the Troubleshooter Menu's instructions of uninstalling, then re-installing the device, but I continue to have the same messages & problem.
What other options do I have? I'd really appreciate any help you can offer!
Thanks!
Yvonne Houchin
PS:
I have a Dell Inspiron 2500 running on
the Troubleshooter Menu's instructions of uninstalling, then re-installing the device, but I continue to have the same messages & problem.
What other options do I have? I'd really appreciate any help you can offer!
Thanks!
Yvonne Houchin
PS:
I have a Dell Inspiron 2500 running on
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-09-18 22:28 -0400:
> Before you do that, I'd recommend removing the keyboard, flushing it with
> warm fresh water, and letting it dry completely (perhaps even in an oven
> on a towel, with heat on "Warm").
>
> Then reinstall it; I'll bet it works.
>
>
Before you do that, I'd recommend removing the keyboard, flushing it with
warm fresh water, and letting it dry completely (perhaps even in an oven
on a towel, with heat on "Warm").
Then reinstall it; I'll bet it works.
You don't have anything to lose at this point, right?
--EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-09-18 22:28 -0400:
> Before you do that, I'd recommend removing the keyboard, flushing it with
> warm fresh water, a
Before you do that, I'd recommend removing the keyboard, flushing it with
warm fresh water, and letting it dry completely (perhaps even in an oven
on a towel, with heat on "Warm").
Then reinstall it; I'll bet it works.
You don't have anything to lose at this point, right?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
My girl-friend's Dell Inspiron 2500's keyboard is dead (some liquid
spilled into it). Could anyone recommend a cheap 3rd-party retailer?
-Andre
pgpa0Ychwp7Im.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--+nBD6E3TurpgldQp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
My girl-friend's Dell Inspiron 2500's keyboard is dead (some liquid
spilled into it). Could anyone recommend a cheap 3rd-party retailer?
-Andre
--+nBD6E3TurpgldQp
Content-Type: application/pgp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 04 September 2002 01:14 am, Gornatah wrote:
> my Inspiron-2500 {from DELL} is running on Windows-2000 Professional
> operating system. Now I want to chage it to Windows-98 operating system.Can
> I do this or it will effect
From: "Preben Randhol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Gornatah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/09/2002 (10:17) :
> > my Inspiron-2500 {from DELL} is running on Windows-2000 Professional
operating system.
> > Now I want to chage it to Windows-98 operating system.Can
Gornatah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/09/2002 (10:17) :
> my Inspiron-2500 {from DELL} is running on Windows-2000 Professional
> operating system.
> Now I want to chage it to Windows-98 operating system.Can I do this or it
> will effect my system.
> please reply soon sir
my Inspiron-2500 {from DELL} is running on
Windows-2000 Professional operating system.
Now I want to chage it to Windows-98 operating
system.Can I do this or it will effect my system.
please reply soon sir.
From: "Preben Randhol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Derek Broughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/08/2002 (14:27)
:
> > I've run all of those kernels (& 2.5.24) on my i2500, and never had a
> > problem - but I don't use an eepro100 so the problem seems definitely
> > specific to the driver.
>
> Your i2
Derek Broughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/08/2002 (14:27) :
> I've run all of those kernels (& 2.5.24) on my i2500, and never had a
> problem - but I don't use an eepro100 so the problem seems definitely
> specific to the driver.
Your i2500 doesn't have this network card?
--
Preben Randhol
* Preben Randhol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-08-21 08:40 -0400:
> Hi
>
> I was trying to upgrade to kernel 2.4.18 or 19 from 17. The problem is
> that for both the newer kernels my network card doesn't work. I used the
> same config file (that I loaded into xconfig) when I built the kernels.
>
> Ha
From: "Preben Randhol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I was trying to upgrade to kernel 2.4.18 or 19 from 17. The problem is
> that for both the newer kernels my network card doesn't work. I used the
> same config file (that I loaded into xconfig) when I built the kernels.
>
> Have anybody here with Insir
Hi
I was trying to upgrade to kernel 2.4.18 or 19 from 17. The problem is
that for both the newer kernels my network card doesn't work. I used the
same config file (that I loaded into xconfig) when I built the kernels.
