here is the scenario.
subnet 1
192.168.1.x
contains a gateway 192.168.1.1 (with dual network interface) connected to
the internet and a number of clients
subnet 2
192.168.0.x
contains a gateway 192.168.0.1 (with dual network interface) connected to
the internet and a number of clients
a friend a
Dude - your ISP is being an arsehole...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP error from remote mailer after MAIL
FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:host kcmx01.mgw.rr.com
[24.94.163.190]: 550 5.7.1 Mail Refused - 202.0.42 - See
http://security.rr.com/mail_blocks.htm#security - 20030323
IIRC, you're not supposed to use a 192.168.0.x subnet. Something about
the network address part being screwed up. Try using 192.168.1.x and
192.168.2.x for your two subnets. Of course, you could always split
192.168.1.x into two (or more) different subnets too.
Mind you, the part o
Obelix./.MobiliX: Highest German Civil Court Dismissed the Case
The trademark case Obelix versus MobiliX - Linux On Mobile Computers was
finally dismissed by the Bundesgerichtshof - BGH, the highest German civil
court. Werner Heuser, owner of the trademark MobiliX and the domain
mobilix.org - UniX
Am Don, 04 Sep 2003, schrieb Werner Heuser:
> mobilix.org - UniX On Mobile Computers, has lost the case, because the BGH
> rejected his request for an appeal. The BGH did not care to provide a
> detailed argumentation for their decision, the chamber merely quoted the
Herzliches Beileid,
greeting
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 08:03:07PM +0200, Oyvind Albrigtsen wrote:
> hi
>
> i just got my toshiba tecra s1, and it's got a ati mobility radeon 9000
> display adapter.
>
> i cant get it to work. i've been searching the net for information on
> how to make it work, but havent found anything that wo
I have a Dell I8200 with this same chip, and it works beautifully for me
here's what you need to do:
1) Use X 4.3 (Daniel Stones from penguinppc.org)
2) Install the xlibmesa4-drm-src package (also found in Daniel Stones
repository)
3) Recompile your kernel and include the xlibmesa4-drm modul
Hi all!
I've managed to get my ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 to work great under X
finally - after a good deal of tweaking, of course. the 2.4.22 radeonfb
driver likes my card, the ati driver from X 4.3.0 works - I installed of
course the radeon DRM driver (radeon-20030901-linux.i386.tar -- DRI
project
Hello,
I'm trying to configure my wireless NIC using /etc/network/interfaces and have
a couple of questions.
I've added the wireless stanzas to the interfaces file with the
"wireless_essid" and "wireless_key" options to set my ESSID and encryption key.
I get the following errors on boot:
Er
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 10:44:24AM -0400, Jordan Lederman wrote:
> I have a Dell I8200 with this same chip, and it works beautifully for me
> here's what you need to do:
>
> 1) Use X 4.3 (Daniel Stones from penguinppc.org)
> 2) Install the xlibmesa4-drm-src package (also found in Daniel Stone
Yes, X will run on this chipset w/o 3D using either the driver 'nv' or 'vesa'
(not sure which one). It should also work nicely in 2D with the nvidia driver
(the older one that doesn't know about the M9 chipset). I've attached my
working XF86Config in the hopes that it will help you.
On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 22:59:00 +1200, criggie wrote:
> Dude - your ISP is being an arsehole...
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> SMTP error from remote mailer after MAIL
> FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:host kcmx01.mgw.rr.com
> [24.94.163.190]: 550 5.7.1 Mail Refused - 202.0.42 - See
> http://security.rr
On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 08:52:57 -0400, David Woyciesjes wrote:
> IIRC, you're not supposed to use a 192.168.0.x subnet. Something about
> the network address part being screwed up. Try using 192.168.1.x and
> 192.168.2.x for your two subnets. Of course, you could always split
> 192.168.1.x into
Praveen Kallakuri wrote:
>
> On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 08:52:57 -0400, David Woyciesjes wrote:
>
> > IIRC, you're not supposed to use a 192.168.0.x subnet. Something about
> > the network address part being screwed up. Try using 192.168.1.x and
> > 192.168.2.x for your two subnets. Of course, you
I'm not the expert, but let me ask you did you compile AGP modul in your
kernel? Another thing, my understanding is that radeonfb doesn't have to do
anything with X, it just provides graphics for the console. For 3-d
acceleration you need to compile ATI Radeon driver under Character Devices ->
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 01:41:00PM -0400, David Woyciesjes wrote:
>
> Something to do with the network address. But now that I think about
> it, I may be confusing it with the rules for creating a custom subnet.
In deed, you can't use a subnetwork with all zero's or ones.
