic point, but you have to fiddle with the wording some if you're not CWI ;-) Chris -- = |

Re: Bug#56166: base-files: copyright in motd is outdated (fwd)

2000-01-25 Thread Chris Lawrence
as a whole. Chris -- ===== | Chris Lawrence| The Linux/m68k FAQ | | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.linux-m68k.org/faq/faq.html | | || | Open Director

Re: freedomization task list [was: Re: Dangerous precedent being

1999-12-13 Thread Chris Lawrence
GPLed code... it wouldn't revert to the public domain, which is the only "benefit" that an overturned GPL might have to proprietary software companies!). Chris -- = |Chris Lawrence| Get

Re: Bruce Perens's Slashdot debacle

1999-12-03 Thread Chris Lawrence
On Dec 04, Frank Copeland wrote: > Chris Lawrence wrote: > >On Dec 03, Frank Copeland wrote: > >> Robert Merkel wrote: > >> > > Like it or not, debian is an open project. > >> > > >> >In the conventional media, if the news doesn't c

Re: Bruce Perens's Slashdot debacle

1999-12-03 Thread Chris Lawrence
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=99/11/26/1450245&mode=thread Chris -- ===== |Chris Lawrence |Get Debian GNU/Linux CDROMs| | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>| http://www.lordsutch.com/cds/ | | |

Re: Free Download End User License Agreement

1999-12-03 Thread Chris Lawrence
On Dec 02, Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote: > On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 03:13:14AM -0600, Chris Lawrence wrote: > > On Dec 02, Anthony Towns wrote: > > > > They seem to be put off by liability issues, etc. > > > > > > And no doubt the risk of having their idle c

Re: Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL

1999-12-02 Thread Chris Lawrence
r the GPL, they are only obligated not to make the "you can't sell to minors" restriction viral. It also seems we're venturing into debian-project territory here Chris -- = |Chris Lawren

Re: Free Download End User License Agreement

1999-12-02 Thread Chris Lawrence
ng slashdot headlines. Chris -- ===== |Chris Lawrence| The Linux/m68k FAQ | | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | ht

Re: is this free?

1999-11-23 Thread Chris Lawrence
e. Would be nice if we had one around here ;-) Chris -- ===== |Chris Lawrence | You have a computer. Do you have Linux? | | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |http://www.linux-m68k.org/index.html | | |

Re: mutt no longer in non-us?

1999-11-19 Thread Chris Lawrence
(OK, so I didn't account for a few little niggling details. That can be fixed...) Chris -- ===== | Chris Lawrence | Your source for almost nothing of value: | | &l

Re: mutt no longer in non-us?

1999-11-15 Thread Chris Lawrence
rtega AK-47 Uzi $400 million in gold bullion Rule Psix Nazi militia Project Monarch counter-intelligence JFK cypherpunk Kibo Ron Brown clones -- ===== | Chris Lawrence|Visit my hom

Re: Corel's apt frontend

1999-10-31 Thread Chris Lawrence
;t give a rat's ass who calls their program, and apt is the program that runs dpkg.) Chris -- = |Chris Lawrence |Get

Re: Bug#47845: libdbd-pg-perl nonfree?

1999-10-20 Thread Chris Lawrence
On Oct 20, Brian Ristuccia wrote: > On Tue, Oct 19, 1999 at 11:24:40PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote: > > On Oct 20, Brian Ristuccia wrote: > > > COPYRIGHT > > >The DBD::Pg module is free software. You may distribute > > >under the terms of e

Re: Bug#47845: libdbd-pg-perl nonfree?

1999-10-20 Thread Chris Lawrence
ndency on a non-free package (which would make it appropriate for contrib). CHris -- ===== |Chris Lawrence |Get Debian GNU/Linux CDROMs| | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>|

Re: opencontent licence DFSG free?

1999-10-18 Thread Chris Lawrence
the "release" OPL at the Open Content website. The book is licensed under ANY version of the OPL, and the latest versions are a lot less strict in terms of attribution and limiting the freedom of derived works.) Chris -- ==

Re: opencontent licence DFSG free?

