On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 10:58, Jordan Lederman wrote: > I just replied to someone else about the radeon M9, see if what I wrote helps > you, and if not, drop me a line. > --jordan Well, I wasn't using the 3d accelerated 'radeon' driver but the merely 2d 'ati' driver - but switching doesn't seem to have helped.
I tried with the latest DRI CVS snap, and with daniel's source package. Coincidentally his source tree is too old for the radeon driver to even load :P (need 1.9 or >). So I'm using, radeon-20030901-linux.i386.tar. Now, my framebuffer resizes correctly when i leave X (one good thing at least!) but I get the following output from the radeon driver: (II) RADEON(0): Direct rendering enabled (==) RandR enabled (II) Initializing built-in extension MIT-SHM (II) Initializing built-in extension XInputExtension (II) Initializing built-in extension XTEST (II) Initializing built-in extension XKEYBOARD (II) Initializing built-in extension LBX (II) Initializing built-in extension XC-APPGROUP (II) Initializing built-in extension SECURITY (II) Initializing built-in extension XINERAMA (II) Initializing built-in extension XFree86-Bigfont (II) Initializing built-in extension RENDER (II) Initializing built-in extension RANDR (EE) RADEON(0): FBIOPAN_DISPLAY: Invalid argument Oops. X says Direct rendering enabled. But then I get an error, and glxinfo says: direct rendering: No lspci says: 00:01.0 PCI bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 5591/5592 AGP 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown device 4c66 (rev 01) (vga chipset is LF according to X) so where I'm going now is that Linux 2.4.22 has no AGP support for the 5591/5592 agp2x chipsets yet, but I am almost certain you can still get accel even without specific chipset support. If the whole server log would be useful I'd be happy to send it privately but I think I've spammed the list enough for one day. --aaron -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