--
Rudy Gevaer
David Woyciesjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Praveen Kallakuri wrote:
>
>> secondly, how can i split 1.x into different subnets?
>
> I'll have to look it up, but it involves using a subnet mask like
> 255.255.224.0 instead of the usual 255.255.255.0. This way you can have
> a subnet with s
David Z Maze wrote:
>
> David Woyciesjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Praveen Kallakuri wrote:
> >
> >> secondly, how can i split 1.x into different subnets?
> >
> > I'll have to look it up, but it involves using a subnet mask like
> > 255.255.224.0 instead of the usual 255.255.255.0.
On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 12:09:29 -0500
"Praveen Kallakuri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 08:52:57 -0400, David Woyciesjes wrote:
> > IIRC, you're not supposed to use a 192.168.0.x subnet. Something
> > about the network address part being screwed up. Try using
> > 192.16
The big difference is that 192.168.0.0/24 is not subnetted (well, kinda)
192.168.0.0/16 is 256 networks of 254 users. at least by RFC just as
176.16.0.0/12 and 10.0.0.0/8 are 16 networks of 2**16-2 users and 1
network of 2**24-2 users.
Jason
PS, David, cram hard for that CCNA, only about 75%
criggie wrote:
>
>
> BTW the answer would be to subnet, to use 0-127 on one side and 128-255
> on the other side, with a netmask of 255.255.255.127
>
> --
Actually, that subnet mask would be 255.255.255.128. (In binary -
.1000)
Subnetwork 1:
Network address - 192.168.1.0
Broadcas
Jason Straw wrote:
>
> The big difference is that 192.168.0.0/24 is not subnetted (well, kinda)
>
> 192.168.0.0/16 is 256 networks of 254 users. at least by RFC just as
> 176.16.0.0/12 and 10.0.0.0/8 are 16 networks of 2**16-2 users and 1
> network of 2**24-2 users.
>
> Jason
I'm sure
I just realized I should make a clarification... according to newer
standards, the setup below to create two subnets would work.
But, according to some older standards, to create two usable subnets
from 192.168.1.x, you would have to use 255.255.255.192 as the subnet
mask, and you w
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 10:58, Jordan Lederman wrote:
> I just replied to someone else about the radeon M9, see if what I wrote helps
> you, and if not, drop me a line.
> --jordan
Well, I wasn't using the 3d accelerated 'radeon' driver but the merely
2d 'ati' driver - but switching do
If I were in your shoes, i'd try copimliy agpgart as a module and then you can
modprobe with the agp_try_unsupported=1 paramater. I've never had good luck
getting the framebuffer working correctly, so I compile w/o fb support. Also,
I do remember running into a bug that if I booted into a highe
My apologies for the last post, I hit 'send' too quickly and it doesn't make
much sense
If I were in your shoes, I'd try to compile agpgart as a module and then you
can modprobe with the agp_try_unsupported=1 parameter. Also, I've never had
good luck getting the framebuffer working correc
"Keith" == Keith Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Keith> I'm using kernel modules for my wireless card and I've
Keith> added them into /etc/modules so that they are loaded prior
Keith> to the /etc/init.d/networking script running. Why am I
Keith> getting these errors? Once th
An e-mail you sent with message-id NOQUEUE
was modified by our mail scanning software.
The recipients were: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Here are the details of the modification:
Virus W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] found in mail
I have a slightly different situation, at home my machine has a fixed
static address in my local network. But at school it uses dhcp. Both
places use wired ethernet so I only deal with 1 eth0 here. So is there
a way / or tool that can help me do this task
Ask where am I : if (home) {set e
"ThanhVu" == ThanhVu Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ThanhVu> I have a slightly different situation, at home my machine
ThanhVu> has a fixed static address in my local network. But at
ThanhVu> school it uses dhcp. Both places use wired ethernet so I
ThanhVu> only deal with
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 17:54, Aaron Van Couwenberghe wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I've managed to get my ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 to work great under X
> finally - after a good deal of tweaking, of course. the 2.4.22 radeonfb
> driver likes my card, the ati driver from X 4.3.0 works - I installed of
> cour
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 17:54, Aaron Van Couwenberghe wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I've managed to get my ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 to work great under X
> finally - after a good deal of tweaking, of course. the 2.4.22 radeonfb
> driver likes my card, the ati driver from X 4.3.0 works - I installed of
> cour
You could just setup DHCP on your home network, having it distribute
static IP addresses, maybe based upon MAC addresses.
