On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 11:57:35AM -0800, Mike Mestnik
wrote:
> > Normally you should also be able to set up so that the
> > laptop goes automatically to sleep when running out of
> > power. With this setting, the only way to actually kill
> > the computer is to let the battery run out, then let th
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 11:57:35AM -0800, Mike Mestnik
wrote:
> > Normally you should also be able to set up so that the
> > laptop goes automatically to sleep when running out of
> > power. With this setting, the only way to actually kill
> > the computer is to let the battery run out, then let th
Hi,
On Tuesday 06 January 2004 12:07, Yves Rutschle wrote:
> Normally you should also be able to set up so that the
> laptop goes automatically to sleep when running out of
> power. With this setting, the only way to actually kill the
> computer is to let the battery run out, then let the laptop
>
--- Yves Rutschle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 10:40:08PM +1300, Andrew McMillan wrote:
> > If you are running low on battery you get plenty of warning to shut
> > down, and you _certainly_ are a lot more resilient to the "toddler yanks
> > plug" problem that my youngest is
Hi,
On Tuesday 06 January 2004 12:07, Yves Rutschle wrote:
> Normally you should also be able to set up so that the
> laptop goes automatically to sleep when running out of
> power. With this setting, the only way to actually kill the
> computer is to let the battery run out, then let the laptop
>
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 11:07:35AM +, Yves Rutschle wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 10:40:08PM +1300, Andrew McMillan wrote:
> > If you are running low on battery you get plenty of warning to shut
> > down, and you _certainly_ are a lot more resilient to the "toddler yanks
> > plug" problem th
--- Yves Rutschle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 10:40:08PM +1300, Andrew McMillan wrote:
> > If you are running low on battery you get plenty of warning to shut
> > down, and you _certainly_ are a lot more resilient to the "toddler yanks
> > plug" problem that my youngest is
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 09:03:54PM -0800, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> I had not yet upgraded to test11.
>
2.6.1-rc2 is already out.
> , s/hdtune/hdparm/g
>
> I think I am using journalling, as it's a laptop it's more likely to suddenly
> loose power. What
> dose thi
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 11:07:35AM +, Yves Rutschle wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 10:40:08PM +1300, Andrew McMillan wrote:
> > If you are running low on battery you get plenty of warning to shut
> > down, and you _certainly_ are a lot more resilient to the "toddler yanks
> > plug" problem th
6.0-test9. The drive makes
> > > a noticeable whine that can be heard across the room. I'd like the noise
> > > to go away, that is more
> > > important than saving battery power for me.
> > >
> > > I'm using noflushd but it has no effect, I a
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 09:03:54PM -0800, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> I had not yet upgraded to test11.
>
2.6.1-rc2 is already out.
> , s/hdtune/hdparm/g
>
> I think I am using journalling, as it's a laptop it's more likely to suddenly loose
> power. What
> dose thi
> > The drive makes
> > > a noticeable whine that can be heard across the room. I'd like the noise to go
> > > away, that is more
> > > important than saving battery power for me.
> > >
> > > I'm using noflushd but it has no effect, I a
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 10:40:08PM +1300, Andrew McMillan wrote:
> If you are running low on battery you get plenty of warning to shut
> down, and you _certainly_ are a lot more resilient to the "toddler yanks
> plug" problem that my youngest is only recently growing out of.
Normally you should al
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 10:40:08PM +1300, Andrew McMillan wrote:
> If you are running low on battery you get plenty of warning to shut
> down, and you _certainly_ are a lot more resilient to the "toddler yanks
> plug" problem that my youngest is only recently growing out of.
Normally you should al
On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 18:03, Mike Mestnik wrote:
>
> I think I am using journalling, as it's a laptop it's more likely to
> suddenly loose power.
What! My laptop comes with a _built-in_ _UPS_ - only _one_ of the guys
in the office with a _desktop_ machine can boast that one, _his_ UPS
only runs
On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 18:03, Mike Mestnik wrote:
>
> I think I am using journalling, as it's a laptop it's more likely to
> suddenly loose power.