Have anybody here with Insiron 2500 or that uses the eepro100 driver
experienc
Preben Randhol wrote:
Derek Broughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 14/05/2002
(20:42) :
It's Dell's fault that the DSDT (a major part of ACPI) is broken. I'm
not sure whether it's Dell's or Intel's fault processor limits aren't
supported. It's definitely Dell's fault that Thermal and Fan cont
Derek Broughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 14/05/2002
(20:42) :
>
> It's Dell's fault that the DSDT (a major part of ACPI) is broken. I'm
> not sure whether it's Dell's or Intel's fault processor limits aren't
> supported. It's definitely Dell's fault that Thermal and Fan controls
> aren't imp
Preben Randhol wrote:
> Derek Broughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 14/05/2002
> (20:42) :
>
>>It's Dell's fault that the DSDT (a major part of ACPI) is broken. I'm
>>not sure whether it's Dell's or Intel's fault processor limits aren't
>>supported. It's definitely Dell's fault that Thermal an
Derek Broughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 14/05/2002
(20:42) :
>
> It's Dell's fault that the DSDT (a major part of ACPI) is broken. I'm
> not sure whether it's Dell's or Intel's fault processor limits aren't
> supported. It's definitely Dell's fault that Thermal and Fan controls
> aren't im
> Derek Broughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 13/05/2002 (15:38)
:
> > From: "Preben Randhol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > Woody is stable. And when released in some weeks it will be the new
> > > stable distribution and then security fixes will only be towards
woody.
> >
> > I think it'll be mor
Derek Broughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 13/05/2002 (15:38) :
> From: "Preben Randhol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Woody is stable. And when released in some weeks it will be the new
> > stable distribution and then security fixes will only be towards woody.
>
> I think it'll be more than a few
> Derek Broughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 13/05/2002 (15:38)
:
> > From: "Preben Randhol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > Woody is stable. And when released in some weeks it will be the new
> > > stable distribution and then security fixes will only be towards
woody.
> >
> > I think it'll be mo
Derek Broughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 13/05/2002 (15:38) :
> From: "Preben Randhol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Woody is stable. And when released in some weeks it will be the new
> > stable distribution and then security fixes will only be towards woody.
>
> I think it'll be more than a fe
From: "Preben Randhol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Woody is stable. And when released in some weeks it will be the new
> stable distribution and then security fixes will only be towards woody.
I think it'll be more than a few weeks - it has to go to "frozen" first.
> I have Dell Inspirion 2500 running
Andre Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 13/05/2002 (13:57) :
> * Derek Broughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-05-13 07:22 -0400:
> > From: "Andre Berger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hi Derek!
>
> > > installing potato (don't want woody yet) on it. The stock kernel
> >
> > Why not? There's no good re
Andre Berger wrote:
>
>>>installing potato (don't want woody yet) on it. The stock kernel
>>
>>Why not? There's no good reason to avoid woody. Potato is way too old,
>>now.
>
> I'm a stability freak :)
You obviously belong on the Debian development team, since woody is
extremely stable. :-) Only
* Derek Broughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-05-13 07:22 -0400:
> From: "Andre Berger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Derek!
> > installing potato (don't want woody yet) on it. The stock kernel
>
> Why not? There's no good reason to avoid woody. Potato is way too old,
> now.
I'm a stability freak :)
From: "Andre Berger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> My friend has got this Dell Inspiron 2500, and I have some problems
> installing potato (don't want woody yet) on it. The stock kernel
Why not? There's no good reason to avoid woody. Potato is way too old,
now.
> 2.
From: "Preben Randhol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Woody is stable. And when released in some weeks it will be the new
> stable distribution and then security fixes will only be towards woody.
I think it'll be more than a few weeks - it has to go to "frozen" first.
> I have Dell Inspirion 2500 runnin
Andre Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 13/05/2002 (13:57) :
> * Derek Broughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-05-13 07:22 -0400:
> > From: "Andre Berger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hi Derek!
>
> > > installing potato (don't want woody yet) on it. The stock kernel
> >
> > Why not? There's no good r
Andre Berger wrote:
>
>>>installing potato (don't want woody yet) on it. The stock kernel
>>
>>Why not? There's no good reason to avoid woody. Potato is way too old,
>>now.
>
> I'm a stability freak :)
You obviously belong on the Debian development team, since woody is
extremely stable. :-) Onl
--sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
* Derek Broughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-05-13 07:22 -0400:
> From: "Andre Berger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Derek!
> > installing potato (don't want woody yet)
From: "Andre Berger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> My friend has got this Dell Inspiron 2500, and I have some problems
> installing potato (don't want woody yet) on it. The stock kernel
Why not? There's no good reason to avoid woody. Potato is way too old,
now.
>
Hi!