Luke
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, ThanhVu Nguyen wrote:
> I have a slightly different situation, at home my machine has a fixed
> static address in my local network. But at school i
here is the scenario.
subnet 1
192.168.1.x
contains a gateway 192.168.1.1 (with dual network interface) connected to
the internet and a number of clients
subnet 2
192.168.0.x
contains a gateway 192.168.0.1 (with dual network interface) connected to
the internet and a number of clients
a friend a
Dude - your ISP is being an arsehole...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP error from remote mailer after MAIL
FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:host kcmx01.mgw.rr.com
[24.94.163.190]: 550 5.7.1 Mail Refused - 202.0.42 - See
http://security.rr.com/mail_blocks.htm#security - 20030323
IIRC, you're not supposed to use a 192.168.0.x subnet. Something about
the network address part being screwed up. Try using 192.168.1.x and
192.168.2.x for your two subnets. Of course, you could always split
192.168.1.x into two (or more) different subnets too.
Mind you, the part o
Obelix./.MobiliX: Highest German Civil Court Dismissed the Case
The trademark case Obelix versus MobiliX - Linux On Mobile Computers was
finally dismissed by the Bundesgerichtshof - BGH, the highest German civil
court. Werner Heuser, owner of the trademark MobiliX and the domain
mobilix.org - UniX
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am Don, 04 Sep 2003, schrieb Werner Heuser:
> mobilix.org - UniX On Mobile Computers, has lost the case, because the BGH
> rejected his request for an appeal. The BGH did not care to provide a
> detailed argumentation for their decision, the chamber merely quoted the
Herzliches Beileid,
greeting
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 08:03:07PM +0200, Oyvind Albrigtsen wrote:
> hi
>
> i just got my toshiba tecra s1, and it's got a ati mobility radeon 9000
> display adapter.
>
> i cant get it to work. i've been searching the net for information on
> how to make it work, but havent found anything that wo
I have a Dell I8200 with this same chip, and it works beautifully for me
here's what you need to do:
1) Use X 4.3 (Daniel Stones from penguinppc.org)
2) Install the xlibmesa4-drm-src package (also found in Daniel Stones
repository)
3) Recompile your kernel and include the xlibmesa4-drm modul
Hi all!
I've managed to get my ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 to work great under X
finally - after a good deal of tweaking, of course. the 2.4.22 radeonfb
driver likes my card, the ati driver from X 4.3.0 works - I installed of
course the radeon DRM driver (radeon-20030901-linux.i386.tar -- DRI
project
Hello,
I'm trying to configure my wireless NIC using /etc/network/interfaces and have a
couple of questions.
I've added the wireless stanzas to the interfaces file with the "wireless_essid" and
"wireless_key" options to set my ESSID and encryption key. I get the following errors
on boot:
Er
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 10:44:24AM -0400, Jordan Lederman wrote:
> I have a Dell I8200 with this same chip, and it works beautifully for me
> here's what you need to do:
>
> 1) Use X 4.3 (Daniel Stones from penguinppc.org)
> 2) Install the xlibmesa4-drm-src package (also found in Daniel Stone
Yes, X will run on this chipset w/o 3D using either the driver 'nv' or 'vesa'
(not sure which one). It should also work nicely in 2D with the nvidia driver
(the older one that doesn't know about the M9 chipset). I've attached my
working XF86Config in the hopes that it will help you.
On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 22:59:00 +1200, criggie wrote:
> Dude - your ISP is being an arsehole...
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> SMTP error from remote mailer after MAIL
> FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:host kcmx01.mgw.rr.com
> [24.94.163.190]: 550 5.7.1 Mail Refused - 202.0.42 - See
> http://security.rr
On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 08:52:57 -0400, David Woyciesjes wrote:
> IIRC, you're not supposed to use a 192.168.0.x subnet. Something about
> the network address part being screwed up. Try using 192.168.1.x and
> 192.168.2.x for your two subnets. Of course, you could always split
> 192.168.1.x into
Praveen Kallakuri wrote:
>
> On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 08:52:57 -0400, David Woyciesjes wrote:
>
> > IIRC, you're not supposed to use a 192.168.0.x subnet. Something about
> > the network address part being screwed up. Try using 192.168.1.x and
> > 192.168.2.x for your two subnets. Of course, you
I'm not the expert, but let me ask you did you compile AGP modul in your
kernel? Another thing, my understanding is that radeonfb doesn't have to do
anything with X, it just provides graphics for the console. For 3-d
acceleration you need to compile ATI Radeon driver under Character Devices ->
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 01:41:00PM -0400, David Woyciesjes wrote:
>
> Something to do with the network address. But now that I think about
> it, I may be confusing it with the rules for creating a custom subnet.
In deed, you can't use a subnetwork with all zero's or ones.