1999-10-12 Thread Chris Lawrence
re, I think RMS helped them write it or revise it. Chris -- ===== |Chris Lawrence |Get Debian GNU/Linux CDROMs| | <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: license question

1999-10-05 Thread Chris Lawrence
eems acceptable, although most of the disclosure terms seem rather heavy-handed ("Hi, I'll run some stats for you, but first let me lecture you on the license of the program I'm using..."). IANAL. #include * batteries not included. Chris -- ====

Re: NcFTP is free again?

1999-10-01 Thread Chris Lawrence
ping on this point) there is no license that I can see. So we can't do squat with NcFTP 3 until Mike includes a license. Incidentally, ncftp 2 core dumps after using ncftp 3 (the prefs files apparently confuse it); maybe we should fix that... Chris -- ==

Re: Is the INRIA license non-free?

1999-09-22 Thread Chris Lawrence
at we can parse (poorly in my case, but I'm sure we've got a native French speaker around somewhere). IANAL. IMHO. Yadda yadda yadda. Chris -- ===== | Chris Lawrence | Get your

[from -devel] Re: all rights reserved

1999-09-09 Thread Chris Lawrence
ove XXX's name, so it is DFSG-compliant. I think. [CC'd to debian-legal for their opinions] Chris -- = |Chris Lawrence| The Linu

Re: License ok? Opinion needed.

1999-07-31 Thread Chris Lawrence
n licenses, as it simply restates existing law (and is unenforceable outside the U.S.) rather than imposing additional restrictions on the user. Chris -- ===== | Chris Lawrence | Get your D

Re: Is it illegal to distribute Linux kernel? KDE precedent.

1999-06-25 Thread Chris Lawrence
p just happens to be in the kernel tree). (I return you to your regularly-scheduled trollfest.) Chris -- ===== |Chris Lawrence| Visit my home page!| | <[EMA

Re: Is it illegal to distribute Linux kernel? KDE precedent.

1999-06-25 Thread Chris Lawrence
they do is define an interface, which to my understanding isn't "code" per se. I doubt Linus would have allowed them in otherwise. Chris --

Re: DFSG And Trademarks

1999-06-18 Thread Chris Lawrence
On Jun 18, Jeff Licquia wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 1999 at 02:35:02PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Change the name on your package just enough to avoid all of the trademarks, > > because we _will_ have to fix bugs before they do, etc. > > Any recommendations on avoiding the trademark? Do I h

Re: DFSG And Trademarks

1999-06-18 Thread Chris Lawrence
an build an identical CD image to the Official (Debian) CD, but I'm wouldn't be allowed to call it the Official CD. So even within Debian there are issues. Chris -- ==

Re: Editor and sensible-editor

1999-06-15 Thread Chris Lawrence
uot;UW Pine" or "UW PC/Pine"). That would at least edge it closer to DFSG-freeness (and would certainly let binaries into non-free). Chris -- ===== |Chris Lawrence| Visit

Re: [awansink@ke.com.au: Re: Isn't a kde version of abiword illegal?]

1999-05-29 Thread Chris Lawrence
raries. ... which may have their own issues. Is the LGPL (AbiWord uses glib internally) Qt-compatible? Chris -- ===== | Chris Lawrence | You have a computer. Do you have Linux? | | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [awansink@ke.com.au: Re: Isn't a kde version of abiword illegal?]

1999-05-28 Thread Chris Lawrence
Chris -- = | Chris Lawrence |Get your Debian 2.1 CD-ROMs| | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>| http://www.lordsutch.com/ | | | | |Amiga A4000 604e/233Mhz|This addr

Grail 0.6 license: DFSG-free? (and intent to adopt)

1999-04-04 Thread Chris Lawrence
ng to move the package out of project/orphaned and into main; I might also be willing to maintain it if it's non-free (if it doesn't seem like a complete hassle). Chris -- = | Chris Lawrence | You