My friend has got this Dell Inspiron 2500, and I have some problems
installing potato (don't want woody yet) on it. The stock kernel
2.2.19 hangs at the initialization of the md (raid) driver, so I
installed 2.2.19-idepci. Which boots, but doesn't seem to have i810
or ipx/ncpfs supp
--NKoe5XOeduwbEQHU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi!
My friend has got this Dell Inspiron 2500, and I have some problems
installing potato (don't want woody yet) on it. The stock kernel
2.2.19 hangs a
Carlos García writes:
> I have a problem when I try to install a pcmcia network card in my
> laptop. The cardbus is o2micro OZ6933 and the pcmcia card is a
> RealTek 8139. The version of pcmcia that I have installed is 3.1.33
> and the kernel is 2.4.18.
[...]
> I think that the problem is in th
Carlos García writes:
> I have a problem when I try to install a pcmcia network card in my
> laptop. The cardbus is o2micro OZ6933 and the pcmcia card is a
> RealTek 8139. The version of pcmcia that I have installed is 3.1.33
> and the kernel is 2.4.18.
[...]
> I think that the problem is in t
Carlos wrote:
I have a problem when I try to install a pcmcia
network card in my laptop.
The cardbus is o2micro OZ6933 and the pcmcia card is a
RealTek 8139. The
version of pcmcia that I have installed is 3.1.33 and
the kernel is 2.4.18.
...
I think that the problem is in the cardbus o2micro.
Carlos wrote:
>I have a problem when I try to install a pcmcia
>network card in my laptop.
>The cardbus is o2micro OZ6933 and the pcmcia card is a
>RealTek 8139. The
>version of pcmcia that I have installed is 3.1.33 and
>the kernel is 2.4.18.
...
>I think that the problem is in the cardbus o2mic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I have a problem when I try to install a pcmcia
network card in my laptop.
The cardbus is o2micro OZ6933 and the pcmcia card is a
RealTek 8139. The
version of pcmcia that I have installed is 3.1.33 and
the kernel is 2.4.18.
When I plug the card:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I have a problem when I try to install a pcmcia
network card in my laptop.
The cardbus is o2micro OZ6933 and the pcmcia card is a
RealTek 8139. The
version of pcmcia that I have installed is 3.1.33 and
the kernel is 2.4.18.
When I plug the card
> > If you're interested in working with me on this, I'd suggest we keep trying
> > and report back to this list and acpi-devel with our results. We seem to be
> > at a pretty similar point.
> Yes, I thought the same. However, for the next weeks, I'm pretty (I start my
> last exams tomorrow).
+ bu
ackage acpid.
> > It watchs /proc/acpi/event to discover what happends with ACPI,
> > including the suspend and power buttons. So XDM is enough to power off
>
> Where is the 'suspend' on a inspiron 2500? The blue suspend key (Fn-Esc)
> doesn't appear to send any signal
> > If you're interested in working with me on this, I'd suggest we keep trying
> > and report back to this list and acpi-devel with our results. We seem to be
> > at a pretty similar point.
> Yes, I thought the same. However, for the next weeks, I'm pretty (I start my
> last exams tomorrow).
+ b
ackage acpid.
> > It watchs /proc/acpi/event to discover what happends with ACPI,
> > including the suspend and power buttons. So XDM is enough to power off
>
> Where is the 'suspend' on a inspiron 2500? The blue suspend key (Fn-Esc)
> doesn't appear to send any sig
From: "Baptiste Malguy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> 1) My Inspiron 2500:
>
>
> I have to say that even if now it works pretty well with most of the
> functionnalities ready, it has not always been true.
> Many trouble with ALSA, X, APM, ACPI,
From: "Baptiste Malguy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> 1) My Inspiron 2500:
>
>
> I have to say that even if now it works pretty well with most of the
> functionnalities ready, it has not always been true.
> Many trouble with ALSA, X, APM, ACPI,
Hello,
I've just subscribed to this mailing-list after havin read the thread
about the Dell Inspiron 2500 about a month ago.
This mail has to goals:
- provide my own experience with my Inspiron 2500
- ask some questions :)
Here we go:
1) My Inspiron 2500:
I have t
Hello,
I've just subscribed to this mailing-list after havin read the thread
about the Dell Inspiron 2500 about a month ago.
