On Mar 10, C.M. Connelly wrote: > There are about 30 documents (and the stuff they document) whose > licensing status is less clear, and those are the ones that I have > some questions on. I have included some example > copyright/distribution statements based on those in this > ``unknown'' category, and I would appreciate a quick take from > debian-legal habitues on whether they are DFSG-free, and, in > particular, whether we can continue to distribute files with > copyright/distribution statements similar to the examples.
To the best of my knowledge, none of the attached licenses are DFSG-free, with the possible exception of the guy who goes on about "GNU-style" stuff (who needs to properly license the file). The one that's written in French I can't be certain of, but I suspect it's not DFSG-free either. Chris -- Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.lordsutch.com/chris/
