On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Lee Bradshaw wrote:
> I got the impression that the exit 1 would prevent the suspend from
> happening if the kernel had the correct apm support. That's the only
> reason I can see for not calling the scripts to suspend linux
> properly.
>
> I'm not sure if this is my bad inte
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 01:41:33AM +0100, Vivek Dasmohapatra wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Lee Bradshaw wrote:
>> I'm inclined to think the current scripts are buggy. Locking the
>> machine is not good.
>
> I agree - the ac_power check should be delegated to the scripts in the
> event.d directory
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Lee Bradshaw wrote:
> I got the impression that the exit 1 would prevent the suspend from
> happening if the kernel had the correct apm support. That's the only
> reason I can see for not calling the scripts to suspend linux
> properly.
>
> I'm not sure if this is my bad int
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 01:41:33AM +0100, Vivek Dasmohapatra wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Lee Bradshaw wrote:
>> I'm inclined to think the current scripts are buggy. Locking the
>> machine is not good.
>
> I agree - the ac_power check should be delegated to the scripts in the
> event.d directory
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Douglas Bridges wrote:
> I had noticed that problem myself when trying to suspend my A20m. Where do
> you fix the problem (I am pretty new to debian, been a long time mdk user)?
I now believe, based on the mail from Tino Keitel on this list, that it
may be a kernel issue: may
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Douglas Bridges wrote:
> I had noticed that problem myself when trying to suspend my A20m. Where do
> you fix the problem (I am pretty new to debian, been a long time mdk user)?
I now believe, based on the mail from Tino Keitel on this list, that it
may be a kernel issue: ma
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Lee Bradshaw wrote:
> Your message reminded me of a similar problem. My dell cpx500 has
That's me - always reminding people of problems :)
> I'm inclined to think the current scripts are buggy. Locking the
> machine is not good.
I agree - the ac_power check should be delega
Your message reminded me of a similar problem. My dell cpx500 has
options to suspend when closing the laptop on battery or on ac power.
Suspend when closing on battery was working fine, but suspend when
closing on ac power caused the machine to lock up so I had disabled it
in the BIOS. After seeing
Hi - just a heads up:
I upgraded to woody recently, and discovered a quirk in the apmd_proxy
script: It short circuits and ignores system suspend events when
on_ac_power returns true: This has the unfortunate effect of not
shutting down the alsa-sound stuff and misc other things, which
unfortuna
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Lee Bradshaw wrote:
> Your message reminded me of a similar problem. My dell cpx500 has
That's me - always reminding people of problems :)
> I'm inclined to think the current scripts are buggy. Locking the
> machine is not good.
I agree - the ac_power check should be deleg
Your message reminded me of a similar problem. My dell cpx500 has
options to suspend when closing the laptop on battery or on ac power.
Suspend when closing on battery was working fine, but suspend when
closing on ac power caused the machine to lock up so I had disabled it
in the BIOS. After seein
Hi - just a heads up:
I upgraded to woody recently, and discovered a quirk in the apmd_proxy
script: It short circuits and ignores system suspend events when
on_ac_power returns true: This has the unfortunate effect of not
shutting down the alsa-sound stuff and misc other things, which
unfortun
12 matches
Mail list logo