This mail has to goals:
- provide my own experience with my Inspiron 2500
- ask some questions :)
Here we go:
1) My Inspiron 2500:
I have t
I think 2.4.X PCI support is just jacked. I went and got 2.2.20,
setup the kernel the way I want it, installed the pcmcia-cs package,
fixed the module naming problem (wavelan_cs vs orinoco_cs) rebooted
and boop beep my card is regonized. I haven't gotten a chance to
configure it yet since I'm at
I think 2.4.X PCI support is just jacked. I went and got 2.2.20,
setup the kernel the way I want it, installed the pcmcia-cs package,
fixed the module naming problem (wavelan_cs vs orinoco_cs) rebooted
and boop beep my card is regonized. I haven't gotten a chance to
configure it yet since I'm at
sageFool wrote:
Hi, so I compiled the kernel with the PCMCIA/CARDBUS support turned on.
WHen I run ./test_setup I get:
debian:/usr/src/pcmcia-cs-3.1.31/debug-tools# ./test_setup
Current kernel: 2.4.17 #6 Tue Feb 19 07:50:28 PST 2002
/lib/modules/2.4.17/pcmcia/pcmcia_core.o not found.
The P
sageFool wrote:
> Hi, so I compiled the kernel with the PCMCIA/CARDBUS support turned on.
>
> WHen I run ./test_setup I get:
>
> debian:/usr/src/pcmcia-cs-3.1.31/debug-tools# ./test_setup
> Current kernel: 2.4.17 #6 Tue Feb 19 07:50:28 PST 2002
> /lib/modules/2.4.17/pcmcia/pcmcia_core.o not fo
Hi, so I compiled the kernel with the PCMCIA/CARDBUS support turned on.
WHen I run ./test_setup I get:
debian:/usr/src/pcmcia-cs-3.1.31/debug-tools# ./test_setup
Current kernel: 2.4.17 #6 Tue Feb 19 07:50:28 PST 2002
/lib/modules/2.4.17/pcmcia/pcmcia_core.o not found.
The PCMCIA modules are no
Hi, so I compiled the kernel with the PCMCIA/CARDBUS support turned on.
WHen I run ./test_setup I get:
debian:/usr/src/pcmcia-cs-3.1.31/debug-tools# ./test_setup
Current kernel: 2.4.17 #6 Tue Feb 19 07:50:28 PST 2002
/lib/modules/2.4.17/pcmcia/pcmcia_core.o not found.
The PCMCIA modules are n
If it is, mark it as cardbus or
anything apropriate...that one could also make some trouble.
-Sol-
On Wednesday 20 February 2002 15:03, Derek Broughton wrote:
> sageFool wrote:
> > I have a Inspiron 2500, with debian/unstable installed on it. I'm
> > running the 2.4.17 ke
sageFool wrote:
I have a Inspiron 2500, with debian/unstable installed on it. I'm
running the 2.4.17 kernel (downloaded the source package and
recompiled a million times)
Me too, but I've only compiled about a thousand times :-)
I have PCMCIA support turned off in the ker
If it is, mark it as cardbus or
anything apropriate...that one could also make some trouble.
-Sol-
On Wednesday 20 February 2002 15:03, Derek Broughton wrote:
> sageFool wrote:
> > I have a Inspiron 2500, with debian/unstable installed on it. I'm
> > running the 2.4.17 ke
sageFool wrote:
>
> I have a Inspiron 2500, with debian/unstable installed on it. I'm
> running the 2.4.17 kernel (downloaded the source package and
> recompiled a million times)
Me too, but I've only compiled about a thousand times :-)
> I have PCMCIA support tur
Hi, so I've been banging my head against this for about a week now
(and am currently running on very little sleep) and would love some
help!!
I have a Inspiron 2500, with debian/unstable installed on it. I'm
running the 2.4.17 kernel (downloaded the source package and
recompiled a mil
Hi, so I've been banging my head against this for about a week now
(and am currently running on very little sleep) and would love some
help!!
I have a Inspiron 2500, with debian/unstable installed on it. I'm
running the 2.4.17 kernel (downloaded the source package and
recompiled a mil
Hi, so I've been banging my head against this for about a week now
(and am currently running on very little sleep) and would love some
help!!
I have a Inspiron 2500, with debian/unstable installed on it. I'm
running the 2.4.17 kernel (downloaded the source package and
recompiled a mil
Hi, so I've been banging my head against this for about a week now
(and am currently running on very little sleep) and would love some
help!!
I have a Inspiron 2500, with debian/unstable installed on it. I'm
running the 2.4.17 kernel (downloaded the source package and
recompiled a mil
Derek Broughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/02/2002 (18:42) :
> From: "Preben Randhol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I have turned the keyrate to max and the keydelay to minimum on my
> > laptop, but still it is slow compared to my office machine (a desktop).