What! My laptop comes with a _built-in_ _UPS_ - only _one_ of the guys
in the office with a _desktop_ machine can boast that one, _his_ UPS
only runs
On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> I had not yet upgraded to test11.
>
> , s/hdtune/hdparm/g
>
> I think I am using journalling, as it's a laptop it's more likely to suddenly
> loose power. What
> dose this mean for noflushd? Are there any links or bug re
I had not yet upgraded to test11.
, s/hdtune/hdparm/g
I think I am using journalling, as it's a laptop it's more likely to suddenly
loose power. What
dose this mean for noflushd? Are there any links or bug reports to track?
--- Tim Connors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> I had not yet upgraded to test11.
>
> , s/hdtune/hdparm/g
>
> I think I am using journalling, as it's a laptop it's more likely to suddenly loose
> power. What
> dose this mean for noflushd? Are there any links or bug re
I had not yet upgraded to test11.
, s/hdtune/hdparm/g
I think I am using journalling, as it's a laptop it's more likely to suddenly loose
power. What
dose this mean for noflushd? Are there any links or bug reports to track?
--- Tim Connors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
I'd like the noise
> > to go away, that is more
> > important than saving battery power for me.
> >
> > I'm using noflushd but it has no effect, I also tried hdtune.
> >
>
> Look at the -M option of hdparm:
> -M get/set acoustic management (0-254
I'd like the noise to go
> > away, that is more
> > important than saving battery power for me.
> >
> > I'm using noflushd but it has no effect, I also tried hdtune.
> >
>
> Look at the -M option of hdparm:
> -M get/set acoustic management (0-254
gt; important than saving battery power for me.
>
> I'm using noflushd but it has no effect, I also tried hdtune.
>
Look at the -M option of hdparm:
-M get/set acoustic management (0-254, 128: quiet, 254: fast) (EXPERIMENTAL)
> __
> Do you Yahoo!?
gt; important than saving battery power for me.
> I'm using noflushd but it has no effect, I also tried hdtune.
I`m using SID on my Workstation and Woody on my Laptop, both with
2.6 er Kernel everything worksfine but why do you use 2.6.0-test9?
I'm using the Kernel source from http://ww
gt; important than saving battery power for me.
>
> I'm using noflushd but it has no effect, I also tried hdtune.
>
Look at the -M option of hdparm:
-M get/set acoustic management (0-254, 128: quiet, 254: fast) (EXPERIMENTAL)
> __
> Do you Yahoo!?
I have a dell8900 and I can't seam to get the drive to spin down on
2.6.0-test9. The drive makes
a noticeable whine that can be heard across the room. I'd like the noise to go
away, that is more
important than saving battery power for me.
I'm using noflushd but it has no effec
gt; important than saving battery power for me.
> I'm using noflushd but it has no effect, I also tried hdtune.
I`m using SID on my Workstation and Woody on my Laptop, both with
2.6 er Kernel everything worksfine but why do you use 2.6.0-test9?
I'm using the Kernel source from http://ww
I have a dell8900 and I can't seam to get the drive to spin down on 2.6.0-test9. The
drive makes
a noticeable whine that can be heard across the room. I'd like the noise to go away,
that is more
important than saving battery power for me.
I'm using noflushd but it has no effec
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Gabor FLEISCHER wrote:
> Is there anyone who succeeded with KDE3, noflushd?
I don't run KDE3, but...
> I could set up my system to spin down the disks when I don't run KDE.
> But with KDE it always has some disk usage. I was searching in google, and I
>
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Gabor FLEISCHER wrote:
> Is there anyone who succeeded with KDE3, noflushd?
I don't run KDE3, but...
> I could set up my system to spin down the disks when I don't run KDE.
> But with KDE it always has some disk usage. I was searching in google, and I
>
Gabor FLEISCHER wrote:
Is there anyone who succeeded with KDE3, noflushd?
I could set up my system to spin down the disks when I don't run KDE.
But with KDE it always has some disk usage. I was searching in google, and I
saw other people had the same problem about a year ago, but nobod
Gabor FLEISCHER wrote:
Is there anyone who succeeded with KDE3, noflushd?
I could set up my system to spin down the disks when I don't run KDE.