--
Rudy Gevaer
David Woyciesjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Praveen Kallakuri wrote:
>
>> secondly, how can i split 1.x into different subnets?
>
> I'll have to look it up, but it involves using a subnet mask like
> 255.255.224.0 instead of the usual 255.255.255.0. This way you can have
> a subnet with s
David Z Maze wrote:
>
> David Woyciesjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Praveen Kallakuri wrote:
> >
> >> secondly, how can i split 1.x into different subnets?
> >
> > I'll have to look it up, but it involves using a subnet mask like
> > 255.255.224.0 instead of the usual 255.255.255.0.
On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 12:09:29 -0500
"Praveen Kallakuri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 08:52:57 -0400, David Woyciesjes wrote:
> > IIRC, you're not supposed to use a 192.168.0.x subnet. Something
> > about the network address part being screwed up. Try using
> > 192.16
The big difference is that 192.168.0.0/24 is not subnetted (well, kinda)
192.168.0.0/16 is 256 networks of 254 users. at least by RFC just as
176.16.0.0/12 and 10.0.0.0/8 are 16 networks of 2**16-2 users and 1
network of 2**24-2 users.
Jason
PS, David, cram hard for that CCNA, only about 75%
criggie wrote:
>
>
> BTW the answer would be to subnet, to use 0-127 on one side and 128-255
> on the other side, with a netmask of 255.255.255.127
>
> --
Actually, that subnet mask would be 255.255.255.128. (In binary -
.1000)
Subnetwork 1:
Network address - 192.168.1.0
Broadcas
Jason Straw wrote:
>
> The big difference is that 192.168.0.0/24 is not subnetted (well, kinda)
>
> 192.168.0.0/16 is 256 networks of 254 users. at least by RFC just as
> 176.16.0.0/12 and 10.0.0.0/8 are 16 networks of 2**16-2 users and 1
> network of 2**24-2 users.
>
> Jason
I'm sure
I just realized I should make a clarification... according to newer
standards, the setup below to create two subnets would work.
But, according to some older standards, to create two usable subnets
from 192.168.1.x, you would have to use 255.255.255.192 as the subnet
mask, and you w
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 10:58, Jordan Lederman wrote:
> I just replied to someone else about the radeon M9, see if what I wrote helps
> you, and if not, drop me a line.
> --jordan
Well, I wasn't using the 3d accelerated 'radeon' driver but the merely
2d 'ati' driver - but switching do
If I were in your shoes, i'd try copimliy agpgart as a module and then you can
modprobe with the agp_try_unsupported=1 paramater. I've never had good luck
getting the framebuffer working correctly, so I compile w/o fb support. Also,
I do remember running into a bug that if I booted into a highe
My apologies for the last post, I hit 'send' too quickly and it doesn't make
much sense
If I were in your shoes, I'd try to compile agpgart as a module and then you
can modprobe with the agp_try_unsupported=1 parameter. Also, I've never had
good luck getting the framebuffer working correc
"Keith" == Keith Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Keith> I'm using kernel modules for my wireless card and I've
Keith> added them into /etc/modules so that they are loaded prior
Keith> to the /etc/init.d/networking script running. Why am I
Keith> getting these errors? Once th
An e-mail you sent with message-id NOQUEUE
was modified by our mail scanning software.
The recipients were: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Here are the details of the modification:
Virus W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] found in mail
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
I have a slightly different situation, at home my machine has a fixed
static address in my local network. But at school it uses dhcp. Both
places use wired ethernet so I only deal with 1 eth0 here. So is there
a way / or tool that can help me do this task
Ask where am I : if (home) {set e
"ThanhVu" == ThanhVu Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ThanhVu> I have a slightly different situation, at home my machine
ThanhVu> has a fixed static address in my local network. But at
ThanhVu> school it uses dhcp. Both places use wired ethernet so I
ThanhVu> only deal with
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 17:54, Aaron Van Couwenberghe wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I've managed to get my ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 to work great under X
> finally - after a good deal of tweaking, of course. the 2.4.22 radeonfb
> driver likes my card, the ati driver from X 4.3.0 works - I installed of
> cour
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 17:54, Aaron Van Couwenberghe wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I've managed to get my ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 to work great under X
> finally - after a good deal of tweaking, of course. the 2.4.22 radeonfb
> driver likes my card, the ati driver from X 4.3.0 works - I installed of
> cour
You could just setup DHCP on your home network, having it distribute
static IP addresses, maybe based upon MAC addresses.
Luke
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, ThanhVu Nguyen wrote:
> I have a slightly different situation, at home my machine has a fixed
> static address in my local network. But at school i
68 matches
Mail list logo