> >
> > Is it the hardware that is the li
Derek Broughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/02/2002 (18:42) :
> From: "Preben Randhol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I have turned the keyrate to max and the keydelay to minimum on my
> > laptop, but still it is slow compared to my office machine (a desktop).
> >
> > Is it the hardware that is the l
From: "Preben Randhol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I have turned the keyrate to max and the keydelay to minimum on my
> laptop, but still it is slow compared to my office machine (a desktop).
>
> Is it the hardware that is the limitation?
It can't be, as I can get things going pretty fast in windows. W
From: "Preben Randhol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I have turned the keyrate to max and the keydelay to minimum on my
> laptop, but still it is slow compared to my office machine (a desktop).
>
> Is it the hardware that is the limitation?
It can't be, as I can get things going pretty fast in windows.
Cameron Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/02/2002 (02:42) :
> You can use xset to set the speed of the keyboard, and that of the mouse
> (and some other things too).
Yes, but can one get it to be even faster? I used xset and set it to the
max values, but it is still slow.
--
Preben Randhol
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Preben Randhol wrote:
>I have turned the keyrate to max and the keydelay to minimum on my
>laptop, but still it is slow compared to my office machine (a desktop).
>
>Is it the hardware that is the limitation?
You can use xset to set the speed of the keyboard, and that of the m
Cameron Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/02/2002 (02:42) :
> You can use xset to set the speed of the keyboard, and that of the mouse
> (and some other things too).
Yes, but can one get it to be even faster? I used xset and set it to the
max values, but it is still slow.
--
Preben Randhol
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Preben Randhol wrote:
>I have turned the keyrate to max and the keydelay to minimum on my
>laptop, but still it is slow compared to my office machine (a desktop).
>
>Is it the hardware that is the limitation?
You can use xset to set the speed of the keyboard, and that of the
I have turned the keyrate to max and the keydelay to minimum on my
laptop, but still it is slow compared to my office machine (a desktop).
Is it the hardware that is the limitation?
Preben
--
Preben Randhol «For me, Ada95 puts back the joy in programming.»
I have turned the keyrate to max and the keydelay to minimum on my
laptop, but still it is slow compared to my office machine (a desktop).
Is it the hardware that is the limitation?
Preben
--
Preben Randhol «For me, Ada95 puts back the joy in programming.»
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
From: "Preben Randhol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Barb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/02/2002 (14:23) :
> > I have a 2500 and I have been running Mandrake because Debian (and
several
> > other distros I've tried) lock up on boot up at md (whatever that is).
I'd
> > love to know what that is and how to
From: "cyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Actually, just tonight I learned that win2k (and probably ME + XP) do
> their suspend to disk into a file - hiberfile.sys I believe. So it seems
> to me that whatever the case is with suspending to disk, ACPI seems to
> 'allow' more control for where the OS write
From: "Preben Randhol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Barb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/02/2002 (14:23) :
> > I have a 2500 and I have been running Mandrake because Debian (and
several
> > other distros I've tried) lock up on boot up at md (whatever that is).
I'd
> > love to know what that is and how t
From: "cyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Actually, just tonight I learned that win2k (and probably ME + XP) do
> their suspend to disk into a file - hiberfile.sys I believe. So it seems
> to me that whatever the case is with suspending to disk, ACPI seems to
> 'allow' more control for where the OS writ
On Sun, 2002-02-03 at 14:26, Preben Randhol wrote:
> Rob Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03/02/2002 (15:11) :
> >
> > Is the 2500 like the 4000? I've got a 4000 and wrote an article about
> > it for debianplanet. You can read it at
> > http://www.debianplanet.org/article.php?sid=258
>
> No
On Wed, 2002-01-30 at 20:52, Preben Randhol wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have read about the problems of installing Debian on Inspiron 2500 and
> solved that. Now before installing I wonder about some things I
> haven't found answers to on the net:
>
> 1. I see that the hard
On Sun, 2002-02-03 at 14:26, Preben Randhol wrote:
> Rob Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03/02/2002 (15:11) :
> >
> > Is the 2500 like the 4000? I've got a 4000 and wrote an article about
> > it for debianplanet. You can read it at
> > http://www.debianplanet.org/article.php?sid=258
>
> N
Barb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/02/2002 (14:23) :
> I have a 2500 and I have been running Mandrake because Debian (and several
> other distros I've tried) lock up on boot up at md (whatever that is). I'd
> love to know what that is and how to make it go away.