But with KDE it always has some disk usage. I was searching in google, and I
saw other people had the same problem about a year ago, but nobody ha
Maybe this will help:
Add noatime to the mount options in fstab
for all of the hd* system mounts. This should
prevent updates to inodes whenever something
touches a file (i.e. access time update).
Gabor FLEISCHER wrote:
> Is there anyone who succeeded with KDE3, noflushd?
>
> I could
On Wednesday 02 April 2003 15:38, Gabor FLEISCHER wrote:
> Is there anyone who succeeded with KDE3, noflushd?
>
> I could set up my system to spin down the disks when I don't run KDE.
> But with KDE it always has some disk usage. I was searching in google, and
> I saw other
Maybe this will help:
Add noatime to the mount options in fstab
for all of the hd* system mounts. This should
prevent updates to inodes whenever something
touches a file (i.e. access time update).
Gabor FLEISCHER wrote:
> Is there anyone who succeeded with KDE3, noflushd?
>
> I could
On Wednesday 02 April 2003 15:38, Gabor FLEISCHER wrote:
> Is there anyone who succeeded with KDE3, noflushd?
>
> I could set up my system to spin down the disks when I don't run KDE.
> But with KDE it always has some disk usage. I was searching in google, and
> I saw other
Is there anyone who succeeded with KDE3, noflushd?
I could set up my system to spin down the disks when I don't run KDE.
But with KDE it always has some disk usage. I was searching in google, and I
saw other people had the same problem about a year ago, but nobody had any
answer.
Gavriel
Is there anyone who succeeded with KDE3, noflushd?
I could set up my system to spin down the disks when I don't run KDE.
But with KDE it always has some disk usage. I was searching in google, and I
saw other people had the same problem about a year ago, but nobody had any
answer.
Ga
I am running Woody 3.0 release 1 on a Thinkpad 600e. I have set up the
noflushd default file to not spin down the disk for 5 minutes but it seems
to ignore my commands always spinning down right after a disk write... I am
running a 2.4.18 custom kernel, which was an upgrade from the default
I am running Woody 3.0 release 1 on a Thinkpad 600e. I have set up the
noflushd default file to not spin down the disk for 5 minutes but it seems
to ignore my commands always spinning down right after a disk write... I am
running a 2.4.18 custom kernel, which was an upgrade from the default
On Sun, 2001-12-30 at 19:16, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 01:06:23AM +0100, Dirk Haage wrote:
> > On Wed, 2001-11-21 at 13:38, Nagy Gabor wrote:
> > > Is there any way to have noflushd (ie. the hd stopping) when I have a
> > > journaling filesystem?
&
On Sun, 2001-12-30 at 19:16, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 01:06:23AM +0100, Dirk Haage wrote:
> > On Wed, 2001-11-21 at 13:38, Nagy Gabor wrote:
> > > Is there any way to have noflushd (ie. the hd stopping) when I have a
> > > journaling filesystem?
&
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 01:06:23AM +0100, Dirk Haage wrote:
> On Wed, 2001-11-21 at 13:38, Nagy Gabor wrote:
> > Is there any way to have noflushd (ie. the hd stopping) when I have a
> > journaling filesystem?
> >
> > When I had ext2 it was OK. I read in noflushd manua
On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 08:46:24AM -0500, Derek Broughton wrote:
> On November 21, 2001 07:38 am, Nagy Gabor wrote:
> > Is there any way to have noflushd (ie. the hd stopping) when I have
> > a journaling filesystem?
> >
> > When I had ext2 it was OK. I read i
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 01:06:23AM +0100, Dirk Haage wrote:
> On Wed, 2001-11-21 at 13:38, Nagy Gabor wrote:
> > Is there any way to have noflushd (ie. the hd stopping) when I have a
> > journaling filesystem?
> >
> > When I had ext2 it was OK. I read in noflushd manua
On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 08:46:24AM -0500, Derek Broughton wrote:
> On November 21, 2001 07:38 am, Nagy Gabor wrote:
> > Is there any way to have noflushd (ie. the hd stopping) when I have
> > a journaling filesystem?