>
> About the only advice I can
On Wed, 2002-01-30 at 20:52, Preben Randhol wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have read about the problems of installing Debian on Inspiron 2500 and
> solved that. Now before installing I wonder about some things I
> haven't found answers to on the net:
>
> 1. I see that the hard
Barb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/02/2002 (14:23) :
> I have a 2500 and I have been running Mandrake because Debian (and several
> other distros I've tried) lock up on boot up at md (whatever that is). I'd
> love to know what that is and how to make it go away.
>
> About the only advice I ca
quot;Preben Randhol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Joseph Fannin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2002 1:19 PM
Subject: Re: Need advice installing Debian on Inspiron 2500
I have a 2500 and I have been running Mandrake because Debian (and several
other dis
quot;Preben Randhol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Joseph Fannin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2002 1:19 PM
Subject: Re: Need advice installing Debian on Inspiron 2500
I have a 2500 and I have been running Mandrake because Debia
Joseph Fannin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/02/2002 (12:22) :
> Powering the machine off is all that ACPI seems to be good for ATM
> as well, but I have some hope that the battery monitoring functions
> could be fixed soon (at least, it seems close enough to working and I
> have enough inform
Joseph Fannin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/02/2002 (12:22) :
> Powering the machine off is all that ACPI seems to be good for ATM
> as well, but I have some hope that the battery monitoring functions
> could be fixed soon (at least, it seems close enough to working and I
> have enough infor
Barb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/02/2002 (14:23) :
> I have a 2500 and I have been running Mandrake because Debian (and several
> other distros I've tried) lock up on boot up at md (whatever that is). I'd
> love to know what that is and how to make it go away.
It was a bit tricky, but it can
I have a 2500 and I have been running Mandrake because Debian (and several
other distros I've tried) lock up on boot up at md (whatever that is). I'd
love to know what that is and how to make it go away.
About the only advice I can give is for me, with the i815, the best I can
do in X is 15 bi
Joseph Fannin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/02/2002 (12:22) :
>
> > btw, I did find one thing that you can do with APM. If the apm.o module is
> > loaded, shutdown actually halts the system. If it isn't, shutdown leaves
> > you at a "Power Off" prompt :-)
>
> (Whoops, I forgot to CC my l
Barb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/02/2002 (14:23) :
> I have a 2500 and I have been running Mandrake because Debian (and several
> other distros I've tried) lock up on boot up at md (whatever that is). I'd
> love to know what that is and how to make it go away.
It was a bit tricky, but it ca
I have a 2500 and I have been running Mandrake because Debian (and several
other distros I've tried) lock up on boot up at md (whatever that is). I'd
love to know what that is and how to make it go away.
About the only advice I can give is for me, with the i815, the best I can
do in X is 15 bi
Joseph Fannin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/02/2002 (12:22) :
>
> > btw, I did find one thing that you can do with APM. If the apm.o module is
> > loaded, shutdown actually halts the system. If it isn't, shutdown leaves
> > you at a "Power Off" prompt :-)
>
> (Whoops, I forgot to CC my
> btw, I did find one thing that you can do with APM. If the apm.o module is
> loaded, shutdown actually halts the system. If it isn't, shutdown leaves
> you at a "Power Off" prompt :-)
(Whoops, I forgot to CC my last reply to the list.)
Powering the machine off is all that ACPI seems
Actually, just tonight I learned that win2k (and probably ME + XP) do
their suspend to disk into a file - hiberfile.sys I believe. So it seems
to me that whatever the case is with suspending to disk, ACPI seems to
'allow' more control for where the OS writes it (perhaps to avoid the
whole bios lim
> btw, I did find one thing that you can do with APM. If the apm.o module is
> loaded, shutdown actually halts the system. If it isn't, shutdown leaves
> you at a "Power Off" prompt :-)
(Whoops, I forgot to CC my last reply to the list.)
Powering the machine off is all that ACPI seem
Actually, just tonight I learned that win2k (and probably ME + XP) do
their suspend to disk into a file - hiberfile.sys I believe. So it seems
to me that whatever the case is with suspending to disk, ACPI seems to
'allow' more control for where the OS writes it (perhaps to avoid the
whole bios li
From: "Preben Randhol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Joseph Fannin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/02/2002 (07:23) :
> >When I say the BIOS is broken, I mean anything involving APM --
> > even reading battery status -- causes a kernel OOPS, which when
> > traced, fails when calling the system BIOS. A
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