> >
> > When I had ext2 it was OK. I read i
On Wed, 2001-11-21 at 13:38, Nagy Gabor wrote:
> Is there any way to have noflushd (ie. the hd stopping) when I have a
> journaling filesystem?
>
> When I had ext2 it was OK. I read in noflushd manual that with reiserfs
> it can't cooperate, now I have ext3, and the hd doesn
On Wed, 2001-11-21 at 13:38, Nagy Gabor wrote:
> Is there any way to have noflushd (ie. the hd stopping) when I have a
> journaling filesystem?
>
> When I had ext2 it was OK. I read in noflushd manual that with reiserfs
> it can't cooperate, now I have ext3, and the hd
On November 21, 2001 07:38 am, Nagy Gabor wrote:
> Is there any way to have noflushd (ie. the hd stopping) when I have
> a journaling filesystem?
>
> When I had ext2 it was OK. I read in noflushd manual that with
> reiserfs it can't cooperate, now I have ext3, and the hd do
on 21 November 2001 13:38 Nagy Gabor wrote:
>Is there any way to have noflushd (ie. the hd stopping) when I have a
>journaling filesystem?
I believe that xfs co-operates with noflushd.
Is there any way to have noflushd (ie. the hd stopping) when I have a
journaling filesystem?
When I had ext2 it was OK. I read in noflushd manual that with reiserfs
it can't cooperate, now I have ext3, and the hd doesn't stay off for
more than half of a minute.
Gee
On November 21, 2001 07:38 am, Nagy Gabor wrote:
> Is there any way to have noflushd (ie. the hd stopping) when I have
> a journaling filesystem?
>
> When I had ext2 it was OK. I read in noflushd manual that with
> reiserfs it can't cooperate, now I have ext3, and the hd do
on 21 November 2001 13:38 Nagy Gabor wrote:
>Is there any way to have noflushd (ie. the hd stopping) when I have a
>journaling filesystem?
I believe that xfs co-operates with noflushd.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
Is there any way to have noflushd (ie. the hd stopping) when I have a
journaling filesystem?
When I had ext2 it was OK. I read in noflushd manual that with reiserfs
it can't cooperate, now I have ext3, and the hd doesn't stay off for
more than half of a minute.
Gee
--
To UNSUBSCR
On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 07:16:27PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> I have just uploaded to incoming the noflushd daemon.
Which version?
--
Frank Petzold, IBM Zurich Research Laboratory, Säumerstrasse 4,
CH-8803 Rüschlikon/Switzerland, Tel. +41-1-724-84-42 Fax. +41-1-724-89-56
Business em
On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 07:16:27PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> I have just uploaded to incoming the noflushd daemon.
Which version?
--
Frank Petzold, IBM Zurich Research Laboratory, Säumerstrasse 4,
CH-8803 Rüschlikon/Switzerland, Tel. +41-1-724-84-42 Fax. +41-1-724-89-56
Business em
I have just uploaded to incoming the noflushd daemon.
Description: allow your laptop's hard disk to spin down
Noflushd is a daemon that spins down disks that have not been read from
after a certain amount of time, and then prevents disk writes from
spinning them back up. The effect is
I have just uploaded to incoming the noflushd daemon.
Description: allow your laptop's hard disk to spin down
Noflushd is a daemon that spins down disks that have not been read from
after a certain amount of time, and then prevents disk writes from
spinning them back up. The effect is
Does anyone have noflushd working properly? It always spins my disk
back up a few seconds after spinning it down.
noflushd writes to /var/log/daemon.log on spindown. Could that be
the problem? syslogd does buffer that log file (and most others).
Is there any way to find out which process is
noflushd (versio 1.8.1-1) spins down my hard drive even when it hasn't
been idle for long, and it always spins it back up exactly 20 seconds
later.
I'm having a tough enough time getting other programs to stop hitting
the drive and let it go to sleep. I don't need that kind o
I finally have my laptop repaired. Yay! So I'm finally sorting out
how to make it use less power.
* I tracked down mobile-update and installed it.
* I set my noatime on all my filesystems.
* I installed noflushd, but now I'm wondering why.
My BIOS settings let me set spindo
61 matches
Mail list logo